Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Cardiovascular Risk: Gender Differences in Lifestyle Behaviors and Coping Strategies

  • Published:
International Journal of Behavioral Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Although cardiovascular disease (CVD) does not occur until mid to late life for most adults, the presence of risk factors, such as high blood pressure (BP) and cholesterol, has increased dramatically in young adults.

Purpose

The present study examined the relationships between gender and coping strategies, lifestyle behaviors, and cardiovascular risks.

Method

The sample consisted of 297 (71% female) university students. Participants completed a survey to assess demographics, lifestyle behaviors, and coping strategies, and a physiological assessment including lipid and blood pressure (BP) measurements. Data collection occurred from January 2007 to May 2008.

Results

Analyses revealed that age, ethnicity, greater body mass index (BMI), greater use of social support, and less frequent exercise were associated with higher cholesterol, while gender, age, greater BMI, and less frequent exercise were associated with higher systolic BP. There were two significant interactions: one between gender and avoidant coping and the other between gender and exercise on systolic BP, such that for men greater use of avoidant coping or exercise was associated with lower systolic BP.

Conclusion

Understanding how young adults manage their demands and cope with stress sets the stage for understanding the developmental process of CVD. Both coping strategies and lifestyle behaviors must be considered in appraising gender-related cardiovascular risk at an early age before the disease process has begun.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lloyd-Jones D, Adams R, Carnethon M, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics 2009 update: a report from the American Heart Association statistics committee and stroke statistics subcommittee. Circulation. 2009;119:e21–e181.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Heron M, Hoyert D, Murphy S, Xu J, Kochanek K, Tejada-Vera B. Deaths: final data for 2006. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2009;57:14.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pleis J, Lethbridge-Çejku M. Summary health statistics for U.S. adults: National Health Interview Survey, 2006. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat. 2007;10:235.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sarafino E. Health psychology: biopsychosocial interactions. 6th ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Hoboken, NJ; 2008.

  5. Mensah, G, Brown, D, Croft, J, Greenlund, K. Major coronary risk factors and death from coronary heart disease: baseline and follow-up mortality data from the Second National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP). Third report of the expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (ATP III final report). National Heart Lung and Blood Institute. Web site. 2011. http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/cholesterol/atp3full.pdf. Accessed May 20, 2011.

  6. Eaton D, Kann L, Kinchen S, et al. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Youth risk behavior surveillance: United States. MMWR. 2008;57:1–131.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Buckingham J. Glucocorticoids: exemplars of multi-tasking. Br J Pharmacol. 2006;147:S258–68.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dedovic K, Duchesne A, Andrews J, Engert V, Pruessner J. The brain and the stress axis: the neural correlates of cortisol regulation in response to stress. Neuroimage. 2009;47:864–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kajantie E, Phillips D. The effects of sex and hormonal status on the physiological response to acute psychosocial stress. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2006;31:151–78.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang J, Korczykowski M, Rao H, Fan Y, Pluta J, Gur R, McEwen B, Detre J. Gender difference in neural response to psychological stress. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2007;2:227–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yeh S, Huang C, Chou H, Wan T. Gender differences in stress and coping among elderly patients on hemodialysis. Sex Rol. 2009;60:44–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Uchino B. Social support and health: a review of physiological processes potentially underlying links to disease outcomes. Int J Behav Med. 2006;29:377–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sollár T, Sollárová E. Proactive coping from the perspective of age, gender and education. Stud Psychol. 2009;51:161–5.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Robb C, Small B, Haley W. Gender differences in coping with functional disability in older married couples: the role of personality and social resources. Aging Ment Health. 2008;12:423–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Doster J, Purdum M, Martin L, Goven A, Moorefield R. Gender differences, anger expression, and cardiovascular risk. J Ment Nerv Disord. 2009;197(7):552–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kuczmarski MF, Kuczmarski RJ, Najjar M. Effects of age on validity of self-reported height, weight, and body mass index: findings from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1994. J Am Diet Assoc. 2001;101:28–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Carver CS. You want to measure coping but your protocol's too long: consider the Brief COPE. Int J Behav Med. 1997;4(1):92–101.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Carver CS, Scheier MF, Weintraub JK. Assessing coping strategies: a theoretically based approach. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1989;56:267–83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Delongis A, Folkman S, Lazarus R. The impact of daily stress on health and mood: psychological and social resources as mediators. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988;54:486–95.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Aiken L, West S. Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park: SAGE Publications, Inc. Thousand Oaks, CA; 1991.

  22. Frazier PA, Tix AP, Baron KE. Testing moderator and mediator effects in counseling psychology research. J Couns Psychol. 2004;51:115–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Landow MV. College students: mental health and coping strategies. Hauppauge: Nova Science; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Navalta JW, Sedlock DA, Park KS, McFarlin BK. Neither gender nor menstrual cycle phase influences exercise-induced lymphocyte apoptosis in untrained subjects. Appl Physiol, Nutr, Metab. 2007;32:481–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2009. Web Site: http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/. Accessed January 5, 2009.

  26. Uchino B. Understanding the links between social support and physical health: a lifespan perspective with emphasis on the separability of perceived and received support. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2009;4:236–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Holt-Lunstad J, Uchino B, Smith T, Hicks A. On the importance of relationship quality: the impact of ambivalence in friendships on cardiovascular functioning. Ann Behav Med. 2007;33:278–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Office of Applied Studies. August 2, 2007. The NSDUH report: gender differences in alcohol use and alcohol dependence or abuse: 2004 and 2005. Rockville, MD.

  29. Klatsky, AL. Alcohol and cardiovascular health. Physiol Behav, December 31, 2009.

  30. Juonala M, Viikari J, Kahonen M, et al. Alcohol consumption is directly associated with carotid intima-media thickness in Finnish young adults: the cardiovascular risk in young Finns study. Atherosclerosis. 2009;204:93–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ford C, Nonnemaker J, Wirth K. The influence of adolescent body mass index, physical activity, and tobacco use on blood pressure and cholesterol in young adulthood. J Adolesc Health. 2008;43:576–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Steinhardt M, Dolbier C. Evaluation of a resilience intervention to enhance coping strategies and protective factors and decrease symptomatology. J Am Coll Health. 2008;56:445–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luci A. Martin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Martin, L.A., Critelli, J.W., Doster, J.A. et al. Cardiovascular Risk: Gender Differences in Lifestyle Behaviors and Coping Strategies. Int.J. Behav. Med. 20, 97–105 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-011-9204-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-011-9204-3

Keywords

Navigation