The IPO window of opportunity for digital product and service firms
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Recognizing the window of opportunity to go public for digital product and service (DPS) firms is especially critical because they have high fixed-to-variable cost (FCVC) ratios and winner-take-all industry competition. Too early and their very risky nature means a steep discount to their stock. Too late and they may not be able to sell stock or it may be too late to take advantage of a new product or service. We find that the size of the run-up in stock price at the IPO is higher (lower) for DPS firms the earlier (later) they go public and significantly more than for traditional firms. We also find that the DPS firms that go public earlier or later outside the window of opportunity are more likely to fail. This result is also stronger for DPS firms than for traditional firms.
- Adams, R. (2011). Myspace cuts 47% of workforce. The Wall Street Journal. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703791904576075892399066126.html. Accessed 21 July 2011.
- Bakos, J. Y. (1991). A strategic analysis of electronic marketplaces. MIS Quarterly, 15(3), 294–310. CrossRef
- Beal, D. (2005). SAS code to select the best multiple linear regression model for multivariable data using information criteria. Science Applications International Corporation, SA01_05.
- Beatty, R. P., & Ritter, J. (1986). Investment banking, reputation and underpricing of initial public offerings. Journal of Financial Economics, 15(1–2), 213–232. CrossRef
- Busaba, W., Benveniste, L., & Guo, R. (2001). The option to withdraw IPOs during the premarket: Empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 61, 477–478. CrossRef
- Campbell, J., Lettaqu, M., Malkiel, B., & Xu, Y. (2001). Have individual stocks become more volatile? An empirical exploration of idiosyncratic risk. Journal of Finance, 56, 1–43. CrossRef
- Carter, R., & Manaster, S. (1990). Initial public offerings and underwriter reputation. Journal of Finance, 45, 1045–1068. CrossRef
- Carter, R., Dark, F., & Singh, A. (1998). Underwriter reputation, initial returns and the long-run performance of IPO stocks. Journal of Finance, 53, 285–311. CrossRef
- Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1997). Industry costs of equity. Journal of Financial Economics, 43, 153–193. CrossRef
- Gallaugher, J. M., & Wang, Y.-M. (2002). Understanding network effects in software markets: evidence from Web server pricing. MIS Quarterly, 26(4), 303–327. CrossRef
- Habib, M., & Ljungqvist, A. (2001). Under-pricing and entrepreneurial wealth losses in IPOs: theory and evidence. Review of Financial Studies, 14, 433–458. CrossRef
- Hanley, K., Kumar, W., & Seguin, P. (1993). Price stabilization in the market for new issues. Journal of Financial Economics, 34, 177–197. CrossRef
- Heckman, J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47, 153–162. CrossRef
- Johnson, J., & Miller, R. (1988). Investment banker prestige and the under-pricing of initial public offerings. Financial Management, 17, 19–22. CrossRef
- Jovanovic, B., & Rousseau, P. (2001). Why wait? A century of life before IPO. American Economic Review, 91, 336–341. CrossRef
- Katz, M., & Shapiro, C. (1985). Network externalities, competition and compatibility. American Economic Review, 75(3), 424–440.
- Lehmann-Grube, U. (1997). Strategic choice of quality when quality is costly. The Rand Journal of Economics, 28, 372–384. CrossRef
- Leland, H., & Pyle, H. (1977). Informational asymmetries, financial structure, and financial intermediation. Journal of Finance, 32, 371–387. CrossRef
- Lev, B. (1974). On the association between operating leverage and risk. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 9, 627–641. CrossRef
- Ljungqvist, A., & Wilhelm, J. (2003). IPO pricing in the dot-com bubble. Journal of Finance, 58, 723–752. CrossRef
- Lowry, M., & Schwert, R. (2002). IPO market cycles: bubbles or sequential learning? Journal of Finance, 57, 1171–1200. CrossRef
- Noe, T., & Parker, G. (2005). Winner take all: competition, strategy, and the structure of returns in the Internet economy. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 14, 141–164. CrossRef
- Rayport, J. F., & Sviokla, J. J. (1995). Exploiting the virtual value chain. Harvard Business Review, 75–85.
- Ritter, J. (1984). The hot issue market of 1980. Journal of Business, 57, 215–240. CrossRef
- Ritter, J., & Welch, I. (2002). A review of IPO activity, pricing, and allocations. Journal of Finance, 57, 1795–1827. CrossRef
- Rock, K. (1986). Why new issues are underpriced. Journal of Financial Economics, 15, 87–212. CrossRef
- Ronnen, U. (1991). “Minimum quality standards, fixed costs and competition. The Rand Journal of Economics, 22, 490–504. CrossRef
- Schilling, M. (1998). Technological lockout: an integrative model of the economic and strategic factors driving technology success and failure. Academy of Management Review, 98, 267–284.
- Schilling, M. (2002). Technology success and failure in winner-take-all markets: the impact of learning orientation, timing and network externalities. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 387–398. CrossRef
- Schultz, P. (2003). Pseudo market timing and the long-run underperformance of IPOs. Journal of Finance, 58, 483–518. CrossRef
- Strader, T. J., Ramaswami, S. N., & Houle, P. A. (2007). Perceived network externalities and communication technology acceptance. European Journal of Information Systems, 16, 54–65. CrossRef
- Viswanathan, S. (2005). Competing across technology-differentiated channels: the impact of network externalities and switching costs. Management Science, 51, 483–496. CrossRef
- White, H. (1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, 48, 817–838. CrossRef
- Wilbon, A. (2002). Predicting survival of high-technology initial public offering firms. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 13, 127–141. CrossRef
- Yamamoto, H., Okada, I., Kobayashi, N., & Ohta, T. (2002). The information channel effect in the winner-take-all: a multi-agent simulation. In Proceedings of the 6th World Multi-Conference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics (SCI 2002), 2, 510–513.
- The IPO window of opportunity for digital product and service firms
Volume 22, Issue 4 , pp 255-266
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Digital product
- Digital service
- Digital technology
- Financing strategy
- Initial public offering
- IPO timing
- G24 – Investment Banking