Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences

, Volume 8, Issue 3, pp 601–624

Did Homo erectus kill a Pelorovis herd at BK (Olduvai Gorge)? A taphonomic study of BK5

  • Elia Organista
  • Manuel Domínguez-Rodrigo
  • Charles P. Egeland
  • David Uribelarrea
  • Audax Mabulla
  • Enrique Baquedano
Original Paper

DOI: 10.1007/s12520-015-0241-8

Cite this article as:
Organista, E., Domínguez-Rodrigo, M., Egeland, C.P. et al. Archaeol Anthropol Sci (2016) 8: 601. doi:10.1007/s12520-015-0241-8

Abstract

New research and excavations at Bell Korongo (BK, Olduvai Gorge, Upper Bed II) have uncovered a dense concentration of megafauna that contributes to our understanding of Homo erectus subsistence strategies around 1.34 Ma. Recent work has yielded clear taphonomic evidence for the exploitation of large-sized animals. The frequency and distribution of cut marks, for example, indicates that hominins enjoyed early access to substantial amounts of meat. This degree of carcass processing, particularly megafauna, suggests that the human group(s) exploiting them were large and had significant nutritional needs. Here, we build upon this work by presenting the first comprehensive taphonomic analysis of the faunal material excavated by the Leakeys at BK between 1952 and 1957 corresponding to 24 Pelorovis oldowayensis. Leakey’s assemblage was biased due to selective collection of the most readily identifiable specimens, among which long bone shafts were not included. The recent assemblage reflects the relevance of using long bone shafts to overcome the equifinality of the alternative scenarios proposed to explain the accumulation of Pelorovis. The analysis of The Olduvai Paleoanthropology and Paleoecology Project’s (TOPPP) recent assemblage sheds light on the reconstruction of hominin strategies of carcass acquisition at BK.

Keywords

Olduvai George Lower Pleistocene archeology Megafaunal Taphonomy Percussion marks Cut marks Hunted 

Supplementary material

12520_2015_241_Fig15_ESM.gif (152 kb)
Fig. A1

Anatomical distribution of percussion and tooth marks on limb bones from small carcasses at BK5. Bones are redrawn from Pales and Lambert (1971) (GIF 151 kb)

12520_2015_241_MOESM1_ESM.tif (12.5 mb)
High Resolution Image (TIFF 12800 kb)
12520_2015_241_Fig16_ESM.gif (247 kb)
Fig. A2

Anatomical distribution of percussion, cut and tooth marks on limb bones from medium carcasses at BK5. Bones are redrawn from Pales and Lambert (1971) (GIF 247 kb)

12520_2015_241_MOESM2_ESM.tif (14.1 mb)
High Resolution Image (TIFF 14473 kb)
12520_2015_241_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (7.1 mb)
ESM 1Details of the bone accumulation where an elephant tibia can be seen (PDF 7262 kb)
12520_2015_241_MOESM4_ESM.pdf (14.8 mb)
ESM 2Surface of BK5 showing fossils and stone tools (PDF 15125 kb)

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elia Organista
    • 1
  • Manuel Domínguez-Rodrigo
    • 1
    • 2
  • Charles P. Egeland
    • 3
  • David Uribelarrea
    • 4
  • Audax Mabulla
    • 5
  • Enrique Baquedano
    • 6
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PrehistoryComplutense UniversityMadridSpain
  2. 2.IDEA (Instituto de Evolución en África)Museo de los OrígenesMadridSpain
  3. 3.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of North Carolina at GreensboroGreensboroUSA
  4. 4.Department of GeodynamicsComplutense UniversityMadridSpain
  5. 5.Archaeology UnitUniversity of Dar es SalaamDar es SalaamTanzania
  6. 6.Museo Arqueológico RegionalAlcalá de HenaresSpain

Personalised recommendations