Abstract
Airborne light detection and ranging (LiDAR) is a technology that offers the ability to create highly detailed digital terrain models (DTMs) that expose low relief topographic features. The availability of these models holds potential to augment archaeological field research by producing visual imagery that can used to identify traces of ancient anthropogenic activity. This capability is particularly useful in hard to access areas and in areas of dense vegetation, where manual surveys are difficult to plan and to execute. Additionally, LiDAR technology is nonintrusive so that initial surveys can be performed without altering or destroying the integrity of the landscape and any features that it may contain. This paper explores the use of LiDAR within the field of archaeology and uses a case study approach to investigate the potential of LiDAR data for identifying earthworks dating back to the pre-Roman period in central England. Additionally, an evaluation of a technique to enhance the imagery in order to facilitate detecting human activity on the landscape is undertaken. Vegetation cover, particularly during leaf-on periods, can interfere with the ability of LiDAR to penetrate to the surface and can therefore impact its accuracy. The effect of vegetation cover on the ability of LiDAR to produce accurate DTMs is evaluated in relationship to its impact on the identification of archaeological features.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (2000) 36 CFR PART 800 — protection of historic properties. GPO, Washington
Barber M (2011) A history of aerial photography and archaeology. English Heritage, Swindon
Bennett R, Welham K, Hill RA Ford A (2011) Making the most of airborne remote sensing techniques for archaeological survey and interpretation. In: Cowley DC (ed) Remote sensing for archaeological heritage management. EAC Occasional Paper No. 5, 99–106
Bennett R, Welham K, Hill RA, Ford A (2012) A comparison of visualization techniques for models created from airborne laser scanned data. Archaeol Prospect 19:41–48. doi:10.1002/arp.1414
Challis K, Howard AJ (2013) The role of lidar intensity data in interpreting environmental and cultural archaeological landscapes. In: Opitz RS, Cowley DC (eds) Interpreting archaeological topography: 3D data, visualisation and observation. Oxford Books, Oxford, pp 161–170
Chase AF, Chase DZ, Fisher CT, Leisz SJ, Weshampel JF (2012) Geospatial revolution and remote sensing LiDAR in Mesoamerican archaeology. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109(32):12916–12921
Council of Europe (1992, January 16) European Convention on the Protection of the Archaeological Heritage. Council of Europe’s Treaty Office: http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/EN/Treaties/Html/143.htm. Accessed 7 January 2014
Cowley DC (2012, October) In with the new, out with the old? Auto-extraction for remote sensing archaeology. SPIE Remote Sens 853206–853206
Crow P (2004) Trees and forestry on archaeological sites in the UK: a review document. UK Forestry Commission
Crutchley S, Crow P (2010) The light fantastic: Using airborne lidar in archaeological survey. English Heritage, Swindon
Cunliffe BW (1978) Iron Age communities in Britain, 2nd edn. Routledge, London
Devereux BJ, Amable GS, Crow P (2008) Visualisation of LiDAR terrain models for archaeological feature detection. Antiquity 82(316):470–479
Doneus M, Briese C, Fera M, Janner M (2008) Archaeological prospection of forested areas using full-waveform airborne laser scanning. J Archaeol Sci 35:882–893
Field D (2009) Celtic fields. In: Pollard J, Pollard J (eds) Prehistoric Britain. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, pp 207–215
Gallagher JM, Josephs RL (2008) Using LiDAR to detect cultural resources in a forested environment: an example from Isle Royale Nationl Park, Michigan, USA. Archaeol Prospect 15(3):187–206
Harding DW (2004) The Iron Age in Northern Britain: Celts and Romans, natives and invaders. Routledge, Milton Park
Harmon JM, Leone MP, Prince SD, Snyder M (2006) LiDAR for archaeological landscape analysis: a case study of two eighteenth-century Maryland plantation sites. Am Antiq 71(4):649–670
Heckenberger MJ, Kuikuro A, Kuikuro UT, Russell JC, Schmidt M, Fausto C, Franchetto B (2003) Amazonia 1492: Pristine forest or cultural parkland. Science 301:1710–1713
Her Majesty’s Government (2013) The government’s statement on the historic environment for England. Department for Culture, Media & Sports
Hesse R (2010) LiDAR-derived local relief models — a new tools for archaeological prospection. Archaeol Prospect 17:67–72. doi:10.1002/arp.374
Humme A, Lindenbergh R, Sueur C (2006) Revealing celtic fields from LiDAR data using kriging based filtering. Proc ISPRS Comm V Symp 35:25–27
Johnson R (2009) Later prehistoric landscapes and inhabitation. In: Pollard J, Pollard J (eds) Prehistoric Britain. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, pp 274–276
Kvamme K (2003) Geophysical surveys as landscape archaeology. Am Antiq 68(3):435–457
Kvamme KL, Ahler SA (2007) Integrated remote sensing and excavation at Double Ditch State Historic Site, North Dakota. Am Antiq 72(3):539–561
Lasaponara R, Coluzzi R, Masini N (2011) Flights into the past: full-waveform airborne laser scanning data for archaeological investigation. J Archaeol Sci 38:2061–2070
Lipe WD (2000, Spring) Conserving the in situ archaeological record. Conserv Perspect GCI Newsl 15
Mallet C, Bretar F (2009) Full-waveform topographic lidar: state-of-the-art. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 64:1–16
Masters P (2001) Geophysical survey of land at Wombwell Wood, Barnsley, South Yorkshire. Northamptonshire Archaeology, UK, 20 pp
Moffat A (2005) Before Scotland: the story of Scotland before history. Thames and Hudson, New York
National Park Service (1983) Archaeological and historic preservation: Secretary of the Interiors’ standards and guidelines. GPO, Washington, DC
Nickels PR (2000, August 20) The destruction of archaeological sites and data. National Park Service. http://www.cr.nps.gov/seac/protecting/html/3a-nickens.htm. Accessed 5 March 2013
Opitz RS (2013) An overview of airborne and terrestrial laser scanning in archaeology. In: Opitz RS, Cowley DC (eds) Interpreting archaeological topography: 3D data, visualisation and observation. Oxford Books, Oxford, pp 13–31
Stular B, Kikalj Z, Ostir K, Nuninger L (2012) Visualization of lidar-derived relief models for detection of archaeological features. J Archaeol Sci 39(11):3354–3360
Tacitus (109) The annals (trans: Church AJ, Brodribb WJ). http://classics.mit.edu/Tacitus/annals.html. Accesssed 1 April 2013
Tacitus (109) The histories (trans: Church AJ, BrodribbWJ). http://classics.mit.edu/Tacitus/histories.html. Accesssed 1 April 2013
The American Society for Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing (2013) LAS specification version 1.4 - R13. ASPRS, Bethesda
Thorne RM (1990) Revegitation: the soft approach to archaeological site stabilization. DOI Departmental Consulting Archaeologist/NPS Archarology Program, Washington, DC
Tolley L (2012, June 5) UH research team uses airborne LiDAR to unveil possible Honduran archaeological ruins. University of Houston. Accessed 1 February 2013
Trier OD, Pilo LH (2012) Automatic detection of pit structures in airborne laser scanning data. Archaeol Prospect 19:103–121
UK Forestry Commission (2013) Woodland heritage services. Forestry Commission. http://www.forestry.gov.uk/fr/woodlandheritageservices. Accessed 27 April 2013
Yakan-Simen F, Nezry E, Ewing J (1998) The legendary lost city “Ciudad Blanca” found under tropical forest in Honduras, using ERS-2 and JERS-1 SAR imagery. SPIE Int Soc Opt Photonics 3496:21–28
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Peter Crow and the UK Forestry Commission for their generous donation of the LiDAR data for Wombwell Wood. We would like to recognize rapidlasso for their LASTools suite of LiDAR data-processing software tools developed by Martin Isenburg. Additionally, we thank the reviewers for their constructive comments which guided the improvement of this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schindling, J., Gibbes, C. LiDAR as a tool for archaeological research: a case study. Archaeol Anthropol Sci 6, 411–423 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-014-0178-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-014-0178-3