Skip to main content
Log in

LiDAR as a tool for archaeological research: a case study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Airborne light detection and ranging (LiDAR) is a technology that offers the ability to create highly detailed digital terrain models (DTMs) that expose low relief topographic features. The availability of these models holds potential to augment archaeological field research by producing visual imagery that can used to identify traces of ancient anthropogenic activity. This capability is particularly useful in hard to access areas and in areas of dense vegetation, where manual surveys are difficult to plan and to execute. Additionally, LiDAR technology is nonintrusive so that initial surveys can be performed without altering or destroying the integrity of the landscape and any features that it may contain. This paper explores the use of LiDAR within the field of archaeology and uses a case study approach to investigate the potential of LiDAR data for identifying earthworks dating back to the pre-Roman period in central England. Additionally, an evaluation of a technique to enhance the imagery in order to facilitate detecting human activity on the landscape is undertaken. Vegetation cover, particularly during leaf-on periods, can interfere with the ability of LiDAR to penetrate to the surface and can therefore impact its accuracy. The effect of vegetation cover on the ability of LiDAR to produce accurate DTMs is evaluated in relationship to its impact on the identification of archaeological features.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (2000) 36 CFR PART 800 — protection of historic properties. GPO, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber M (2011) A history of aerial photography and archaeology. English Heritage, Swindon

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett R, Welham K, Hill RA Ford A (2011) Making the most of airborne remote sensing techniques for archaeological survey and interpretation. In: Cowley DC (ed) Remote sensing for archaeological heritage management. EAC Occasional Paper No. 5, 99–106

  • Bennett R, Welham K, Hill RA, Ford A (2012) A comparison of visualization techniques for models created from airborne laser scanned data. Archaeol Prospect 19:41–48. doi:10.1002/arp.1414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Challis K, Howard AJ (2013) The role of lidar intensity data in interpreting environmental and cultural archaeological landscapes. In: Opitz RS, Cowley DC (eds) Interpreting archaeological topography: 3D data, visualisation and observation. Oxford Books, Oxford, pp 161–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase AF, Chase DZ, Fisher CT, Leisz SJ, Weshampel JF (2012) Geospatial revolution and remote sensing LiDAR in Mesoamerican archaeology. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109(32):12916–12921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe (1992, January 16) European Convention on the Protection of the Archaeological Heritage. Council of Europe’s Treaty Office: http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/EN/Treaties/Html/143.htm. Accessed 7 January 2014

  • Cowley DC (2012, October) In with the new, out with the old? Auto-extraction for remote sensing archaeology. SPIE Remote Sens 853206–853206

  • Crow P (2004) Trees and forestry on archaeological sites in the UK: a review document. UK Forestry Commission

  • Crutchley S, Crow P (2010) The light fantastic: Using airborne lidar in archaeological survey. English Heritage, Swindon

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunliffe BW (1978) Iron Age communities in Britain, 2nd edn. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Devereux BJ, Amable GS, Crow P (2008) Visualisation of LiDAR terrain models for archaeological feature detection. Antiquity 82(316):470–479

    Google Scholar 

  • Doneus M, Briese C, Fera M, Janner M (2008) Archaeological prospection of forested areas using full-waveform airborne laser scanning. J Archaeol Sci 35:882–893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field D (2009) Celtic fields. In: Pollard J, Pollard J (eds) Prehistoric Britain. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, pp 207–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher JM, Josephs RL (2008) Using LiDAR to detect cultural resources in a forested environment: an example from Isle Royale Nationl Park, Michigan, USA. Archaeol Prospect 15(3):187–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harding DW (2004) The Iron Age in Northern Britain: Celts and Romans, natives and invaders. Routledge, Milton Park

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harmon JM, Leone MP, Prince SD, Snyder M (2006) LiDAR for archaeological landscape analysis: a case study of two eighteenth-century Maryland plantation sites. Am Antiq 71(4):649–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckenberger MJ, Kuikuro A, Kuikuro UT, Russell JC, Schmidt M, Fausto C, Franchetto B (2003) Amazonia 1492: Pristine forest or cultural parkland. Science 301:1710–1713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Her Majesty’s Government (2013) The government’s statement on the historic environment for England. Department for Culture, Media & Sports

  • Hesse R (2010) LiDAR-derived local relief models — a new tools for archaeological prospection. Archaeol Prospect 17:67–72. doi:10.1002/arp.374

    Google Scholar 

  • Humme A, Lindenbergh R, Sueur C (2006) Revealing celtic fields from LiDAR data using kriging based filtering. Proc ISPRS Comm V Symp 35:25–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson R (2009) Later prehistoric landscapes and inhabitation. In: Pollard J, Pollard J (eds) Prehistoric Britain. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, pp 274–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvamme K (2003) Geophysical surveys as landscape archaeology. Am Antiq 68(3):435–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kvamme KL, Ahler SA (2007) Integrated remote sensing and excavation at Double Ditch State Historic Site, North Dakota. Am Antiq 72(3):539–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lasaponara R, Coluzzi R, Masini N (2011) Flights into the past: full-waveform airborne laser scanning data for archaeological investigation. J Archaeol Sci 38:2061–2070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipe WD (2000, Spring) Conserving the in situ archaeological record. Conserv Perspect GCI Newsl 15

  • Mallet C, Bretar F (2009) Full-waveform topographic lidar: state-of-the-art. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 64:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masters P (2001) Geophysical survey of land at Wombwell Wood, Barnsley, South Yorkshire. Northamptonshire Archaeology, UK, 20 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffat A (2005) Before Scotland: the story of Scotland before history. Thames and Hudson, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • National Park Service (1983) Archaeological and historic preservation: Secretary of the Interiors’ standards and guidelines. GPO, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickels PR (2000, August 20) The destruction of archaeological sites and data. National Park Service. http://www.cr.nps.gov/seac/protecting/html/3a-nickens.htm. Accessed 5 March 2013

  • Opitz RS (2013) An overview of airborne and terrestrial laser scanning in archaeology. In: Opitz RS, Cowley DC (eds) Interpreting archaeological topography: 3D data, visualisation and observation. Oxford Books, Oxford, pp 13–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Stular B, Kikalj Z, Ostir K, Nuninger L (2012) Visualization of lidar-derived relief models for detection of archaeological features. J Archaeol Sci 39(11):3354–3360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tacitus (109) The annals (trans: Church AJ, Brodribb WJ). http://classics.mit.edu/Tacitus/annals.html. Accesssed 1 April 2013

  • Tacitus (109) The histories (trans: Church AJ, BrodribbWJ). http://classics.mit.edu/Tacitus/histories.html. Accesssed 1 April 2013

  • The American Society for Photogrammetry & Remote Sensing (2013) LAS specification version 1.4 - R13. ASPRS, Bethesda

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne RM (1990) Revegitation: the soft approach to archaeological site stabilization. DOI Departmental Consulting Archaeologist/NPS Archarology Program, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolley L (2012, June 5) UH research team uses airborne LiDAR to unveil possible Honduran archaeological ruins. University of Houston. Accessed 1 February 2013

  • Trier OD, Pilo LH (2012) Automatic detection of pit structures in airborne laser scanning data. Archaeol Prospect 19:103–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UK Forestry Commission (2013) Woodland heritage services. Forestry Commission. http://www.forestry.gov.uk/fr/woodlandheritageservices. Accessed 27 April 2013

  • Yakan-Simen F, Nezry E, Ewing J (1998) The legendary lost city “Ciudad Blanca” found under tropical forest in Honduras, using ERS-2 and JERS-1 SAR imagery. SPIE Int Soc Opt Photonics 3496:21–28

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Peter Crow and the UK Forestry Commission for their generous donation of the LiDAR data for Wombwell Wood. We would like to recognize rapidlasso for their LASTools suite of LiDAR data-processing software tools developed by Martin Isenburg. Additionally, we thank the reviewers for their constructive comments which guided the improvement of this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James Schindling.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schindling, J., Gibbes, C. LiDAR as a tool for archaeological research: a case study. Archaeol Anthropol Sci 6, 411–423 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-014-0178-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-014-0178-3

Keywords

Navigation