Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Integration between morphometric parameters, hydrologic model, and geo-informatics techniques for estimating WADI runoff (case study WADI HALYAH—Saudi Arabia)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In arid and semiarid areas, the only surface and groundwater recharge source is the runoff generated through flash floods. Lack of hydrological data in such areas makes runoff estimation extremely complicated. Flash floods are considered catastrophic phenomena posing a major hazardous threat to cities, villages, and their infrastructures. The objective of this study is to assess the flash flood hazard and runoff in Wadi Halyah and its sub-basins. Integration of morphometric parameters, geo-informatics, and hydrological models has been done to overcome the challenge of scarcity of data.

Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection (ASTER) data was used to prepare a digital elevation model (DEM) with 30-m resolution, and geographical information system (GIS) was used in the evaluation of network, geometry, texture, and relief features of the morphometric parameters. Thirty-eight morphometric parameters were estimated and have been linked together for producing nine effective parameters for evaluation of the flash flood hazard in the study basin.

Flash flood hazard in Wadi Halyah and its sub-basins was identified and grouped into three classes depending on nine effective parameters directly influencing the flood prone areas. Calculated runoff volume of Wadi Halyah ranges from 26.7 × 106 to 111.4 × 106 m3 with an inundation area of 15 and 27 km2 at return periods of 5 and 100 years, respectively. Mathematical relationships among rainfall depth, runoff volume, infiltration losses, and rainfall excess demonstrate a strong directly proportional relationships with correlation coefficient of about 0.99.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al Saud M (2009) Morphometric analysis of Wadi Aurnah drainage system, western Arabian peninsula. Open Hydrol J 3:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Cater, FW, Johnson, PR (1987) Geologic map of Jabal Ibrahim quadrangle; sheet 20 E, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Ministry of Petroleum and Mineral Resources, Deputy Ministry for Mineral Resources GM-96 C, scale 1:250,000.

  • Chorley RJ, Morley LSD (1959) A simplified approximation for the hypsometric integral. J Geol 67:566–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chorley RJ, Malm DEC, Pogorzelski HA (1957) A new standard for measuring drainage basin shape. Am J Sci 255:138–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chow VT, Maidment DR, Mays L (1988) Applied hydrology. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis JC (1975) Statistics and data analysis in geology. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawod G, Mirza M, Al-Ghamdi K (2011) GIS-based spatial mapping of flash flood hazard in Makkah city, Saudi Arabia. J Geogr Inf Syst 3:217–223

    Google Scholar 

  • El Bastawesy M, White KH, Gabr S (2013) Hydrology and geomorphology of the upper White Nile Lakes and their relevance for water resources management in the Nile basin. Hydrol Process 27:196–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faniran A (1968) The index of drainage intensity—a provisional new drainage factor. Australian. Journal of Science 31:328–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernadez D, Lutz M (2010) Urban flood hazard zoning in Tucumán Province, Argentina, using GIS and multicriteria decision analysis. Eng Geol 111(1–4):90–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory KJ, Walling DE (1973) Drainage basin form and process. John Wiley and Sons, New York, p. 456

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory KJ, Walling DE (1985) Drainage Basin Form and Process; A Geomorphological approach: 47–54

  • Gupta BL (1999) Engineering Hydrology, 3rd Ed. Runoff: 46–56

  • Guzzetti F, Tonelli G (2004) Information system on hydrological and geomorphological catastrophes in Italy (SICI): a tool for managing landslide and flood hazards. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 4:213–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haan CT, Johnson HP (1966) Rapid determination of hypsometric curves. Geol Soc Am Bull 77:123–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haggett P (1965) Locational analysis in human geography 339. Edward Arnold Ltd, London

  • He YP, Xie H, Cui P, Wei FQ, Zhong DL, Gardner JS (2003) GIS-based hazard mapping and zonation of debris flows in Xiaojiang Basin, southwestern China. Environ Geol 45(2):286–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horton RE (1932) Drainage basin characteristics. Transactions American Geophysical Union 13:350–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horton RE (1945) Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins, hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology. Geol Soc Am Bull 56:275–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard AD (1967) Drainage analysis in geologic interpretation: a summation. Am Assoc Pet Geol Bull 51(11):2246–2259

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurtrez JE, Sol C, Lucazeau F (1999) Effect of drainage area on the hypsometry from an analysis of small-scale drainage basins in the Siwalik Hills (central Nepal). Earth Surface Process and Landforms, 24: 799–808

  • Lykoudi E, Zanis D (2004) The influence of drainage network formation and characteristics over a catchment′s sediment yield, Proceedings. Second International Conference on Fluvial Hydraulics-River Flow. University of Napoli -Federico II, Naples, Italy, pp 793–800, 2325 June

  • Majure JJ, Soenksen PJ (1991) Using a geographic information system to determine physical basin characteristics for use in flood-frequency equations, in Balthrop BH, Terry JE eds., U.S. Geological Survey National Computer Technology Meeting-Proceedings, Phoenix, Arizona, November 14–18, 1988: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 90–4162:31–40

  • Masoud M, Schumann S, Abdel Mogheeth S (2013) Estimation of groundwater recharge in arid, data scarce regions; an approach as applied in the el Hawashyia basin and Ghazala sub-basin (gulf of Suez, Egypt. Environmental Earth Sciences 69(1):103–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melton MA (1957) An analysis of the relation among elements of climate, surface properties and geomorphology, Tech. Rep. II, 102 pp., Office of Nav. Res., Dep. of Geol., Columbia Univ., New York

  • Melton MA (1965) The geomorphic and palaeoclimatic significance of alluvial deposits in southern Arizona. J Geol 73:1–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merzi N, Aktas MT (2000) Geographic information systems (GIS) for the determination of inundation maps of Lake Mogan, Turkey. Water Int 25(3):474–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller VC (1953) A quantitative geomorphic study of drainage basin characteristics in the Clinch Mountain area, Virginia and Tennessee. Project NR, Technical Report 3, Columbia Univ., Department of Geology, ONR, Geography Branch, New York, 389–042

  • Mueller JE (1968) An introduction to the hydraulic and topographic sinuosity Indexes1. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 58(2):371–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nageswararao K, Swarna LP, Arun KP, Hari KM (2010) Morphometric analysis of Gostani River basin in Andhra Pradesh state, India using spatial information technology. Int J Geom Geosci 1(2):79–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pareta K, Pareta U (2011a) Hydromorphogeological study of Karawan watershed using GIS and remote sensing techniques. International Scientific Research Journal 3(4):243–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Pareta K, Pareta U (2011b) Quantitative morphometric analysis of a watershed of Yamuna Basin, India using ASTER (DEM) data and GIS. International Journal of Geomatics and Geosciences 2(1):248–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Pike RJ, Wilson SE (1971) Elevation-relief ratio, hypsometric integral and geomorphic area altitude analysis. Geol Soc Am Bull 82:1079–1084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prinz WC (1983) Geologic map of the Al Qunfudah quadrangle, sheet 19 E, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Ministry of Petroleum and Mineral Resources, Deputy Ministry for Mineral Resources GM-70, scale 1:250,000

  • Rudriaih M, Govindaiah S, Srinivas VS (2008) Morphometry using remote sensing techniques in the sub-basins of Kagna River basin, Gulburga District, Karnataka, India. J Indian Soc. Remote Sens 36(12):351–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanyal J, Lu X (2006) GIS-based flood hazard mapping at different administrative scales: a case study in Gangetic West Bengal, India. Singap J Trop Geogr 27:207–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumm SA (1956) Evolution of drainage system and slope in badlands of Perth Amboy. New Jersey 67:597–546

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumm SA (1965) Geomorphic research: applications to erosion control in New Zealand. Soil and Water (Soil Conservation and Rivers Control Council) 1:21–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh O, Sarangi A, Sharma M (2008) Hypsometric integral estimation methods and its relevance on erosion status of north-western lesser Himalayan watersheds. Water Resour Manag 22(11):1545–1560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soil Conservation Service (now called Natural Resources Conservation Service). Department of Agriculture. Technical Release 55: Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds. June 1986. Available on the web at http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/stelprdb1044171.pdf

  • Soil Conservation Service SCS (now called Natural Resources Conservation Service), 1972. Hydrology guide for use in watershed planning. SCS National engineering handbook, Section 4: Hydrology, Supplement A. US Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Engineering Division, Washington

  • Soil Conservation Service SCS (now called Natural Resources Conservation Service), 1985. National engineering handbook, Section 4: Hydrology, US Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Engineering Division, Washington

  • Strahler AN (1952) Hypsometric analysis of erosional topography. Bull Geol Soc Am 63:1117–1142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strahler AN (1957) Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Transactions American Geophysical Union 38:913–920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strahler AN (1964) Quantitative geomorphology of drainage basins and channel networks. Handbook of applied hydrology. McGraw Hill Book Company, New York, p. 411

    Google Scholar 

  • Sui DZ, Maggio RC (1999) Integrating GIS with hydrological modeling: practices, problems, and prospects. Comput Environ Urban Syst 23:33–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viessman W, Knapp JW, Lewis GL, Harbauqh TE (1977) Introduction to Hydrology. Happer & Row Publishers

  • Zaidi F, Nazzal Y, Ahmed I, Naeem M, Jafri M (2015) Identification of potential artificial groundwater recharge zones in northwestern Saudi Arabia using GIS and Boolean logic. J Afr Earth Sci 111:156–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zerger A, Smith DI (2003) Impediments to using GIS for real-time disaster decision support. Comput Environ Urban Syst 27:123–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Milad Masoud.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Water Resources in Arid Areas

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Basahi, J., Masoud, M. & Zaidi, S. Integration between morphometric parameters, hydrologic model, and geo-informatics techniques for estimating WADI runoff (case study WADI HALYAH—Saudi Arabia). Arab J Geosci 9, 610 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-016-2649-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-016-2649-6

Keywords

Navigation