Skip to main content
Log in

Simplified sediment yield index model incorporating parameter curve number

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Runoff sediment process modeling is highly variable and nonlinear in nature. In the present study, an attempt has been made to develop a relationship between Soil Conservation Service Curve Number (SCS-CN) and Sedimen Yield Index (SYI) for the Narmada watersheds (Madhya Pradesh). Only area (A), delivery ratio (DR), and curve number (CN) were used as input for model development. High value of Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency of (η) 98.60 and 88.19 % for Shakkar watershed and for combined watersheds, respectively, shows that the proposed simplified SYI model is found to be suitable for the study area. The resulting higher (0.98 for Shakkar and 0.88 for combined watersheds) coefficient of determination (R 2) values strongly support the versatility of the derived relationship and invokes assessment of SYI from the available National Engineering Handbook (NEH-4) CN values. Thus, the prediction of SYI is important in order to adopt the suitable soil conservation measure in the study watershed for minimizing the soil erosion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AISLUS (1977) Priority delineation, Matatilla RVP, U.P Report No.Agri.484

  • AISLUS (1991) Methodology of Priority Delineation Survey, All India Soil & Land Use Survey Technical Bulletin 9. Department of Agriculture and Cooperation, New Delhi, India

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagarello V, Ferro V, Giordano G (1991) Contributo alia valutazione del fattore di deflusso di Williams e del coefficiente di resa solida per alcuni bacini idrografici siciliani. Rivista di Ingegneria Agraria, Anno XXII(4), 238–251 (in Italian).

  • Brath A, Castellarin A, Montanari A (2002) Assessing the effect of land-use changes on annual average gross erosion. Hydrol Eart Syst Sci 6:255–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhary RS, Sharma PD (1998) Erosion hazard assessment and treatment prioritization of Giri river catchment, North Western Himalayas. Indian J Soil Conserv 26(1):6–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Church M, Slaymaker O (1989) Disequilibrium of Holocene sediment yield in glaciated British Columbia. Nature 337:452–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Vente J, Poesen J (2005) Predicting soil erosion and sediment yield at the basin scale: scale issues and semi-quantitative models. Earth Sci Rev 71:95–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dedkov A (2004) The relationship between sediment yield and drainage basin area. In: Sediment transfer through the fluvial system, 288th edn. IAHS Publishing, USA, pp 197–204, (Proceedings of a symposium held in Moscow, August 2004

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferro V, Minacapilli M (1995) Sediment delivery processes at basin scale. Hydrol Sci J 40(6): 703–717

    Google Scholar 

  • Flaxman (1971) Sediment yield Predictive Equation,Soil Conservation Service, Technical Service Centre Advisory –POI. U.S.D.A, Washington D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • Garde RJ, Kothari UC (1987) Sediment yield estimation. J Irrig Power (India) 44(3):97–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Grauso S, De Bonis P, Fattoruso G, Onori F, Pagano A, Regina P, Tebano C (2008) Relations between climatic-geomorphological parameters and suspended sediment yield in a Mediterranean semi-arid area (Sicily, southern Italy). Environ Geol 54:219–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ichim I, Radoane M (1987) A multivariate statistical analysis of sediment yield and prediction in Romania. In: Ahnert F (ed) Geomorphological models: theoretical and empirical aspects. Catena Suppl 10:137–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S (1985) Reservoir sedimentation in Proc. Short term course on planning, design and operation of reservoir. Patna University, India, p 8

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A, Sharma HC, Singh R, Prasad S (2011) Modelling of spring discharge in mid hills of North West Himalaya. Indian Journal of Soil Conservation 39(2), 95–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Magalie D, Olivier C, Jean-Marie M, Manuel G (2009) A method for developing a large-scale sediment yield index for European river basins. J Soils Sediments 9:613–626. doi:10.1007/s11368-009-0126-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) (2001) Section 4: Hydrology.” National Engineering Handbook, Natural Resources Conservation Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC

  • Ouyang D, Bartholic J (1997) Predicting sediment delivery ratio in Saginaw Bay watershed. 22nd National Association of Environmental Professionals Conference Proceedings. 19–23 May 1997, Orlando, pp 659–671

  • Patel DP, Dholakia MB, Naresh N, Srivastava PK (2012) Water harvesting structure positioning by using geovisualization concept and prioritization of mini-watersheds through morphometric analysis in the lower Tapi basin. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 40(2):299–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponce VM, Hawkins RH (1996) Runoff curve number: has it reached maturity? J Hydrol Eng ASCE 1:11–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyasi SK, Singh JK (2004) Sediment prediction by modelling runoff sediment process. Indian J Soil Conserv 32(2):100–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Rallison RE (1980) “Origin and evolution of the SCS runoff equation.” Proc., Symp. on Watershed Management, Vol. II, ASCE, Reston, VA, 912–924

  • Rao HSS, Mahabaleswara H (1990) Prediction of the rate of sedimentation of Tungabhadra reservoir, Proc. Sym. On Erosion, Sedimentaion and Resource Conservation, Dehradun, India, Vol. 1, pp 12–20

  • Sarma S, Saikia T (2012) Prioritization of sub-watersheds in Khanapara–Bornihat area of Assam–Meghalaya (India) based on land use and slope analysis using remote sensing and GIS. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 40(3):435–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiefer E, Slaymaker O, Klinkenberg B (2001) Physiographically controlled allometry of specific sediment yield in the Canadian cordillera: a lake sediment-based approach. Geogr Ann 83:55–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh VP, Yadava RN (2003) Watershed Management. Allied publisher private limited. ISBN 81-7764-545-5

  • Soil Conservation Service (1956) Hydrology. National Engineering Handbook, Supplement A, Section 4, Chapter 10. Soil Conservation Service, USDA, Washington, D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • Suresh M, Sudhakar S, Tiwari KN, Chowdary VM (2004) Prioritization of watersheds using morphometric parameters and assessment of surface water potential using remote sensing. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 32(3):249–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TT ENERGY PVT. LTD (2010) Environmental management plan of Ting Ting, H.E. project. Sikkim., Project Report, August, pp 12

  • Vanoni VA (1975) Sediment deposition engineering. ASCE Manuals and Reports on Engineering Practices, p 54

  • Walling DE (1983) The sediment delivery problem. J Hydrol 65:209–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams JR, Berndt HD (1972) Sediment yield computed with universal equation. J Hydraul Div ASCE 98:2087–2098, HY2

    Google Scholar 

  • Wischmeier WH, Smith DD (1978) Predicting rainfall-erosion losses - a guide to conservation planning. AH-537. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarita Gajbhiye.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gajbhiye, S., Mishra, S.K. & Pandey, A. Simplified sediment yield index model incorporating parameter curve number. Arab J Geosci 8, 1993–2004 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-014-1319-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-014-1319-9

Keyword

Navigation