Skip to main content
Log in

Informal Learning at Stonehammer and English Riviera Geoparks

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Geoheritage Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Geoparks are a relatively new concept with the Global Geopark Network being established in 2004, and extensive data has not yet been collected from geopark visitors to determine if these sites contribute to public awareness of geological topics. In many ways, geoparks are similar to zoos and museums and serve as centres for informal learning. They provide geological, historical and cultural stories and allow scientists to contribute to informal learning by communicating their research to the general public in an understandable fashion using a variety of methods. One mandate of the UNESCO-supported Global Geopark Network is the promotion of geoeducation. Geopark visitors who are science literate are better able to fully appreciate and understand geological significance. In the current study, we surveyed visitors’ awareness and knowledge of the geopark and geology/earth science and compared responses from visitors at a newly established Global Geopark (Stonehammer, Canada) and an established Global Geopark in England (English Riviera). Regardless of the fact that the English Riviera Geopark was more mature and therefore had more opportunity to develop and promote its educational programmes, the results of the current study did not indicate that there was a higher awareness and/or knowledge levels among geopark visitors to an established geopark. This may simply be a result of the hype and attention given to the establishment of a new “attraction” in a community and, if so, would confirm the importance of continuous promotion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anonymous (1823, December 20) New Brunswick Courier p 3

  • Azman N, Halim SA, Liu OP, Saidin S, Komoo I (2010) Public education in heritage conservation for geopark community. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 7:504–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buhay DN, Miller RF (2010) The Natural History Society of New Brunswick library: supporting geological science. Earth Sci Hist 29(1):146–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buhay DN, Best LA, Miller RF (2011) Stonehammer Geopark: evolving strategies for communicating the message. In: Rangnes K (ed) Proceedings of the 10th European Geoparks Conference, September 16–18, European Geoparks Network, Porsgrunn, Norway, p 133

  • Bybee RW (2001) Achieving scientific literacy: strategies for insuring that free-choice science education complements national formal science education efforts. In: Falk JH (ed) Free-choice education: how we learn science outside of school. Teachers College Press, New York, pp 44–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane V, Chen M (1994) Informal science learning: what the research says about television, science museums, and community-based projects. Science Press, Ephrata

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowling R (2011) Geotourism’s global growth. Geotourism 3:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Durant J, Evans G, Thomas G (1989) The public understanding of science. Nature 340:11–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earth Science Literacy Initiative (2009) Earth science literacy principles: the big ideas and supporting concepts of earth science. http://www.earthscienceliteracy.org/document.html. Accessed 26 June 2013

  • European Commission (2005) Special Eurobarometer 224: Europeans, science and technology. European Commission, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk JH, Storksdieck M, Dierking LD (2007) Investigating public science interest and understanding: evidence for the importance of free-choice learning. Public Underst Sci 16:455–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Global Geoparks Network (2013) Distribution of GGN members. http://www.globalgeopark.org/homepageaux/tupai/6513.htm. Accessed 26 June 2013

  • Hackling M, Goodrum D, Rennie L (2001) The state of science in Australian secondary schools. Aust Sci Teach J 47(4):6–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Haddad W (1990) Meeting basic learning needs: a vision for the 1990s. Inter-Agency Commission (UNDP, UNESCO, UNICEF, WORLD BANK) for the World Conference on Education for All, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstein A, Rosenfeld S (1996) Bridging the gap between formal and informal science learning. Stud Sci Educ 28:87–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howarth O (1922) The British association for the advancement of science: a retrospect 1831–1921. British Association, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu X (2009) Beyond science literacy: science and the public. Int J Environ Sci Educ 4(3):301–311

    Google Scholar 

  • McNamara K (1999) Sedgwick, Adam. In: Encyclopedia of paleontology. Fitzroy Dearborn Publishers. http://www.credoreference.com.proxy.hil.unb.ca/entry/routpaleont/sedgwick_adam. Accessed 26 June 2013

  • Miller JD (1983) Scientific literacy: a conceptual and empirical review. Daedalus, 112(2):29–48. http://www.jstor.org. Accessed 26 June 2013

  • National Research Council (2009) Learning science in informal environments: people, places, and pursuits. The National Academies Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Board (2012) Science and engineering indicators 2012. National Science Foundation (NSB 12-01), Arlington

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2010) PISA 2009 at a glance. OECD Publishing, Paris. doi:10.1787/9789264095298-en. Accessed 15 Nov 2012

  • Poria Y, Biran A, Reichel A (2009) Visitors’ preferences for interpretation at heritage sites. J Travel Res 48(1):92–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powling M (2003) Deep time in Kents Cavern. Hist Today 53(8):3–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Royal Society (1985) The public understanding of science. Royal Society, London

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (2009) Global Geoparks Network. UNESCO http://portal.unesco.org. Accessed 22 Oct 2012

  • United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (2010) Guidelines and Criteria for national geoparks seeking UNESCO’s assistance to join the Global Geoparks Network. http://www.globalgeopark.org. Accessed 15 July 2013

  • Zouros N (2004) The European Geoparks Network: geological heritage protection and local development. Episodes 27(3):165–171

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors appreciate the financial support provided through the University of New Brunswick University Research Fund. As well, the authors would like to thank the Boards and staff of Stonehammer Geopark and the English Riviera Geopark. We would also like to thank two anonymous reviewers for their thoughtful comments on our original draft.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diane N. Buhay.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Buhay, D.N., Best, L.A. Informal Learning at Stonehammer and English Riviera Geoparks. Geoheritage 7, 165–175 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-014-0125-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-014-0125-9

Keywords

Navigation