Skip to main content
Log in

Damage Assessment of Sugarcane Whitefly Neomaskellia andropogonis Corbett and Population Dynamics on Seven Commercial Varieties in Southwest of Iran

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Sugar Tech Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sugarcane is an important industrial crop in Iran, and this crop is vulnerable to attack by several arthropod pest species. Sugarcane whitefly Neomaskellia andropogonis (Corbett) (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) is a relatively new emerging pest which affect sugarcane fields in late summer. Field trials were carried out during early September until late November 2015 at Salman Farsi Agro-Industry, Ahwaz, Iran. Seven sugarcane varieties, CP69-1062, CP57-614, SP70-1143, CP73-21, IRC99-01, CP48-103 and IRC99-02, were tested in these trials. The field trials were conducted in a randomized block design with five replications. In each sampling date, 15 whole stalk of each variety plot (75 whole stalks for each variety) were selected randomly at different parts of plot for damage assessment. The percent of infested stalks and leaves, the number of adults, pupa and nymphs were assessed. Then, the parasitism rate of Encarsia inaron Walker and Eretmocerus delhiensis Mani on nymphal stages were assessed. The results showed that there were significant differences among varieties on percent of infested stalks and leaves. CP69-1062 was the most susceptible variety compared the others to whitefly damage with 47.3 and 32.8 % stalk and leaf damage at 5 November, respectively. In addition, the highest population peaks of whitefly (different stages) were recorded in CP69-1062. The population increased with the increase in relative humidity until 21 October, but then decreased as the temperature decreased. The results on parasitism level indicated that percent of parasitism was increased during sampling time and E. inaron was more frequent than E. delhiensis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

(Photograph credit: A. Nikpay)

Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ananthanarayana, K., K. Salin, Y.S. Goud, and K.S. Bai. 1994. Amitus Minervae Silvestri, a potential parasitoid of the sugarcane whitefly Aleurolobus barodensis Maskell. Journal of Biological Control 8: 5–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Askarianzadeh, A. 2011. Evaluation of damage by sugarcane whitefly Neomaskellia andropogonis (Hom., Aleyrodidae) in sugarcane fields in Khuzestan. Plant Protection 34: 59–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Askarianzadeh, A., and S. Manzari. 2006. Neomaskellia andropogonis (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae), a new genus and species record for Iran. Journal of Entomological Society of Iran 26: 13–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhavani, B., and D.C.V.N. Rao. 2013. Management of sugarcane white fly (Aleurolobus barodensis mask.) in north coastal districts of Andhra pradesh, india. International Journal of Social Science & Interdisciplinary Research 2: 112–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charernsom, K., and W. Suasa-ard. 1989. Sugarcane whitefly, Aleurolobus barodensis Maskell, and its parasites in Thailand. In Proceedings XX congress of the international society of sugar cane technologists 769–802.

  • Chaudhary, O., and S. Jaipal. 2006. Evaluation of new insecticides for controlling white fly in sugarcane. Cooperative Sugar 38: 37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goebel, F.R., and N. Sallam. 2011. New pest threats for sugarcane in the new bioeconomy and how to manage them. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 3: 81–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inayatullah, C. 1984. Sugar-cane aleurodids, Aleurolobus barodensis (Maskell) and Neomaskellia andropogonis Corbett (Hom.: Aleyrodidae), and their natural enemies in Pakistan. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science 5: 279–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, G. 2004. Sugarcane, 2nd ed. London/Britain: Blackwell Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jena, B.C., and N. Nayak. 1994. Whitefly management in sugarcane. Indian Sugar 43: 849–850.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khadempour, A., P. Shishehbor, A. Rasekh, and G. Evans. 2014. Report of the parasitoid wasp Eretmocerus delhiensis (Hym.: Aphelinidae) from Iran. Journal of Entomological Society of Iran 34: 17–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laycock, D.S. 2004. Manual for field trials in plant protection, 4th ed. Basel/Schwitzerland: Syngenta Agro.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malekmohammadi, A., P. Shishehbor, and F. Kocheili. 2012. Influence of constant temperatures on development, reproduction and life table parameters of Encarsia inaron (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) parasitizing Neomaskellia andropogonis (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). Crop Protection 34: 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, R., and K. Singh. 2003. Screening of sugarcane genotype for their reaction against sugarcane whitefly (Aleurolobus barodensis Mask.). Indian Sugar 23: 110–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masood, N., M. Ashfaq, A. Ali, M. Ahsan, and N. Jved. 2011. Whitefly (Aleurolobus barodensis mask.) population fluctuation in diverse spatio-temporal conditions on sugarcane crop native to Pakistan. International Research Journal of Plant Science 2: 179–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minaei-Moghadam, M., P. Shishebor, E. Soleyman-Nejadian, and A. Askarianzadeh. 2010. Seasonal population changes of Neomaskellia andropogonis Corbett (Hom.: Aleyrodidae) in south Khuzestan. Plant Protection 32: 15–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minaei Moghadam, M. 2008. Investigation of population dynamism and biology of sugarcane whitefly, Neomaskellia andropogonis Corbett. In: Department of Plant Protection, Shahid Chamran University, Ahvaz, Iran.

  • Mound, L.A., and S.H. Halsey. 1978. Whitefly of the world. A systematic catalogue of the Aleyrodidae (Homoptera) with host plant and natural enemy data. London: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Narasimha-Rao, C., V. Bhavani, B. Venugopala-Rao, and N.V. Naidu. 2011. Management of whitefly (Aleurolobus barodensis Mask.) in sugarcane agro-ecosystem. Pestology 35: 67–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandya, H. 2005. Population status and management of sugarcane whitefly (Aleurolobus barodensis Mask.) in Gujrat. Cooperative Sugar 36: 479–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsana, G., P. Butani, and M. Kapadia. 1995. Preference of the sugarcane whitefly and its pathogenic fungus to different promising varieties. Indian Sugar 45: 239–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pastagia, J.J., M.B. Patel, and H.M. Patel. 2002. Conservation of naturally occurring aphelinid parasitoids of sugarcane, whitefly (Aleurolobus barodensis Mask.) using cages. Insect Environment 8: 153–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel, C., A. Rai, M. Patel, J. Pastagia, and H. Patel. 1995. Population status of sugarcane whitefly Aleurolobus Barodensis Mask (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) and its parasites in aerially sprayed and unsprayed areas of South Gujarat. Cooperative Sugar 26: 937–945.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajak, D., and A. Varma. 2001. Natural enemy complex of insect-pest of sugarcane in the southern zone of Andhra Pradesh. Indian Journal of Sugarcane Technology 16: 114–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadeghzadeh-Hemayati, S., H. Hamdi, D. Fathollah-Taleghani, and H. Amili. 2011. Strategic framework for sugarcane research. Tehran-Iran: Phsychology and Arts.

    Google Scholar 

  • SPSS. 2007. SPSS 16 for windows user’s guide release. Chicago: Spss Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thumar, R.K., and M.N. Kapadia. 1994. Susceptibility of sugarcane to Aleurolobus barodensts [barodensis](Maskell). Indian Sugar 44: 411–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thumar, R.K., and M.N. Kapadia. 1995. Biology and population dynamics of sugarcane whitefly, Aleurolobus barodensis Maskell under Junagadh conditions of Gujarat. Gujarat Agricultural University Research Journal 20: 103–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vemuri, S., K. Suresh, and M.V. Kumar. 2014. Whitefly (Aleurolobus Barodensis Mask.) population fluctuations in diverse conditions of sugarcane crop in Medak district of Andhra Pradesh, India. ZENITH International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research 4: 217–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vijayaraghavan, C., and A. Regupathy. 2006. Bioefficacy of thiamethoxam (ACTARA 25WG) against sugarcane whitefly Aleurolobus barodensis Maskell. International Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2: 299–304.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author is very thankful to technical staff of plant protection department at Salman Farsi Agro-Industry for technical support in field sampling. The efforts of two anonymous reviewers who critically read the manuscript and comments which improved the quality of this paper are highly appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amin Nikpay.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declared that he has no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nikpay, A. Damage Assessment of Sugarcane Whitefly Neomaskellia andropogonis Corbett and Population Dynamics on Seven Commercial Varieties in Southwest of Iran. Sugar Tech 19, 198–205 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-016-0451-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-016-0451-0

Keywords

Navigation