Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of Potential Fermentation Inhibitors Present in Sweet Sorghum Sugar Solutions

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Sugar Tech Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this work, the fermentation of the sweet sorghum sugars such as sucrose, glucose, and fructose to ethanol was studied in the presence of acetic acid, lactic acid, and aconitic acid, which are present in the juice or produced by microorganisms during prolonged storage of harvested materials or juice. An industrial strain of distiller’s yeast was used to produce ethanol from 100 g/L (83 g/L after inoculum) of total sugars. The fermentation time ranged from 12 to 140 h, with the longer fermentation time corresponding to clear inhibition of yeast growth and product accumulation in the presence of 8 g/L of initial acetic acid. Among the acids, only acetic acid showed a negative impact on the fermentation rates and only at levels greater than 2 g/L. Lower levels of acetic acid and all levels of lactic acid and aconitic acid (1–5 g/L) either showed an improvement in fermentation rates or in final ethanol concentration. The acidity was not controlled during the fermentation but was initially adjusted, and it is presumed that the pH buffering effect on the organic acids contributed to the higher fermentation rates and prevented the pH from naturally dropping as the fermentation progressed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Almodares, A., and M.R. Hadi. 2009. Production of bioethanol from sweet sorghum: A review. African Journal of Agricultural Research 4(9): 772–780.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amorim, H.V. 2015. Challenges to produce ethanol from sweet sorghum in Brazil. Presented at the sweet sorghum association 2015 annual conference, Orlando, FL.

  • Atkinson, B., and F. Mavituna. 1991. Biochemical engineering and biotechnology handbook, 2nd ed. New York: Stockton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basso, L.C., H.V. de Amorim, A.J. de Oliveira, and M.L. Lopes. 2008. Yeast selection for fuel ethanol production in Brazil. FEMS Yeast Research 8(7): 1155–1163.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Borole, A.P., J.R. Mielenz, T.A. Vishnivetskaya, and C.Y. Hamilton. 2009. Controlling accumulation of fermentation inhibitors in biorefinery recycle water using microbial fuel cells. Biotechnology for Biofuels. doi:10.1.1186/1754-6834-2-7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, L.J., J.L. Vega, K.T. Klasson, E.C. Clausen, and J.L. Gaddy. 1992. The effects of furfural on ethanol production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae in batch culture. Biomass and Bioenergy 3(1): 41–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Day, R.W., and G.P. Quinn. 1989. Comparisons of treatments after an analysis of variance in ecology. Ecological Monographs 59(4): 433–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eggleston, G., M. Cole, and B. Andrzejewski. 2013. New commercially viable processing technologies for the production of sugar feedstocks from sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) for manufacture of biofuels and bioproducts. Sugar Tech 15(3): 232–249.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eggleston, G., A. DeLucca, S. Sklanka, C. Dalley, E. St. Cyr, and R. Powell. 2015. Investigation of the stabilization and preservation of sweet sourghum juices. Industrial Crops and Products 64: 258–270.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eggleston, G., T. Tew, L. Panella, and T. Klasson. 2010. Ethanol from sugar crops. In Industrial crops and uses, ed. B.P. Singh, 60–83. Wallingford: CABI.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Essia Ngang, J.J., F. Letourneau, E. Wolniewicz, and P. Villa. 1990. Inhibition of beet molasses alcoholic fermentation by lactobacilli. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 33(5): 490–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garay-Arroyo, A., A.A. Covarrubias, I. Clark, I. Niño, G. Gosset, and A. Martinez. 2004. Response to different environmental stress conditions of industrial and laboratory Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 63(6): 734–741.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Govindaswamy, S., and L.M. Vane. 2007. Kinetics of growth and ethanol production on different carbon substrates using genetically engineered xylose-fermenting yeast. Bioresource Technology 98(3): 677–685.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Graves, T., N.V. Narendranath, K. Dawson, and R. Power. 2006. Effect of pH and lactic or acetic acid on ethanol productivity by Saccharomyces cerevisiae in corn mash. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology 33(6): 469–474.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, H.-J., S. Ramaswamy, U.W. Tschirner, and B.V. Ramarao. 2008. A review of separation technologies in current and future biorefineries. Separation and Purification Technology 62(1): 1–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, M., and D.F. Day. 2011. Composition of sugar cane, energy cane, and sweet sorghum suitable for ethanol production at Louisiana sugar mills. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology 38(7): 803–807.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klasson, K.T., B.S. Dien, and R.E. Hector. 2013. Simultaneous detoxification, saccharification, and ethanol fermentation of weak-acid hydrolyzates. Industrial Crops and Products 49: 292–298.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klinke, H.B., A.B. Thomsen, and B.K. Ahring. 2004. Inhibition of ethanol-producing yeast and bacteria by degradation products produced during pre-treatment of biomass. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 66(1): 10–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kwiatkowski, J.R., A.J. McAloon, F. Taylor, and D.B. Johnston. 2006. Modeling the process and costs of fuel ethanol production by the corn dry-grind process. Industrial Crops and Products 23(3): 288–296.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, C.G., P.S. Rao, S. Gupta, J. Malapaka, and A. Kamal. 2013. Enhancing the shelf life of sweet sorghum [Sorghum biocolor (L.) Moench] juice through pasteurization while sustaining fermentation efficiency. Sugar Tech 15(3): 328–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mussatto, S.I., and I.C. Roberto. 2004. Alternatives for detoxification of diluted-acid lignocellulosic hydrolyzates for use in fermentative processes: A review. Bioresource Technology 93(1): 1–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Narendranath, N.V., and R. Power. 2005. Relationship between pH and medium dissolved solids in terms of growth and metabolism of lactobacilli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae during ethanol production. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 71(5): 2239–2243.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Narendranath, N.V., K.C. Thomas, and W.M. Ingledew. 2001. Effects of acetic acid and lactic acid on the growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in a minimal medium. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology 26(3): 171–177.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Palmqvist, E., H. Grage, N.Q. Meinander, and B. Hahn-Hägerdal. 1999. Main and interaction effects of acetic acid, furfural, and p-hydroxybenzoic acid on growth and ethanol productivity of yeasts. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 63(1): 46–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pampulha, M.E., and M.C. Loureiro-Dias. 2000. Energetics of the effect of acetic acid on growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiology Letters 184(1): 69–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prasad, S., A. Singh, N. Jain, and H.C. Joshi. 2007. Ethanol production from sweet sorghum syrup for utilization as automotive fuel in India. Energy and Fuels 21(4): 2415–2420.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Savard, T., C. Beaulieu, N.J. Gardner, and C.P. Champagne. 2002. Characterization of spoilage yeasts isolated from fermented vegetables and inhibition by lactic, acetic and propionic acids. Food Microbiology 19(4): 363–373.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Serna-Saldivar, S.O., and W.L. Rooney. 2014. Production and supply logistics of sweet sorghum as an energy feedstock. In Sustainable bioenergy production, ed. L. Wang, 193–212. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Silveira, M.C.F., E.M.M. Oliveira, E. Carvajal, and E.P.S. Bon. 2000. Nitrogen regulation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae invertase: Role of the URE2 gene. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 84–86: 247–254.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taherzadeh, M.J., C. Niklasson, and G. Lidén. 1997. Acetic acid—Friend or foe in anaerobic batch conversion of glucose to ethanol by Saccharomyces cerevisiae? Chemical Engineering Science 52(15): 2653–2659.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, X., S. Staggenborg, J.L. Propheter, W.L. Rooney, J. Yu, and D. Wang. 2010. Features of sweet sorghum juice and their performance in ethanol fermentation. Industrial Crops and Products 31(1): 164–170.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank Mr. Larry Boihem, Jr., for assistance with chemical analysis. Mention of trade names or commercial products in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Thomas Klasson.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Dr. Klasson has nothing to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Klasson, K.T. Impact of Potential Fermentation Inhibitors Present in Sweet Sorghum Sugar Solutions. Sugar Tech 19, 95–101 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-016-0433-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-016-0433-2

Keywords

Navigation