Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Productivity, Profitability and Soil Properties Influenced by Planting Methods and Band Application of FYM in Autumn Sugarcane

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Sugar Tech Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to determine the effect of planting methods and band placement of FYM on autumn planted sugarcane at Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana during 2005–2006 and 2006–2007. Soil of the experimental site was loamy sand with normal pH and electrical conductivity, low in organic carbon, high in available phosphorus and medium in potassium. The treatments comprised of four planting methods (pit with recommended seed rate, pit with double seed rate, recommended conventional flat method with wheat intercrop and paired row trench method with wheat intercrop) and three doses (20, 15 and 10 t/ha) of farmyard manure (FYM) as band application. The treatments were evaluated in factorial randomized block design. The results revealed that pit method with both the seed rates gave higher cane yield than the recommended conventional flat method and paired row trench method with wheat intercrop. In the context of profitability, paired row trench and conventional flat method with wheat intercrop were better options than pit method. When compared, band application of different rates of FYM, the 15 t/ha of FYM produced the statistically similar cane yield as the recommended rate of 20 t/ha. Therefore band application can help in reducing the FYM rate from 20 to 15 t/ha.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bhullar, M.S., K.S. Thind, S.K. Uppal, and Kuldeep Singh. 2008. Productivity, propfitability and quality of sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) plant –ratoon system in relation to planting methods and seed rates. Indian Journal of Agronomy 53: 195–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jadhav, M.B., S.M. Jagtap, and R.V. Kulkarni. 2006. Response of suru sugarcane to different methods of fertilizer application and management practices (cv. Co 86032). Indian Sugar 56: 31–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muhammad, Sarwar, M.A. Gill, K.B. Malik, and M. Sarwar. 1996. Comparison of pit and trench planting of sugarcane at different fertilizer levels. Pakistan Sugar Journal 10: 11–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panje, R.R. 1971. Cultural methods of sugarcane production in subtropics. Proceedings of XIV Congress International Society of Sugar Cane Technology 1: 621–627.

  • Sastry, S.K., and A.V. Chari. 1960. Proceedings of 4th Bien Conference Sugarcane Research and Dev Workers, 145–159. India.

  • Singh, G.B. 2002. Management of plant population in sugarcane for higher productivity and quality. Proceedings of International Symposium on Food, Nutrition and Economic Security through Diversification in Sugarcane Production and Processing Systems, 9–18. IISR Lucknow. India, February 16–18, 2002, 9–18.

  • Singh, Kuldeep, M.S. Bhullar, Kulvir Singh, and S.K. Uppal. 2009. Effect of planting techniques for spring planted sugarcane. Journal Research Punjab Agricultural University 46: 138–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundara, B. 2002. Integrated nutrient management for sugarcane. Proceedings of 4th meeting of Sugarcane Research and Development Workers of Tamil Nadu, 14–15, June 2002, 11–21. Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Coimbatore.

  • Wetselaar, R., J.B. Passioura, and B.R. Singh. 1972. Consequences of banding nitrogen fertilizers in soil. Plant and Soil 36: 159–175.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yadav, R.L. 1991. Sugarcane production technology. Oxford & IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd New Delhi 110 001.

  • Yadav, R.L. 1992. High population density management in sugarcane. Proceedings of Indian National Science Academy B 57: 175–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yadav, R.L. 2004. Enhancing efficiency of fertilizer N use in sugarcane by ring pit method of planting. Sugar Tech 6: 169–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yadav, R.L., and R. Kumar. 2005. On farm comparison of ring-pit and conventional flat planting methods for yield and quality of sugarcane in northwest India. Indian Journal of Agriculture Science 75: 605–607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yadav, R.L., R. Kumar, and R.S. Verma. 1990. Effect of planting techniques and planting density on yield of late planted sugarcane in North Central India. Experimental Agriculture 27: 281–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kuldeep Singh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Singh, K., Singh, A., Choudhary, O.P. et al. Productivity, Profitability and Soil Properties Influenced by Planting Methods and Band Application of FYM in Autumn Sugarcane. Sugar Tech 15, 145–151 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-012-0183-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-012-0183-8

Keywords

Navigation