Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Capturing the macroeconomic impact of technology-based greenhouse gas mitigation in agriculture: a computable general equilibrium approach

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Operational Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The importance of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions related to agriculture is gaining momentum in the climate change policy debate, as evidenced by the European Effort Sharing Decision. Food production is important to economic sustainability in many regions and therefore GHG mitigation in agriculture will have notable macroeconomic implications. A theoretically consistent and tractable framework capturing the link between GHG abatement in primary food production and the wider economy is essential to GHG mitigation strategy development in such regions. Computable general equilibrium (CGE) models provide a straightforward approach to compare the economic and environmental impacts of price/quantity-type policy instruments to meet emission abatement obligations. However, capturing changes to emission intensity associated with agriculture is not nearly as developed in the CGE literature, which has focused on the energy sector. This paper considers alternative approaches to modelling abatement technology in a CGE framework, and illustrates an approach that utilizes standard models available to explore strategic implications of local–regional abatement options. The case study considered is Northern Ireland, a small regional economy with a relatively large proportion of economic activity related to the food supply chain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexeeva-Talebi V, Bohringer C, Loschel A, Voigt S (2012) The value-added of sectoral disaggregation: implications on competitive consequences of climate change policies. Energy Econ 34:S127–S142. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2012.10.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Böhringer C (1998) The synthesis of bottom-up and top-down in energy policy modeling. Energy Econ 20(3):233–248. doi:10.1016/s0140-9883(97)00015-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Böhringer C, Loschel A (2006) Promoting renewable energy in Europe: A hybrid computable general equilibrium approach. Energy J 27:135–150

  • Böhringer C, Rutherford TF (2008a) Combining bottom-up and top-down. Energy Econ 30(2):574–596. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2007.03.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Böhringer C, Rutherford TF (2008b) Combining top-down and bottom-up in energy policy analysis a decomposition approach. Center for European Economic Research, Mannheim

    Google Scholar 

  • Böhringer C, Rutherford TF (2009) Integrated assessment of energy policies: decomposing top-down and bottom-up. J Econ Dyn Control 33(9):1648–1661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burniaux JM, Truong TP (2002) GTAP-E: an energy-environmental version of the GTAP model. GTAP Technical Papers:18

  • Caron J (2012) Estimating carbon leakage and the efficiency of border adjustments in general equilibrium—Does sectoral aggregation matter? Energy Econ 34:S111–S126. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2012.08.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross-Departmental Working Group on Greenhouse Gas Emissions (2011) Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction Action Plan. Northern Ireland

  • European Commission (2012) Effort Sharing Decision. http://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/effort/index_en.htm. Accessed 24/10/2012 2012

  • Gohin A (2005) The specification of price and income elasticities in computable general equilibrium models: an application of latent separability. Econ Model 22(5):905–925. doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2005.06.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gohin A, Moschini G (2006) Evaluating the market and welfare impacts of agricultural policies in developed countries: comparison of partial and general equilibrium measures. Rev Agric Econ 28(2):195–211. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9353.2006.00281.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Lofgren H, Harris RL, Robinson S (2002) A standard computable general equilibrium (CGE) model in GAMS. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • Minihan ES, Wu Z (2011) A social accounting matrix suitable for agricultural and environmental policy analysis in Northern Ireland. Agri-food and Biosciences Institute

  • National Atmospheric Emissions Inventory (2012) Emission of the basket of 6 Kyoto GHGs according to Devolved Administration

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erin S. Minihan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Minihan, E.S., Wu, Z. Capturing the macroeconomic impact of technology-based greenhouse gas mitigation in agriculture: a computable general equilibrium approach. Oper Res Int J 14, 189–203 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-014-0157-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-014-0157-6

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation