Skip to main content
Log in

A multicenter evaluation of the appropriate use of single-photon emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging in Greece

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology Aims and scope

Abstract

Background

This study evaluates the appropriate use of myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) and determines patterns and variables associated with inappropriate testing.

Methods

Over a 10-month period data were collected prospectively from consecutive patients referred for MPI in four academic departments and an appropriate use grade was assigned (appropriate, uncertain, inappropriate, and unclassifiable scans) according to established criteria.

Results

Among 3,032 referrals appropriate MPI had 72.8% of patients and 19.2% of studies were inappropriate, the remaining being uncertain (7.2%) or unclassifiable (0.8%). In multivariate analysis the asymptomatic status (odds ratio 10.7, P < .001), good functional capacity (odds ratio 1.9, P < .001), an interpretable resting electrocardiogram (odds ratio 1.8, P = .004), an age <65 years (odds ratio 1.5, P = .001) and the absence of diabetes (odds ratio 1.7, P < .001) or dyslipidemia (odds ratio 1.3, P = .014) were independent predictors of inappropriate scintigraphy. The most common indication for inappropriate testing was the assessment of asymptomatic patients <2 years after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (38.9%).

Conclusions

The appropriate use of MPI is relatively high, but a considerable proportion of inappropriate scans is noted which is associated with markers of lower risk. The most common source of inappropriate testing is the assessment of asymptomatic patients <2 years after PCI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hendel RC. Utilization management of cardiovascular imaging: Precertification and appropriateness. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2008;1:241-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Orszag PR, Emanuel EJ. Health care reform and cost control. N Engl J Med 2010;363:601-3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen J, Einstein AJ, Fazel R, Krumholz HM, Wang Y, Ross JS, et al. Cumulative exposure to ionizing radiation from diagnostic and therapeutic cardiac imaging procedures. A population-based analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;56:702-11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Berrington de Gonzalez A, Kim K-P, Smith-Bindman R, McAreavey D. Myocardial perfusion scans: Projected population cancer risks from current levels of use in the United States. Circulation 2010;122:2403-10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fazel R, Dilsizian V, Einstein AJ, Ficaro EP, Henzlova M, Shaw LJ. Strategies for defining an optimal risk-benefit ratio for stress myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol 2011;18:385-92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hendel RC, Berman DS, Di Carli MF, Heidenreich PA, Henkin RE, Pellikka PA, et al. ACCF/ASNC/ACR/AHA/ASE/SCCT/SCMR/SNM 2009 appropriate use criteria for cardiac radionuclide imaging: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and the Society of Nuclear Medicine. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53:2201-29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Underwood SR, Wiener S. Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in Europe 2005. A survey of the European Council on Nuclear Cardiology. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2009;36:260-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Reyes E, Wiener S, Underwood SR. Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in Europe 2007: A survey of the European Council of Nuclear Cardiology. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2012;39:160-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Leal J, Luengo-Fernaández R, Gray A, Petersen S, Rayner M. Economic burden of cardiovascular diseases in the enlarged European Union. Eur Heart J 2006;27:1610-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Health at a Glance: Europe 2010. OECD Publishing. 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/health_glance-2010-en. Accessed 12 July 2012.

  11. European Commission, Eurostat, Health care expenditure. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/statistics_explained/index.php/Healthcare_expenditure. Accessed 14 July 2012.

  12. Gibbons RJ, Miller TD, Hodge D, Urban L, Araoz PA, Pellikka P, et al. Application of appropriateness criteria to stress single-photon emission computed tomography sestamibi studies and stress echocardiograms in an academic medical center. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:1283-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mehta R, Ward RP, Chandra S, Agarwal R, Williams KA. Evaluation of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Society of Nuclear Cardiology appropriateness criteria for SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Cardiol 2008;15:337-44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gupta A, Tsiaras SV, Dunsiger SI, Tilkemeier PL. Gender disparity and the appropriateness of myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Cardiol 2011;18:588-94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Carryer DJ, Hodge DO, Miller TD, Askew JW, Gibbons RJ. Application of appropriateness criteria to stress single photon emission computed tomography sestamibi studies: A comparison of the 2009 revised appropriateness criteria to the 2005 original criteria. Am Heart J 2010;160:244-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hendel RC, Cerqueira M, Douglas PS, Caruth KC, Allen JM, Jensen NC, et al. A Multicenter assessment of the use of single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging with appropriateness criteria. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:156-62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Koh AS, Flores JLS, Keng FYJ, Tan RS, Chua TSJ. Evaluation of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Society of Nuclear Cardiology appropriateness criteria for SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in an Asian tertiary cardiac center. J Nucl Cardiol 2011;18:324-30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gholamrezanezhad A, Shirafkan A, Mirpour S, Rayatnavaz M, Alborzi A, Mogharrabi M, et al. Appropriateness of referrals for single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT-MPI) in a developing community: a comparison between 2005 and 2009 versions of ACCF/ASNC appropriateness criteria. J Nucl Cardiol 2011;18:1044-52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hesse B, Tägil K, Cuocolo A, Anagnostopoulos C, Bardiés M, Bax J, et al. EANM/ESC procedural guidelines for myocardial perfusion imaging in nuclear cardiology. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2005;32:855-97.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Gibbons RJ, Abrams J, Chatterjee K, Daley J, Deedwania PC, Douglas JS, et al. ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with chronic stable angina—summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee on the Management of Patients With Chronic Stable Angina). J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41:159-68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fleisher LA, Beckman JA, Brown KA, Calkins H, Chaikof E, Fleischmann KE, et al. ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and care for noncardiac surgery: executive summary: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery). Circulation 2007;116:1971-96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Grundy SM, Pasternak R, Greenland P, Smith S Jr, Fuster V. Assessment of cardiovascular risk by use of multiple-risk-factor assessment equations: A statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology. Circulation 1999;100:1481-92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Conroy RM, Pyorala K, Fitzgerald AP, Sans S, Menotti A, De Backer G, et al. for the SCORE Project Group. Estimation of ten-year risk of fatal cardiovascular disease in Europe: the SCORE Project. Eur Heart J 2003;24:987-1003.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Mainous AG III, Koopman RJ, Diaz VA, Everett CJ, Wilson PWF, Tilley BC. A coronary heart disease risk score based on patient-reported information. Am J Cardiol 2007;99:1236-41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. European Commission, Eurostat. Regional GDP per capita in 2009: seven capital regions in the ten first places http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_PUBLIC/1-13032012-AP/EN/1-13032012-AP-EN.PDF. Accessed 22 July 2012.

  26. Georgoulias P, Valotassiou V, Tsougos I, Demakopoulos N. Myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention. Curr Cardiol Rev 2010;6:98-103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Klocke FJ, Baird MG, Bateman TM, Berman DS, Carabello BA, Cerqueira MD, et al. ACC/AHA/ASNC guidelines for the clinical use of cardiac radionuclide imaging: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASNC Committee to Revise the 1995 Guidelines for the Clinical Use of Radionuclide Imaging). (2003). American College of Cardiology Web Site. http://www.acc.org/clinical/guidelines/radio/rni_fulltext.pdf.

  28. Shah BR, Cowper PA, O’Brien SM, Jensen N, Drawz M, Patel MR, et al. Patterns of cardiac stress testing after revascularization in community practice. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;56:1328-34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Shaw LJ, Mieres JH, Hendel RH, Boden WE, Gulati M, Veledar E, et al. Comparative effectiveness of exercise electrocardiography with or without myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography in women with suspected coronary artery disease. Results from the What is the Optimal Method for Ischemia Evaluation in Women (WOMEN) Trial. Circulation 2011;124:1239-49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Shaw LJ, Bairey Merz CN, Pepine CJ, Reis SE, Bittner V, Kelsey SF, et al. Insights From the NHLBI-Sponsored Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) Study. Part I: Gender differences in traditional and novel risk factors, symptom evaluation, and gender-optimized diagnostic strategies. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:4S-20S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Poornima IG, Miller TD, Christian TF, Hodge DO, Bailey KR, Gibbons RJ. Utility of myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with low-risk treadmill scores. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43:194-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Bax JJ, Young LH, Frye RL, Bonow RO, Steinberg HO. ADA. Screening for coronary artery disease in patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care 2007;30:2729-36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Efstratios Moralidis PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moralidis, E., Papadimitriou, N., Stathaki, M. et al. A multicenter evaluation of the appropriate use of single-photon emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging in Greece. J. Nucl. Cardiol. 20, 275–283 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-012-9664-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-012-9664-0

Keywords

Navigation