Skip to main content
Log in

Reconsidering Darwin’s “Several Powers”

  • Published:
Biosemiotics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Contemporary textbooks often define evolution in terms of the replication, mutation, and selective retention of DNA sequences, ignoring the contribution of the physical processes involved. In the closing line of The Origin of Species, however, Darwin recognized that natural selection depends on prior more basic living functions, which he merely described as life’s “several powers.” For Darwin these involved the organism’s capacity to maintain itself and to reproduce offspring that preserve its critical functional organization. In modern terms we have come to recognize that this involves the continual generation of complex organic molecules in complex configurations accomplished with the aid of persistent far-from-equilibrium chemical self-organizing and self-assembling processes. But reliable persistence and replication of these processes also requires constantly available constraints and boundary conditions. Organism autonomy further requires that these constraints and co-dependent dynamics are reciprocally produced, each by the other. In this paper I argue that the different constraint-amplifying dynamics of two or more self-organizing processes can be coupled so that they reciprocally generate each other’s critical supportive boundary conditions. This coupling is a higher-order constraint (which can be distributed among components or offloaded onto molecular structures) that effectively constitutes a sign vehicle “interpreted” by the synergistic dynamics of these co-dependent self-organizing process so that they reconstitute this same semiotic-dynamic relationship and its self-reconstituting potential in new substrates. This dynamical co-dependence constitutes Darwin’s “several powers” and is the basis of the biosemiosis that enables evolution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Darwin, C. (1971 [1859]). On the origin of species by means of natural selection or the preservation of favored races in the struggle for life. London: J. M. Dent & Sons.

  • Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deacon, T. (2006). Reciprocal linkage between self-organizing processes is sufficient for self-reproduction and evolvability. Biological Theory, 1(2), 136–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deacon, T. (2012). Incomplete nature: How mind emerged from matter. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. (1996). Darwin’s dangerous idea: Evolution and the meanings of life. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonas, H. (2001). The phenomenon of life. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juarrero, A. (1999). Dynamics in action: Intentional behavior as a complex system. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1790, 1951). Critique of judgement. (trans: Bernard, J. H.). New York: Hafner Press.

  • Langton, C. (1988). Artificial life: Proceedings of an interdisciplinary workshop on the synthesis and simulation of living systems. (Editor). New York: Addison-Wesley.

  • Maturana, H., & Varela, F. (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. Boston: Riedel.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. (1961). Cause and effect in biology. Science, 134, 1501–1506.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pittendrigh, C. (1958). Adaptation, natural selection, and behavior. In A. Roe & G. G. Simpson (Eds.), Behavior and evolution. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrödinger, E. (1944). What is life? The physical aspect of the living cell. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varela, F. (1979). Principles of biological autonomy. New York: Elsevier North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Neumann, J., & Burks, A. W. (1966). Theory of self-reproducing automata. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, A. (2016). The biology of wonder: Aliveness, feeling, and the metamorphosis of science. Gabriola Island: New Society Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Terrence W. Deacon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Deacon, T.W. Reconsidering Darwin’s “Several Powers”. Biosemiotics 9, 121–128 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-016-9263-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-016-9263-6

Keywords

Navigation