Abstract
Contemporary textbooks often define evolution in terms of the replication, mutation, and selective retention of DNA sequences, ignoring the contribution of the physical processes involved. In the closing line of The Origin of Species, however, Darwin recognized that natural selection depends on prior more basic living functions, which he merely described as life’s “several powers.” For Darwin these involved the organism’s capacity to maintain itself and to reproduce offspring that preserve its critical functional organization. In modern terms we have come to recognize that this involves the continual generation of complex organic molecules in complex configurations accomplished with the aid of persistent far-from-equilibrium chemical self-organizing and self-assembling processes. But reliable persistence and replication of these processes also requires constantly available constraints and boundary conditions. Organism autonomy further requires that these constraints and co-dependent dynamics are reciprocally produced, each by the other. In this paper I argue that the different constraint-amplifying dynamics of two or more self-organizing processes can be coupled so that they reciprocally generate each other’s critical supportive boundary conditions. This coupling is a higher-order constraint (which can be distributed among components or offloaded onto molecular structures) that effectively constitutes a sign vehicle “interpreted” by the synergistic dynamics of these co-dependent self-organizing process so that they reconstitute this same semiotic-dynamic relationship and its self-reconstituting potential in new substrates. This dynamical co-dependence constitutes Darwin’s “several powers” and is the basis of the biosemiosis that enables evolution.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Darwin, C. (1971 [1859]). On the origin of species by means of natural selection or the preservation of favored races in the struggle for life. London: J. M. Dent & Sons.
Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. New York: Oxford University Press.
Deacon, T. (2006). Reciprocal linkage between self-organizing processes is sufficient for self-reproduction and evolvability. Biological Theory, 1(2), 136–149.
Deacon, T. (2012). Incomplete nature: How mind emerged from matter. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.
Dennett, D. (1996). Darwin’s dangerous idea: Evolution and the meanings of life. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Jonas, H. (2001). The phenomenon of life. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Juarrero, A. (1999). Dynamics in action: Intentional behavior as a complex system. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Kant, I. (1790, 1951). Critique of judgement. (trans: Bernard, J. H.). New York: Hafner Press.
Langton, C. (1988). Artificial life: Proceedings of an interdisciplinary workshop on the synthesis and simulation of living systems. (Editor). New York: Addison-Wesley.
Maturana, H., & Varela, F. (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. Boston: Riedel.
Mayr, E. (1961). Cause and effect in biology. Science, 134, 1501–1506.
Pittendrigh, C. (1958). Adaptation, natural selection, and behavior. In A. Roe & G. G. Simpson (Eds.), Behavior and evolution. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Schrödinger, E. (1944). What is life? The physical aspect of the living cell. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Varela, F. (1979). Principles of biological autonomy. New York: Elsevier North Holland.
von Neumann, J., & Burks, A. W. (1966). Theory of self-reproducing automata. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.
Weber, A. (2016). The biology of wonder: Aliveness, feeling, and the metamorphosis of science. Gabriola Island: New Society Publishers.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Deacon, T.W. Reconsidering Darwin’s “Several Powers”. Biosemiotics 9, 121–128 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-016-9263-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-016-9263-6