Abstract
The question: are humans the only animals endowed with language? must be preceded by the question: what makes language a unique communication system? The American linguist Charles F. Hockett answers the second question by listing what he considers the criteria that differentiate language from other communication systems. His ‘design-feature’ approach, first presented in 1958, has become a popular tool by which the communication systems of non-human animals are guaranteed a priori exclusion from the notion of language. However, the results of interspecific communication research and the discovery of language–like qualities in the natural communication systems of non-human animals (as opposed to the artificial systems devised to further language research) demonstrate that language capabilities have evolved in parallel in many species. Thus Hockett’s approach is thoroughly undermined, and in need of revision. The more fundamental question that must be faced by the design-feature approach is: are its features essential for language as a distinct and vivid phenomenon, or merely applied to language as an object of linguistic investigation? This paper offers a detailed overview of Hockett’s design-features and emphasizes the problematic nature of certain characteristics. Following Slobodchikoff and Segerdahl et al., the paper shows that language cannot be defined as an exclusive quality of a single species.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
However, the very first public mention of those seven design-features emerged the previous year, in his ’A Course in Modern Linguistic.’
“The meaningful elements in any language – ‘words’ in everyday parlance, ‘morphemes’ to the linguist – constitute an enormous stock.” (Hockett 1982:6) Nevertheless, words and morphemes are not synonymous. For example, the word animals has two morphemes animal (base morpheme = morpheme giving a meaning to the word) and s (suffix = a morpheme that comes after a base morpheme).
DF 1 = Design-Feature 1; and so forth.
Abstract symbols representing words
LRC—Language Research Center – (Segerdahl et al. 2005).
References
Abe, K., & Watanabe, D. (2011). Songbirds possess the spontaneous ability to discriminate syntactic rules. Nature Neuroscience. doi:10.1038/nn.2869.
Allen, C., & Bekoff, M. (1997). Species of mind: The philosophy and biology of cognitive ethology. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Altmann, S. A. (1967). The structure of primate social communication. In S. A. Altmann (Ed.), Social communication among primates (pp. 325–362). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Bekoff, M. (2013). We are animals and therein lies hope for a better future. Blog post. Psychology Today. http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/animal–emotions/201312/we–are–animals–and–therein–lies–hope–better–future. Accessed 25 Jul 2014.
Bickerton, D. (2000). Resolving discontinuity: a minimalist distinction between human and non-human minds. Animal Zoologist, 40(6), 862–873.
Buchler, J. (Ed.). (1955). Philosophical writings of Peirce. New York: Dover Publications.
Burling, R. (1993). Primate calls, human language, and nonverbal communication. Current Anthropology, (34)1, 25–53.
Cheney, D. L., & Seyfarth, R. M. (1990). How monkeys see the world: Inside the mind of another species. Chicago: The University Chicago Press.
Crist, E. (2004). Can an insect speak? The case of the honeybee dance language. Social Studies of Science, (34)1, 7–43.
Deacon, W. T. (1997). The symbolic species: The co-evolution of language and the brain. New York: Norton.
Derrida, J. (1991). “Eating well, “or the calculation of the subject: An Interview with Jacques Derrida. In E. Cadava, P. Connor, & J. L. Nancy (Eds.), Who comes after the subject? (pp. 96–111). New York: Routledge.
Fouts, R. (2004). Apes, Darwinian continuity and the law. Animal Law, 10, 99–124.
Garland, E. C., Gedamke, J., Rekdahl, M. L., Noad, M. J., Garrigue, C., & Gales, N. (2013). Humpback whale song on the southern ocean feeding grounds: implications for cultural transmission. PLoS ONE. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0079422.
Gentner, T. Q., Fenn, K. M., Margoliash, D., & Nusbaum, H. C. (2006). Recursive syntactic pattern learning by songbirds. Nature. doi:10.1038/nature04675.
Gould, J. L. (1976). The dance-language controversy. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 51(2), 211–244.
Griffin, D. R. [1976] (1981). The question of animal awareness: Evolutionary continuity of mental experience. New York: The Rockefeller University Press.
Hailman, J. P., & Ficken, M. S. (1986). Combinatorial animal communication with computable syntax: chick-a-dee calling qualifies as ‘language’ by structural linguistics. Animal Behaviour, 34(6), 1899–1901.
Hauser, M. D. (1988). How infant vervet monkeys learn to recognize starling alarm calls: the role of experience. Behaviour, 105(3/4), 187–201.
Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N., & Fitch, W. T. (2002). The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science, 298, 1569–1579.
Hockett, C. F. (1959). Animal ‘languages’ and human language. In J. N. Spuhler (Ed.), The evolution of man’s capacity for culture (pp. 32–39). Detroit: Wayne State University Press.
Hockett, C. F. (1963). The problems of universals in language. In J. H. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals in language (pp. 1–29). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Hockett, C. F. (1977) [1960b]. Logical considerations in the study of animal communication. In C. F Hockett, The view from language: Selected essays 1948–1974 (pp. 124–162). Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
Hockett, C. F. (1982) [1960a]. The origin of speech. In W. S-Y.Wang (Ed.), Human communication: Language and its psychobiological bases (pp. 4–12). San Francisco: Freeman.
Hurford, J. R. (2004). Human uniqueness, learned symbols and recursive thought. European Review, 12(4), 551–565.
Kleisner, K. (2008). The semantic morphology of Adolf Portmann: a starting point for the biosemiotics of organic form? Biosemiotics, 1(2), 207–219.
Kleisner, K. (2011). Perceive, co-opt, modify, and live! Organism as a centre of experience. Biosemiotics, 4(2), 223–241.
Kleisner, K., & Maran, T. (2014). Visual communication in animals: Applying Portmannian and Uexküllian biosemiotic approach. In D. Machin (Ed.), Visual communication (pp. 659–676). Berlin: De Gruyter.
Kroodsma, D. (2004). The diversity and plasticity of birdsong. In P. Marler & H. Slabbekoorn (Eds.), Nature’s music: The science of birdsong (pp. 108–131). San Diego: Elsevier academic press.
Kull, K. (2010). Ecosystems are made of semiosic bonds: consortia, umwelten, biophony and ecological codes. Biosemiotics, 3(3), 347–357.
Lenneberg, E. H. (1967). Biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley.
Lowenthal, F., & Lefebvre, L. (Eds.). (2014). Language and recursion. New York: Springer.
Mangum, W. A. (2010). The “Language”of honey bees. In S. J. Behrens & J. A. Parker (Eds.), Language in the real world: An introduction to linguistic (pp. 255–273). New York: Routledge.
Manser, M. B., Seyfarth, R. M., & Cheney, D. L. (2002). Suricate alarm calls signal predator class and urgency. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(2), 55–57.
Maran, T., & Kleisner, K. (2010). Towards an evolutionary biosemiotics: semiotic selection and semiotic co-option. Biosemiotics, 3(2), 189–200.
Martinelli, D. (2010). A critical companion to zoosemiotics: people, paths, ideas. Dordrecht: Springer.
Mayberry, R. I. (2002). Cognitive development in deaf children: The interface of language and perception in neuropsychology. In S. J. Segalowitz & I. Rapin (Eds.), Handbook of Neuropsychology (Vol. 8, Part II., pp. 71–107). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
Nöth, W. (1990). Handbook of semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Nöth, W. (2013). The life of symbols and other legisigns: More than a mere metaphor? In V. Romanini & E. Fernandáz (Eds.), Peirce and Biosemiotics: A guess at the riddle of life (pp. 171–183). Heidelberg: Springer.
Outtara, K., Lemasson, A., & Zuberbühler, K. (2009). Campbell’s monkeys use affixation to alter call meaning. PLoS ONE. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0007808.
Patterson, F., & Linden, E. (1981). The education of Koko. New York: Rinehart and Winston.
Peirce, Ch. S. (1998a) [1902]. The ethics of terminology. In Peirce edition project (Ed.), The essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings (Vol. 2, 1893–1913, pp. 263–267). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Peirce, Ch. S. (1998b) [1903]. Nomenclature and divisions of triadic relations, as far as they are determined. In Peirce edition project (Ed.), The essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings (Vol. 2, 1893–1913, pp. 289–299). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Pepperberg, I. M. (1999). The Alex Studies: Cognitive and communicative abilities of grey parrots. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Pinker, S., & Jackendoff, R. (2005). The faculty of language: what’s special about it? Cognition, 95, 201–236.
Premack, D. (2004). Is language the key to human intelligence? Science. doi:10.1126/science.1093993.
Rendell, L., & Whitehead, H. (2001). Culture in whales and dolphins. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 309–382.
Salthe, S. N. (2014). Creating the umwelt: from chance to choice. Biosemiotics. doi:10.1007/s12304-014-9204-1.
Sandler, W., Aronoff, M., Meir, I., & Padden, C. (2011). The gradual emergence of phonological form in a new language. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 29(2), 503–543.
Savage-Rumbaugh, S. (2004). The gentle genius of bonobos. Online video clip. TED. <http://www.ted.com/talks/susan_savage_rumbaugh_on_apes_that_write.html>. Accessed on 25 Nov 2013.
Sebeok, T. A. (1972). Perspectives in zoosemiotics. The Hague: Mouton.
Sebeok, T. A. (Ed.). (1977). How animals communicate. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Sebeok, T. A. (1990). Essays in zoosemiotics. Toronto: Toronto Semiotic Circle.
Segerdahl, P., Fields, W., & Savage-Rumbaugh, S. (2005). Kanzi’s primal language: The cultural initiation of primates into language. Hampshire: Palgrave MacMillan.
Seyfarth, R. M., & Cheney, D. L. (1993). Meaning, reference and intentionality in the natural vocalizations of monkeys. In H. L. Roitblat, L. M. Herman, & P. E. Nachtigall (Eds.), Language and communication: Comparative perspectives. Hillsday: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Seyfarth, R. M., Cheney, D. L., & Marler, P. (1980). Monkey responses to three different alarm calls: evidence of predator classification and semantic communication. Science, 210(4471), 801–803.
Slobodchikoff, C. (2012). Chasing Doctor Dolittle: Learning the language of animals. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Slobodchikoff, C., Perla, B. S., & Verdolin, J. (2009). Prairie Dogs: Communication and community in an animal society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Stella, M., & Kleisner, K. (2010). Uexküllian umwelt as science and as ideology: the light and the dark side of a concept. Theory in Biosciences, 129(1), 39–51.
Stephan, C., & Zuberbühler, K. (2014). Predation affects alarm call usage in female Diana monkeys (Cercopithecus diana diana). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 68(2), 321–331.
Stokoe, W. C. (1960). Sign language structure: An outline of the visual communication systems of the American deaf. New York: University of Buffalo.
Suzuki, T. N. (2014). Communication about predator type by a bird using discrete, graded and combinatorial variation in alarm calls. Animal Behaviour. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.10.009.
Tallerman, M., & Gibson, K. R. (Eds.). (2012). The Oxford handbook of language evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.
Thibault, P. J. (2011). First-order languaging dynamics and second-order language: the distributed language view. Ecological Psychology, 23(3), 1–36.
Thorpe, W. H. (1972). The Comparison of vocal communication in animals and man. In R. A. Hinde (Ed.), Non-verbal communication (pp. 27–47). Cambridge: University Press.
Tønnessen, M. (2009). Umwelt transitions: uexküll and environmental change. Biosemiotics, 2(1), 47–64.
van der Hulst, H. (Ed.). (2010). Recursion and human language. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
von Uexküll, J. (1957) [1934]. A Stroll through the worlds of animals and men. In C. Schiller (Ed.), Instinctive behavior (pp. 5–80). New York: International Universities Press.
Webb, D. M., & Zhang, J. (2005). FoxP2 in song-learning birds and vocal-learning mammals. Journal of Heredity, 96(3), 212–216.
Zuberbühler, K. (2009). Survivor signals: The biology and psychology of animal alarm calling. In M. Naguib, V. Janik, N. Clayton, & K. Zuberbühler (Eds.), Advances in the study of behavior (pp. 277–322). London: Academic.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Čadková, L. Do They Speak Language?. Biosemiotics 8, 9–27 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-014-9225-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-014-9225-9