Skip to main content
Log in

The Egg as a Semiotic Gateway to Reproduction

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biosemiotics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The egg behaves as a prospective cell sustaining the developmental processes of the future embryo. In biosemiotic terms, this apparent teleonomic behaviour can be accounted for without referring to the exclusive causal role played by its genetic makeup. We envision two different processes that are uniquely found in the oocyte: (1) the first involves the mechanisms by which large amounts of mRNA accumulate in the ooplasm to establish the embryo axes prior to fertilization; (2) the second involves transfer of an excess of maternally supplied ribosomes to the oocyte to provide the future embryo with newly synthesized proteins. In this paper, we argue that the information required to sustain embryonic development is not due to any physical properties of the zygotic DNA and the maternal mRNAs, but to their spatially and temporally ordered relationship in the zygote’s internal space.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alberts, B., Johnson, A., Lewis, J., Raff, M., Roberts, K., & Walter, P. (2002). Molecular biology of the cell (4th ed.). New York: Garland Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becalska, A. N., & Gavis, E. R. (2009). Lighting up mRNA localization in Drosophila oogenesis. Development, 136, 2493–2503.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bruni, L. E. (2011). The multitrophic plant-herbivore-parasitoid-pathogen system: A biosemiotic perspective. In K. Kull & C. Emmeche (Eds.), Towards a semiotic biology: Life is the action of signs (pp. 143–166). London: Imperial College Press.

  • Cariani, P. (1998). Towards an evolutionary semiotics: The emergence of new sign-functions in organisms and devices. In G. Van de Vijver, S. Salthe, & M. Delpos (Eds.), Evolutionary systems (pp. 359–377). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cha, B. J., Koppetsch, B. S., & Theurkauf, W. E. (2001). In vivo analysis of Drosophila bicoid mRNA localization reveals a novel microtubule-dependent axis specification pathway. Cell, 106, 35–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Driever, W., Siegel, V., & Nosslein-Volhard, C. (1990). Autonomous determination of anterior structures in the early Drosophila embryo by the bicoid morphogen. Development, 109, 811–820.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Favareau, D. (2010). Essential readings in biosemiotics. Anthology and commentary. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández, E. (2010). Taking the relational turn: biosemiotics and some new trends in biology. Biosemiotics, 3, 147–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmeyer, J. (2001). Life and reference. Biosystems, 60, 123–130.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmeyer, J. (2008). Semiotic scaffolding of living systems. In M. Barbieri (Ed.), Introduction to biosemiotics (pp. 149–166). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmeyer, J. (2012). The semiome: From genetic to semiotic scaffolding. Semiotica (in print) [Maran, Timo (Ed.), Special issue on zoosemiotics].

  • Hoffmeyer, J., & Emmeche, C. (1991). Code-duality and the semiotics of nature. In M. Anderson & F. Merrell (Eds.), On semiotic modeling (pp. 117–166). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmeyer, J., & Emmeche, C. (2005). Code-duality and the semiotics of nature. Journal of Biosemiotics, 1, 27–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joslyn, C. (2001). The semiotics of control and modeling relations in complex systems. Biosystems, 60, 131–148.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mothes, W., Jungnickel, B., Brunner, J., & Rapoport, T. A. (1998). Signal sequence recognition in cotranslational translocation by protein components of the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. The Journal of Cell Biology, 142, 355–364.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura, A., Amikura, R., Hanyu, K., & Kobayashi, S. (2001). Me31B silences translation of oocyte-localizing RNAs through the formation of cytoplasmic RNP complex during Drosophila oogenesis. Development, 128, 3233–3242.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, S. A., & Müller, G. B. (2000). Epigenetic mechanisms of character origination. Journal of Experimental Zoology, 288, 304–317.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Niki, Y., & Mahowald, A. P. (2003). Ovarian cystocytes can repopulate the embryonic germ line and produce functional gametes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100, 14042–14045.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pattee, H. H. (2001a). The physics of symbols: bridging the epistemic cut. Biosystems, 60, 5–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pattee, H. H. (2001b). Irreducible and complementary semiotic forms. Semiotica, 134, 341–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, S. (2003). The origin of dorsoventral polarity in Drosophila. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London B., 358, 1317–1329.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, S., & Lynch, J. A. (2009). Symmetry breaking during Drosophila oogenesis. Cold Spring Harbor Perspective in Biology, 1, a001891.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C., & Lehmann, R. (1991). Nanos is the localized posterior determinant in Drosophila. Cell, 66, 637–647.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilsch-Bräuninger, M., Schwarz, H., & Nüsslein-Volhard, C. (1997). A sponge-like structure involved in the association and transport of maternal products during Drosophila oogenesis. Journal of Cell Biology, 139, 817–829.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Franco Giorgi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Giorgi, F., Bruni, L.E. & Goldberg, L.J. The Egg as a Semiotic Gateway to Reproduction. Biosemiotics 6, 489–496 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-013-9181-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-013-9181-9

Keywords

Navigation