Abstract
Describing resources and their relationships with organisms seems to be a useful approach to a ‘unified ecology’, contributing to fill the gap between natural and human oriented processes, and opening new perspectives in dealing with biological complexity. This Resource Criterion defines the main properties of resources, describes the mechanisms that link them to individual species, and gives a particular emphasis to the biosemiotic approach that allows resources to be identified inside a heterogeneous ecological medium adopting the eco-field model. In particular, this Criterion allows to couple matter, structured energy and information composing the ecological systems to the biosemiotic and cognitive mechanisms adopted by individual species to track resources, transforming neutral surroundings into meaningful species-specific Umwelten. The expansion of the human semiotic niche that is a relevant evolutionary process of the present time, assigns the role of powerful and efficient agency to the Resources Criterion to evaluate the effect of human intrusion into the natural systems with habits of key stone species, under the challenge of a growing use of alloctonous, immaterial and symbolic resources of the actual globalized societal models. The Resource Criterion interprets the ecological dynamics contributing to complete the epistemology of the ecology, to open a bridge toward economy and other societal sciences, and to contribute to formulate a General Theory of Resources.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen, T. F. H., & Hoekstra, T. W. (1992). Toward a unified ecology. New York: Columbia University Press.
Andersson, J. O., & Lindroth, M. (2001). Ecological unsustainable trade. Ecological Economics, 37(1), 113–122.
Anonymous. (2003). Welcome to the anthropocene. Nature, 424, 709.
Baranger, M. (2001). Chaos, complexity, and entropy: A physics talk for non-physicists, Wesleyan University Physics Dept. Colloquium (2001). Available at http://www.necsi.org/projects/baranger/cce.html.
Barbieri, M. (2003). The organic codes. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Barbieri, M. (2008). What is biosemiotics? Biosemiotics, 1, 1–3.
Barrett, T. L., Farina, A., & Barrett, G. W. (2009). Aesthetic landscapes: an emergent component in sustaining societies. Landscape Ecology. doi:10.1007/s10980-009-9354-8.
Bekoff, M. (2003). Minding animals, minding earth: science, nature, kinship, and hearth. Human Ecology Review, 10(1), 56–76.
Boyce, M. S., & McDonal, L. L. (1999). Relating populations to habitats using resource selection functions. TREE, 14(7), 268–272.
Boyd, J., & Banzhaf, S. (2007). What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units. Ecological Economics, 63, 616–626.
Brown, J. H., Gillooly, J. E., Allen, A. P., Savage, V. M., & West, G. B. (2004). Toward a metabolic theory of ecology. Ecology, 85, 1771–1789.
Burchell, R. W., Downs, A., McCann, B., & Mukherji, S. (2005). Sprawl costs. Washington: Island.
Cadenasso, M. L., Pickett, S. T. A., & Grove, J. M. (2006). Dimensions of ecosystem complexity: heterogeneity, connectivity, and history. Ecological Complexity, 3, 1–12.
Carpenter, S. R., & Folke, C. (2006). Ecology for transformation. TRENDS, 21(6), 309–315.
Clements, F. E., & Shelford, V. E. (1939). Bio-ecology. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Cottinghamm, K. L., & Zens, M. S. (2004). Metabolic rate opens a grand vista on ecology. Ecology, 85(7), 1805–1807.
Cristancho, S., & Vining, J. (2004). Culturally-defined keystone species. Review in Human Ecology, 11, 153–164.
Crutzen, P. J. (2002). Geology of mankind. Nature, 415, 23.
Dietz, T., Rosa, E. A., & York, R. (2009). Environmental efficient well-being: rethinking sustainability as the relationship between human well-being and environmental impacts. Human Ecology Review, 16, 114–123.
Dwernychuk, L. W., & Boag, D. A. (1972). Ducks nesting in association with gulls—an ecological trap? Canadian Journal of Zoology, 50, 559–563.
Eder, J., & Rembold, H. (1992). Biosemiotics—a paradigm of biology. Naturwissenschaften, 79, 60–67.
Edwards, P. J., & Abivardi, C. (1998). The value of biodiversity: where ecology and economy blend. Biological Conservation, 83, 239–246.
Eisler, A. D., Eisler, H., & Yoshida, M. (2003). Perception of human ecology: cross-cultural and gender comparisons. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 89–101.
Farina, A. (2008). The landscape as a semiotic interface between organisms and resources. Biosemiotics, 1(1), 75–83.
Farina, A., & Belgrano, A. (2004). The eco-field: a new paradigm for landscape ecology. Ecological Research, 19, 107–110.
Farina, A., & Belgrano, A. (2006). The eco-field hypothesis: toward a cognitive landscape. Landscape Ecology, 21, 5–17.
Farina, A., Johnson, A. R., Turber, S. J., & Belgrano, A. (2003). ‘Full’ world versus ‘empty’ world paradigm at the time of globalisation. Ecological Economics, 45, 11–18.
Farina, A., Bogaert, J., & Schipani, I. (2005). Cognitive landscape and information: new perspectives to investigate the ecological complexity. BioSystems, 79, 235–240.
Farina, A., Scozzafava, S., & Napoletano, B. (2007). Paesaggi Terapeutici: basi paradigmatiche e contributo delle diverse discipline/Therapeutic Landscapes. Paradigms and Applications. In: A. Ghersi (Ed.), Paesaggi terapeutici/Therapeutic landscapes. Alinea Editrice.
Favareau, D. (2007). The evolutionary history of biosemiotics. In M. Barbieri (Ed.), Introduction to biosemiotics: The new biological synthesis (pp. 1–65). Berlin: Springer.
Fisher, B., Turner, R. K., & Morling, P. (2009). Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecological Economics, 68, 643–653.
Gomez-Baggethun, de Groot, R., Lomas, P. L., & Montes, C. (2010). The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: from early notions to markets and payment schemes. Ecological Economics, 69, 1209–1218.
Harris-Jones, P. (2009). Honeybees, communicative order, and the collapse of ecosystems. Biosemiotics. doi:10.1007/S1230-009-9044-6.
Harte, J. (2004). The value of null theories in ecology. Ecology, 85(7), 1792–1794.
Hoffmayer, J. (2008). Biosemiotics. An examination into the signs of life and the life of signs. Scranton: Scranton University Press.
Holt, R. D. (2008). Theoretical perspective on resource pulse. Ecology, 89(3), 671–681.
Hutchinson, G. E. (1957). Concluding remarks. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, 22(2), 415–427.
Ingold, T. (2000). The perception of the environment. Essays in livelihood, dwelling and skill. New York: Routledge.
Kauffman, S. (1993). The origins of order. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kull, K. (2010). Ecosystems are made by semiosic bonds: consortia, umwelten, biophony and ecological codes. Biosemiotics, 3, 347–357.
Laland, K. N., & Brown, G. R. (2006). Niche construction, human behavior, and the adaptive-lag hypothesis. Evolutionary Anthropology, 15, 95–104.
Levin, S. (1999). Fragile dominion. Complexity and the commons. Reading: Helix Books, Perseus Books.
Lubchenco, J. (1998). Entering the century of the environment: a new social contract for science. Science, 279, 491–497.
Lubchenco, J., Olson, A. M., Brudbaker, L. B., Carpenter, S. R., Holland, M. M., Hubbell, S. P., et al. (1991). The sustainable biosphere initiative: an ecological research agenda. Ecology, 72, 371–412.
Magnuson, J. J., Crowder, L. B., & Medvick, P. A. (1979). Temperature as an ecological resource. American Zoologist, 19, 331–343.
Maturana, H. R., & Varela, J. F. (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition. The realization of the living. Dordrecht: Rediel Publishing Company.
McIntyre, N. E., Wiens, J. A. (1999). Interactions between landscape structure and animal behavior: the role of heterogeneously distributed resources and food deprivation on movement patterns. Landscape Ecology, 14, 437–447.
MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment). (2005a). Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Washington: Island.
MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment). (2005b). Ecosystems and human well-being: Biodiversity synthesis. Washington: Island.
Mooney, H., et al. (2009). Biodiversity, climate change, and ecosystem services. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 1, 46–54.
Müller, F. (1997). State-of-the-art in ecosystem theory. Ecological Modelling, 100, 135–161.
Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., de Fonseca, G. A. B., & Kent, J. (2000). Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature, 403, 853–858.
Naveh, Z. (2000). What is holistic landscape ecology? A conceptual introduction. Landscape and Urban Planning, 50, 7–26.
Nielsen, S. N. (2007). Towards an ecosystem semiotics. Some basic aspects for a new research programme. Ecological Complexity, 4, 93–101.
Odling-Smee, F. J., Laland, K. N., & Feldman, M. W. (2003). Niche construction. The neglected process in evolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Padiala, J. M., Avila, E., & Sancheza, J. M. (2002). Feeding habits and overlap among red fox (Vulpes vulpes) and stone marten (Martes foina) in two Mediterranean mountain habitats. Zeitschrift für Saugetierkunde, 67, 137–146.
Patalano, M., & Lovari, S. (1993). Food habits and trophic niche overlap of the wolf Canis lupus (Linnaeus, 1758) and the red fox Vulpes vulpes (Linnaeus, 1758) in Mediterranean mountain area. Revue d’ Ecology. Terre Vie, 48, 279–294.
Pearce, D., & Moran, D. (1994). The economic value of biodiversity. Earthscan Publications Limited, London: IUCN.
Pulliam, H. R. (1988). Source-sinks, and population regulation. American Naturalist, 132, 652–661.
Pulliam, H. R. (1996). Sources and sinks: Empirical evidence and population conservation. In O. E. Rhodes, R. K. Chesser, & M. H. Smith (Eds.), Population dynamics in ecological space and time (pp. 45–69). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Ractliffe, J. M., & Nydam, M. L. (2008). Multimodal warning signals of a multiple predator world. Nature, 455, 96–99.
Real, L. (1993). Toward a cognitive ecology. TREE, 8, 413–417.
Rich, C., & Longcore, T. (Eds.). (2006). Ecological consequences of artificial night lighting. Washington: Island.
Rockström, J., et al. (2009). A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461, 472–475.
Saunders, C. D. (2003). The emerging field of conservation psychology. Human Ecology Review, 10, 137–149.
Scheiner, S. M., & Willig, M. R. (2005). Developing unified theories as exemplified with diversity gradient. The American Naturalist, 166(4), 458–469.
Scheiner, S. M., & Willig, M. R. (2007). A general theory of ecology. Theoretical Ecology. doi:10.007/S12080-007-0002.0.
Scheiner, S. M., Hudson, A. J., & VanderMeulen, M. A. (1993). An epistemology for ecology. Bulletin Ecological Society of America, 74(1), 17–21.
Schwinning, S., & Sala, O. E. (2004). Hierarchy of responses to resource pulses in arid and semi-arid ecosystems. Oecologia, 141, 211–220.
Sodhi, N. S., & Ehrlich, P. R. (2010). Conservation biology for all. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stephens, D. W., & Krebs, J. R. (1986). Foraging theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Straton, A. (2005). A complex system approach to the value of ecological resources. Ecological Economics. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.09.017.
Turner, N. J., Davidson-Hunt, I. J., & O’Flaherty, M. (2003). Living on the edge: ecological and cultural edges as sources of diversity for social-ecological resilience. Human Ecology, 31(3), 439–461.
Ulanowicz, R. E. (2009). The dual nature of ecosystem dynamics. Ecological Modelling, 220(16), 1886–1892.
Vining, J., Merrick, M. S., & Price, E. A. (2008). The distinction between human and nature: human perceptions of connectedness to nature and elements of the natural and unnatural. Human Ecology Review, 15, 1–11.
von Barwise, J., & Seligman, J. (1997). Information flow: The logic of distributed systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
von Uexküll, J. (1982). The theory of meaning. Semiotica, 42(1), 25–82.
Williams, J. (2007). Thinking as natural: another look at human exemptionalism. Human Ecology Review, 2, 130–139.
Witzany, G. (2007). Plant communication from biosemiotic perspective. Plant Signalling & Behavior, 1(4), 169–178.
Yang, L. H., Bastow, J. L., Spence, K. O., & Wright, A. N. (2008). What can we learn from resource pulse? Ecology, 89(3), 621–634.
Zalasiewicz, J., et al. (2008). Are we now living in the Anthropocene? GSA Today, 18(2), 4–8. doi:10.1130/GSAT01802A.1.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Farina, A. A Biosemiotic Perspective of the Resource Criterion: Toward a General Theory of Resources. Biosemiotics 5, 17–32 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-011-9119-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-011-9119-z