Abstract
Organic soils represent accumulations of disintegrated plant remains that have been preserved under condition of incomplete aeration and high water content. Using electrokinetic (EK) techniques to improve organic soils entails evaluating factors that define geoenvironmental behavior of organic soils. Electroosmotic properties were investigated to conceptualize EK phenomena. The results of the study showed that the zeta potential, specific surface area, water contents, and liquid limit (LL) increased as the organic content increased. The natural zeta potential of the organic soils varied from −11.2 to −20.8 mV according to the organic content, degree of humification, and soil pH. The negative charge in organic soils is highly pH dependent and surface charge is dropped to zero at pH 2.3 to 3.5. The greater degree of humification resulted in the higher zeta potential and lower pH at the iso-electric point. This paper also gives some insights on ionic modification, which is an innovative method that could be employed to change the water holding capacity of organic soils and its consistency. The Fe+3 ions had 20 to 30% pronounced effect on decreasing LL according to the organic content. Increasing the cation valence reduces the affinity of water to the organic soil surface and decreases LL as a major part of Atterberg’s consistency system. By the sound of peat and its environment, there is a great likelihood that EK techniques could be used to resolve peat’s difficulties from the geoenvironmental viewpoint.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acar, Y.B. and Alshawabkeh, A.N., 1993, Principles of Electrokinetic Remediation. Environmental Science and Technology, 27, 2638–2647.
Alcantara, T., Pazos, M., Cameselle, C., and Sanroman, M. A., 2008, Electrochemical remediation of phenanthrene from contaminated kaolinite. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 30, 89–94.
Arnepalli, D.N., Shanthakumar, S., Rao, B.H. and Singh, D.N., 2008, Comparison of Methods for Determining Specific-surface Area of Fine-grained Soils. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 26, 121–132.
Asavadorndeja, P. and Glawe, U., 2005, Electrokinetic strengthening of soft clay using the anode depolarization method. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 64, 237–245.
ASTM Standard, 1985, ASTM D4187-82: Zeta Potential of Colloids in Water and Waste Water. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania.
Azzam, A. and Oey, W., 2001, The utilization of electrokinetics in geotechnical and environmental engineering. Transport in Porous Media, 42, 293–314.
Beddiar, K., Chong, T.F., Dupas, A., Berthaud, Y., and Dangla, P., 2005, Role of pH in Electro-Osmosis: Experimental Study on NaCl-Water Saturated Kaolinite. Transport in Porous Media, 61, 93–107.
Bowen, W., Jacob, P., and Dupas, A., 1986, Electro-osmosis and the determination of zeta potential: the effect of particle concentration. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 111, 223–229.
British Standard Institution, 1990, Methods of test for soils for civil engineering purposes. BS 1377–1990: Part 1, 2, and 3, London, 133 p.
Chapman, H.D., 1965, Cation exchange capacity. In: Black, C.A. (ed.), Methods of soil analysis — Chemical and microbiological properties. Agronomy, 9, 891–901.
Castillo, A.M., Soriano, J.J., and Delgado, R.A.G., 2008, Changes in chromium distribution during the electrodialytic remediation of a Cr(VI)-contaminated soil. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 30, 153–157.
Duraisamy, Y., Huat, B.K., and Aziz, A.A., 2007, Methods of Utilizing Tropical Peat Land for Housing Scheme. American Journal of Environmental Sciences, 3, 258–263.
Eykholt, G.R. and Daniel, D.E., 1994, Impact of system chemistry on electroosmosis in contaminated soil. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 120, 797–815.
Fang, H.Y. and Daniels, J.L., 2006, Introductory Geotechnical Engineering-An environmental perspective. Taylor and Francis, New York, 545 p.
Ferris, A. and Jepson, W., 1975, The exchange capacities of kaolinite and preparation of homoionic clays. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 51, 245–259.
Fuchsman, C.H., 1986, Peat and Water: aspects of water retention and dewatering in peat. Elsevier Applied Science Publishers Ltd., New York, 95–118.
Gillman, G.P. and Sumpter, E.A., 1986, Modification to compulsive exchange method for measuring exchange characteristics of soils. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 24, 61–66.
Han, S-J., Kim, S-S., and Kim, B-I., 2004, Electroosmosis and pore pressure development characteristics in lead contaminated soil during electrokinetic remediation. Geosciences Journal, 8, 85–93.
Helmholtz, H., 1879, Studien über electrische grenzschichten. Annalen der Physik, 7, 337–382.
Huat, B.K., 2004, Organic and Peat Soils Engineering. University Putra Malaysia Press, Serdang, 146 p.
Huat, B.K., Maail, S., and Mohamed, T.A., 2005, Effect of Chemical Admixtures on the Engineering Properties of Tropical Peat Soils. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 2, 1113–1120.
Hunter, R.J., 1981, Zeta potential in colloid science. Academic Press, London, 386 p.
Kennedy, P. and Geel, P.J.V., 2000, Hydraulics of Peat Filters Treating Septic Tank Effluent. Transport in Porous Media, 41, 47–60.
Kim, S.O., Kim, W.S., and Kim, K.W., 2005, Evaluation of electrokinetic remediation of arsenic-contaminated soils. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 27, 443–453.
Lee, G., Ro, H., Lee, S., and Lee, S., 2006, Electrokinetically enhanced transport of organic and inorganic phosphorus in a low permeability soil. Geosciences Journal, 10, 85–89.
Lee, M.H., Kamon, M., Kim, S.S., Lee, J.Y., and Chung, H.I., 2007, Desorption characteristics of kaolin clay contaminated with zinc from electrokinetic soil processing. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 29, 281–288.
Lorenz, P.B., 1969, Surface Conductance and Electrokinetic Properties of Kaolinite Beds. Clays and Clay Minerals, 17, 223–231.
Madaeni, S.S., Naghdi, S., and Nobili, M.D., 2006, Ultrafiltration of Humic Substances in the Presence of Protein and Metal Ions. Transport in Porous Media, 65, 469–484.
Mitchell, J.K., 1993, Fundamentals of Soil Behavior. 2nd edition, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 437 p.
Park, J-Y., Chen, Y., Chen, J., and Yang, J-W., 2002, Removal of phenanthrene from soil by additive-enhanced electrokinetics. Geosciences Journal, 6, 1–5.
Mohamed, A.M.O. and Anita, H.E., 1998, Developments in Geotechnical Engineering. Geoenvironmental Engineering, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 707 p.
Santamarina, J.C., Klein, K.A., Wang, Y.H., and Prencke, E., 2002, Specific surface area: determination and relevance. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 39, 233–241.
Shi, L., Muller, S., Harms, H., and Wick, L.Y., 2008, Effect of electrokinetic transport on the vulnerability of PAH-degrading bacteria in a model aquifer. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 30, 177–182.
Smoluchowski, von M., 1921, Handbuch der Elektrizitat un der Magnetismus II, 2, 366–428.
Stevenson, F.J., 1994, Humus Chemistry: Genesis, Composition, Reactions. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 496 p.
Vane, M.L. and Zang, G.M., 1997, Effect of aqueous phase properties on clay particle zeta potential and electroosmotic permeability: Implications for electrokinetic remediation processes. Electrochemical Decontamination of Soil and Water, Special Issue of Journal of Hazardous Material, 55, 1–22.
West, L.J. and Stewart, D.I., 1995, Effect of zeta potential on soil electrokinetics. Characterization, containment, remediation, and performance in environmental geotechnics, Geotechnical Special Publication No. 46, ASCE, New York, 2, 1535–1549.
Weng, C.H. and Yuan, C., 2001, Removal of Cr(III) from Clay Soils by Electrokinetics. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 23, 281–285.
Wick, L.Y., Shi, L., and Harms, H., 2007, Electrobioremediation of hydrophobic organic soil contaminants: A review of fundamental interactions. Electrochimica Acta, 52, 3441–3448.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Asadi, A., Huat, B.B.K., Hanafi, M.M. et al. Role of organic matter on electroosmotic properties and ionic modification of organic soils. Geosci J 13, 175–181 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12303-009-0017-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12303-009-0017-1