Skip to main content
Log in

Post-treatment PET–CT Findings may Predict the Prognosis of DLBCL with a Bulky Mass

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Hematology and Blood Transfusion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We retrospectively analyzed the prognosis of patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and a bulky mass at diagnosis. We retrospectively analyzed clinical data for 29 consecutive DLBCL patients with an initial bulky mass receiving R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone) therapy from 2004 to 2011. Bulky disease was defined as a measurable tumor mass >10 cm in diameter or a mediastinal mass >1/3 of the chest diameter. Patients with primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma were excluded. The median age was 65 years (20–78 years) and the maximum tumor diameter was 11.5 cm (10.0–17.0 cm). Complete response and partial response were achieved in 14 patients each, while 1 patient had progressive disease. The 3-year overall survival (OS) rate and progression-free survival (PFS) rate were 66 and 56 %, respectively. Findings on post-treatment positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET–CT) were significantly associated with OS (34 % for patients with abnormal uptake vs. 75 % for those without, P = 0.014), and were also associated with PFS (36 vs. 83 %, respectively, P < 0.001). Nine patients with a single site of abnormal uptake on PET–CT underwent radiotherapy and 5 of them subsequently relapsed. An initial bulky mass does not indicate a poor prognosis of DLBCL. However, the post-treatment PET–CT findings may have predictive value in DLBCL patients with a bulky mass.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shipp MA, Harrington DP, Klatt MM et al (1986) Identification of major prognostic subgroups of patients with large-cell lymphoma treated with m-BACOD or M-BACOD. Ann Intern Med 104:757–765

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hurvich CM, Simonoff JS, Tsai C-L (1998) Smoothing parameter selection in nonparametric regression using an improved Akaike information criterion. J R Stat Soc 60:271–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fisher RI, DeVita VT Jr, Johnson BL et al (1977) Prognostic factors for advanced diffuse histiocytic lymphoma following treatment with combination chemotherapy. Am J Med 63:177–182

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Danieu L, Wong G, Koziner B et al (1986) Predictive model for prognosis in advanced diffuse histiocytic lymphoma. Cancer Res 46:5372–5379

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hoskins PJ, Ng V, Spinelli JJ et al (1991) Prognostic variables in patients with diffuse large-cell lymphoma treated with MACOP-B. J Clin Oncol 9:220–226

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Savage KJ, Al Rajhi N, Voss N et al (2006) Favorable outcome of primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma in a single institution: the British Columbia experience. Ann Oncol 17:123–130

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tomita N, Kodama F, Motomura S et al (2008) Adjuvant radiotherapy to an initial bulky mass in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: lack of survival benefit. Int J Lab Hematol 30:53–57

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Habermann TM, Weller EA, Morrison VA et al (2006) Rituximab-CHOP versus CHOP alone or with maintenance rituximab in older patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 24:3121–3127

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Coiffier B, Lepage E, Briere J et al (2002) CHOP chemotherapy plus rituximab compared with CHOP alone in elderly patients with diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma. New Engl J Med 346:235–242

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pfreundschuh M, Ho AD, Cavallin-Stahl E, Wolf M, Pettengell R, Vasova I, Belch A, Walewski J, Zinzani PL, Mingrone W et al (2008) Prognostic significance of maximum tumour (bulk) diameter in young patients with good-prognosis diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma treated with CHOP-like chemotherapy with or without rituximab: an exploratory analysis of the MabThera International Trial Group (MInT) study. Lancet Oncol 9:435–444

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lister TA, Crowther D, Sutcliffe SB et al (1989) Report of a committee convened to discuss the evaluation and staging of patients with Hodgkin’s disease: cotswolds meeting. J Clin Oncol 7:1630–1636

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Takemura S, Tomita N, Koharazawa H et al (2012) Phase II study of CHOP-GR therapy in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Int J Hematol 96:241–246

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cheson BD, Pfistner B, Juweid ME et al (2007) International harmonization project on lymphoma. Revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 25:579–586

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Song MK, Chung JS, Sung-Yong O et al (2010) Clinical impact of bulky mass in the patient with primary extranodal diffuse large B cell lymphoma treated with R-CHOP therapy. Ann Hematol 10:985–991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fukuhara S, Watanabe T, Munakata W et al (2011) Bulky disease has an impact on outcomes in primary diffuse large B-cell lymphoma of the breast: a retrospective analysis at a single institution. Eur J Hematol 5:434–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Juweid ME, Wiseman GA, Vose JM et al (2005) Response assessment of aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma by integrated international workshop criteria and fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. J Clin Oncol 23:4652–4661

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Meignan M, Barrington S, Itti E et al (2014) Report on the 4th international workshop on positron emission tomography in lymphoma held in Menton, France, 3–5 October 2012. Leuk Lymphoma 55:31–37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hirotaka Takasaki.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Takasaki, H., Yamamoto, W., Ishii, Y. et al. Post-treatment PET–CT Findings may Predict the Prognosis of DLBCL with a Bulky Mass. Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus 31, 346–351 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12288-014-0479-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12288-014-0479-9

Keywords

Navigation