Skip to main content
Log in

Elite wheelchair rugby: a quantitative analysis of chair configuration in Australia

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sports Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Limited recommendations of wheelchair configurations for court sports have been identified in the published literature. To accommodate the wide range of impairments in wheelchair rugby, players are given a point score that reflects their impairment. Players have regularly been grouped as high-, mid-, or low-point players in research, with high-point players having greater levels of muscle function compared with other classifications. This research documented the wheelchair configurations of elite Australian wheelchair rugby players across classification groups. Significant differences (p < 0.05) were found for increased seat height and decreased seat depth for high-point players compared with low- and mid-point groups, respectively. Low-point players displayed reduced wheelchair mass compared with high- and mid-point players, as well as increased frame length. Camber angles showed no significant differences across the classification groups. The incorporation of anthropometric measures, such as the elbow angle at the top dead center, was also investigated. While elbow angle showed no significant differences, seat height-to-total arm length ratio was higher for high-point players. Participants also completed surveys detailing their perception of the effect of altering wheelchair configurations. It is suggested that wheelchair configurations should consider an individual’s anthropometrics, impairment, training history, and court role to promote optimal performance, with predictive modeling having the potential to reduce the associated time and cost.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mason B, van der Woude LH, Goosey-Tolfrey VL (2013) The ergonomics of wheelchair configuration for optimal performance in the wheelchair court sports. Sports Med 43(1):23–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Vanlandewijck YC, Theisen D, Daly DJ (2001) Wheelchair propulsion biomechanics: implications for wheelchair Sports. Sports Med 31(5):339–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Boninger ML, Souza AL, Cooper RA, Fitzgerald SG, Koontz AM, Fay BT (2002) Propulsion patterns and pushrim biomechanics in manual wheelchair propulsion. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 83(5):718–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gorce P, Louis N (2012) Wheelchair propulsion kinematics in beginners and expert users: influence of wheelchair settings. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 27(1):7–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hughes C, Weimar W, Sheth P, Brubaker C (1992) Biomechanics of Wheelchair propulsion as a Function of seat position and user-to-chair interface. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 73:263–269

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kotajarvi B, Sabick M, An K, Zhao K, Kaufman K, Basford R (2004) The effect of seat position on wheelchair propulsion biomechanics. J Rehabil Res Dev 41(3B):403–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tsai CY, Lin CJ, Huang YC, Lin PC, Su FC (2012) The effects of rear-wheel camber on the kinematics of upper extremity during wheelchair propulsion. J Bio Med Eng 11:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  8. van der Woude LH, Bouw A, van Wegen J, van As H, Veeger D, de Groot S (2009) Seat height: effects on submaximal hand rim wheelchair performance during spinal cord injury rehabilitation. J Rehabil Med 41(3):143–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Boninger ML, Baldwin M, Cooper RA, Koontz A, Chan L (2000) Manual wheelchair pushrim biomechanics and axle position. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 81(5):608–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Burton M, Subic A, Mazur M, Leary M (2010) Systematic design customization of sport wheelchairs using the taguchi method. Procedia Eng 2(2):2659–2665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mason B, VDW L, DEG S, Goosey-Tolfrey V (2011) Effects of camber on the ergonomics of propulsion in wheelchair athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc 43(2):319–26

  12. Mason B, Lemstra M, van der Woude LH, Vegter R, Goosey-Tolfrey VL (2015) Influence of wheel configuration on wheelchair basketball performance: wheel stiffness, tyre type and tyre orientation. Med Eng Phys 37(4):392–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Usma-Alvarez CC, Fuss FK, Subic A (2011) Effects of rugby wheelchair design on output velocity and acceleration. Procedia Eng 13:315–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Usma-Alvarez CC, Fuss FK, Subic A (2014) User-centered design customization of rugby wheelchairs based on the Taguchi method. J Mech Des 136(4):041001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Vanlandewijck YC, Verellen J, Tweedy S (2011) Towards evidence-based classification in wheelchair sports: impact of seating position on wheelchair acceleration. J Sports Sci 29(10):1089–1096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Burkett B (2010) Technology in Paralympic sport: performance enhancement or essential for performance? Br J Sports Med 44(3):215–220

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Altmann VC, Groen BE, van Limbeek J, Vanlandewijck YC, Keijsers NL (2013) Reliability of the revised wheelchair rugby trunk impairment classification system. Spinal Cord 51(12):913–918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Goosey-Tolfrey VL, Leicht CA (2013) Field-based physiological testing of wheelchair athletes. Sports Med 43(2):77–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sporner ML, Grindle GG, Kelleher A, Teodorski EE, Cooper R, Cooper RA (2009) Quantification of activity during wheelchair basketball and rugby at the National Veterans wheelchair games: a pilot study. Prosthet Orthot Int 33(3):210–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Laferrier J, Rice I, Pearlman J, Sporner ML, Cooper R, Liu T, Cooper RA (2012) Technology to improve sports performance in wheelchair sports. Sports Technol 5(1–2):4–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mason B (2011) The ergonomics of wheelchair configuration for optimal sport performance, in sport, exercise and health sciences. Loughborough University, Loughborough

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mason B, Porcellato L, van der Woude LH, Goosey-Tolfrey VL (2010) A qualitative examination of wheelchair configuration for optimal mobility performance in wheelchair sports: a pilot study. J Rehabil Med 42(2):141–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Usma-Alvarez CC, Subic A, Burton M, Fuss FK (2010) Identification of design requirements for rugby wheelchairs using the QFD method. Procedia Eng 2(2):2749–2755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Usma-Alvarez CC (2013) Systems Design Methodology for Personalised Design Customisation of Sports Wheelchairs, in School of Aerospace Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering Science, Engineering and Health College. RMIT University. Melbourne, p 290

  25. Mason B, Van Der Woude LH, Tolfrey K, Lenton JP, Goosey-Tolfrey VL (2012) Effects of wheel and hand-rim size on submaximal propulsion in wheelchair athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc 44(1):126–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Churton E, Keogh J (2013) Constraints influencing sports wheelchair propulsion performance and injury risk. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil 5(3):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  27. Cooper RA, Koontz AM, Ding D, Kelleher A, Rice I, Cooper R (2010) Manual wheeled mobility–—current and future developments from the human engineering research laboratories. Disabil Rehabil 32(26):2210–2221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Cooper RA, De Luigi AJ (2014) Adaptive sports technology and biomechanics: wheelchairs. PM R 6(8 Suppl):S31–S39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Faupin A, Campillo P, Weissland T, Gorce P, Thevenon A (2004) The effects of rear-wheel camber on the mechanical parameters produced during the wheelchair sprinting of handibasketball athletes. J Rehabil Res Dev 41(3B):421–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Goosey-Tolfrey V (2010) Supporting the paralympic athlete focus on wheeled sports. Disabil Rehabil 32(26):2237–2243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. van der Woude LH, Veeger HE, Dallmeijer AJ, Janssen TW, Rozendaal L (2001) Biomechanics and physiology in active manual wheelchair propulsion. Med Eng Phys 23:713–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Berger MAM, van Nieuwenhuizen M, van der Ent M, van der Zande M (2012) Development of a new wheelchair for wheelchair basketball players in the Netherlands. Procedia Eng 34:331–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Rhodes JM, Mason BS, Malone LA, Goosey-Tolfrey VL (2015) Effect of team rank and player classification on activity profiles of elite wheelchair rugby players. J Sports Sci 1–9

  34. Melrose KCC (2014) Rhino script form: offensive—high point. [cited 2015; Available from: http://www.wheelchairs.co.nz/custommade/rugby.html

  35. Crespo-Ruiz B, Del Ama-Espinosa J, Gil-Agudo A (2011) Relation between kinematic analysis of wheelchair propulsion and wheelchair functional basketball classificiation. Adapt Phys Act Q 28:157–172

    Google Scholar 

  36. van der Woude L, Veeger D, Rozendal RH, Sargeant TJ (1989) Seat height in handrim wheelchair propulsion. J Rehabil Res Dev 26(4):31–50

    Google Scholar 

  37. Pinder RA, Headrick J, Oudejans RRD (2015) Issues and challenges in developing representative tasks in sport. In: The Routledge Handbook of Sports Expertise. Baker J, Farrow D (Eds). Routledge, London, pp 269–281

  38. Leary M, Gruijters J, Mazur M, Subic A, Burton M, Fuss FK (2012) A fundamental model of quasi-static wheelchair biomechanics. Med Eng Phys 34(9):1278–1286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Slowik JS, Neptune RR (2013) A theoretical analysis of the influence of wheelchair seat position on upper extremity demand. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 28(4):378–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge with thanks the contribution of the University of Adelaide and the Australian Paralympic Committee for support for this research, as well as the Australian Wheelchair Rugby Team for the access and support provided during data collection.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David S. Haydon.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Haydon, D.S., Pinder, R.A., Grimshaw, P.N. et al. Elite wheelchair rugby: a quantitative analysis of chair configuration in Australia. Sports Eng 19, 177–184 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12283-016-0203-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12283-016-0203-0

Keywords

Navigation