Abstract
The purpose of this work was to develop a new 2D gymnast-high bar model with horizontal bar endpoint dynamics included. To this end, a three-spring high bar model was extended with a five segment gymnast model followed by evaluation and sensitivity analysis. Evaluation over more than a complete giant swing (420°) was favourable (bar position rms errors <0.017 m, center of mass angular position rms error <11°). Single parameter perturbations (10%) caused little deterioration in model performance (lower 180°of the giant swing-bar position rms errors <0.006 m, arms’ angle rms error <0.9°). Combinations of parameter perturbations gave bar position rms errors <0.008 m and arms’ angle rms error <1.8°. Model performance was most sensitive to errors in high bar stiffness values.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arampatzis A, Brüggemann GP (1998) A mathematical high bar-human body model for analysing and interpreting mechanical-energetic processes on the high bar. J Biomech 31:1083–1092
Yeadon MR, Hiley MJ (2000) The mechanics of the backward giant circle on the high bar. Human Movement Science 19:153–173
Hiley MJ, Yeadon MR (2003) The margin for error when releasing the high bar for dismounts. J Biomech 36:313–319
Hiley MJ, Yeadon MR (2003) Optimum technique for generating angular momentum in accelerated backward giant circles prior to a dismount. J Appl Biomechanics 19:119–130
Hiley MJ, Yeadon MR (2005) Maximal dismounts from high bar. J Biomech 38:2221–2227
Hiley MJ, Yeadon MR (2008) Optimization of high bar circling technique for consistent performance of a triple piked somersault dismount. J Biomech 41:1730–1735
Begon M, Wieber PB, Yeadon MR (2008) Kinematics estimation of straddled movements on high bar from a limited number of skin markers using a chain model. J Biomech 41:581–586
Sheets AL, Hubbard M (2008) Evaluation of a subject-specific female gymnast model and simulation of an uneven parallel bar swing. J Biomech 41:3139–3144
Linge S, Hallingstad O (2002) Gymnastics—a new 2D model of the high bar including endpoint movement. Sports Eng 5:81–92
Qualisys Medical AB, Adaptive Optics Associates, Inc (1999) QTracCapture for Microsoft Windows (Version 2.5)
Woltring HJ (1986) A Fortran package for generalized, cross-validatory spline smoothing and differentiation, Adv. Eng Software 8:104–113
The MathWorks Inc (1999) Matlab for Microsoft Windows (Version 5.3.0.10183 (R11))
Horn G, Linge S (1994) Analytical generation of the dynamical equations for mechanical maipulators. Math J 4:67–73
Yeadon MR (1990) The simulation of aerial movement, Part II: A mathematical inertia model of the human body. J Biomech 23:67–74
Dempster WT (1955) Space requirements of the seated operator. WADC-55–159, AD-087–892. Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio
Nelder JA, Mead R (1965) A simplex method for function minimization. Computer J 7:308
Kerwin DG, Hiley MJ (2003) Estimation of reaction forces in high bar swinging. Sports Eng 6:21–30
Acknowledgments
Thanks to the Norwegian School of Sport Sciences for financing early stages of this work. Many thanks to Flemming Solberg for contributing with his European top level gymnastic skills. Also thanks to Olaf Steinsland, Flemming Solberg, Tron Krosshaug, Michael Guttormsen and Oddvar Hallingstad for helpful discussions.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Experimental data and a preliminary version of the high bar-gymnast model presented herein were part of the author’s unpublished Dr. Scient. Thesis “Modelling and Analysing the high bar-gymnast system”, The Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, 2001.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Linge, S.O. Men’s Artistic Gymnastics: a new high bar-gymnast model with sensitivity analysis. Sports Eng 14, 39 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12283-011-0069-0
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12283-011-0069-0