Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Docetaxel and cyclophosphamide as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-negative primary breast cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Docetaxel plus cyclophosphamide (TC) has recently been established as a standard adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for HER2-negative (HER2−) operable breast cancer. However, the efficacy and tolerability of TC as neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) remain unclear. We, therefore, conducted a prospective study to evaluate the efficacy of TC NAC in HER2− primary breast cancer.

Methods

Patients who were diagnosed with HER2−, N0–N1, invasive breast cancer between July 2011 and February 2014 and had tumors measuring 1–7 cm were eligible. The subtypes were classified using a core-needle or vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. The efficacy and safety of NAC comprising TC (75 mg/m2 docetaxel and 600 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide, four cycles every 3 weeks) were investigated in a prospective study in patients with HER2− breast cancer.

Results

Fifty-two patients were enrolled. Of these, 94.2 % (49/52) completed four cycles of TC. The overall pCR rate was 16.3 % (8/49). The pCR rates for patients with luminal A-like breast cancer [estrogen receptor-positive (ER+), Ki67 index of <20 %, and HER2−], luminal B-like breast cancer (ER+, Ki67 index of >20 %, and HER2−), and triple-negative breast cancer [ER-negative (ER−) and HER2−] were 0 % (0/12), 4.3 % (1/23), and 50.0 % (7/14), respectively. Almost all pCRs occurred in triple-negative breast cancer patients.

Conclusions

The pCR rate of TC NAC was not very high despite the high completion rate. TC NAC was effective against the triple-negative subtype, resulting in a higher pCR rate. Therefore, our results indicated that TC NAC showed limited efficacy in luminal subtype breast cancer with the exception of the triple-negative subtype.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wolmark N, Wnag J, Mamounas E, Bryant J, Fisher B. Prospective chemotherapy in patients with operable breast cancer: nine-year results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-18. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2001;30:96–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bear HD, Anderson S, Brown A, Smith R, Mamounas EP, Fisher B, et al. The effect on tumor response of adding sequential preoperative docetaxel to preoperative doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide: preliminary results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-27. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:4165–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Heys SD, Hutcheon AW, Sarkar TK, Ogston KN, Miller ID, Payne S, et al. Neoadjuvant docetaxel in breast cancer: 3-year survival results from the Aberdeen trial. Clin Breast Cancer. 2002;3(Suppl 2):S69–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Henderson IC, Berry DA, Demetri GD, Cirrincione CT, Goldstein LJ, Martino S, et al. Improved outcomes from adding sequential paclitaxel but not from escalating doxorubicin dose in an adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for patients with node-positive primary breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:976–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jones S, Holmes FA, O’Shaughnessy J, Blum JL, Vukelja SJ, McIntyre KJ, et al. Docetaxel with cyclophosphamide is associated with an overall survival benefit compared with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide: 7-year follow-up of US Oncology Research Trial 9735. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:1177–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. von Minckwitz G, Costa SD, Raab G, Blohmer JU, Eidtmann H, Hilfrich J, et al. Dose-dense doxorubicin, docetaxel, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support with or without tamoxifen as preoperative therapy in patients with operable carcinoma of the breast: a randomized, controlled, open phase IIb study. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:3506–15.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dieras V, Fumoleau P, Romieu G, Tubiana-Hulin M, Namer M, Mauriac L, et al. Randomized parallel study of doxorubicin plus paclitaxel and doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide as neoadjuvant treatment of patients with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:4958–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Buzdar AU. Preoperative chemotherapy treatment of breast cancer—a review. Cancer. 2007;110:2394–407.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. von Minckwitz G, Untch M, Blohmer JU, Costa SD, Eidtmann H, Fasching PA, et al. Definition and impact of pathologic complete response on prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in various intrinsic breast cancer subtypes. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:1796–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Carey LA, Dees EC, Sawyer L, Gatti L, Moore DT, Collichio F, et al. The triple negative paradox: primary tumor chemosensitivity of breast cancer subtypes. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:2329–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Liedtke C, Mazouni C, Hess KR, Andre F, Tordai A, Mejia JA, et al. Response to neoadjuvant therapy and long-term survival in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:1275–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Toi M, Nakamura S, Kuroi K, Iwata H, Ohno S, Masuda N, et al. Phase II study of preoperative sequential FEC and docetaxel predicts of pathological response and disease free survival. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008;110:531–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Goldhirsch A, Winer EP, Coates AS, Gelber RD, Piccart-Gebhart M, Thurlimann B, et al. Personalizing the treatment of women with early breast cancer: highlights of the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2013. Ann Oncol. 2013;24:2206–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Cortazar P, Zhang L, Untch M, Mehta K, Costantino JP, Wolmark N, et al. Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: the CTNeoBC pooled analysis. Lancet. 2014;384:164–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fujii T, Le Du F, Xiao L, Kogawa T, Carlos H, et al. Effectiveness of an adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for early-stage breast cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol. 2015;1(9):1311–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Takabatake D, Taira N, Hara F, Sien T, Kiyoto S, Takashima S, et al. Feasibility study of docetaxel with cyclophosphamide as adjuvant chemotherapy for Japanese breast cancer patients. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2009;39:478–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cortes JE, Pazdur R. Docetaxel. J Clin Oncol. 1995;13:2643–55.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katsuhiko Nakatsukasa.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nakatsukasa, K., Koyama, H., Oouchi, Y. et al. Docetaxel and cyclophosphamide as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-negative primary breast cancer. Breast Cancer 24, 63–68 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-016-0666-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-016-0666-7

Keywords

Navigation