Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Long-term prognoses and outcomes of axillary lymph node recurrence in 2,578 sentinel lymph node-negative patients for whom axillary lymph node dissection was omitted: results from one Japanese hospital

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Axillary dissection omission for sentinel lymph node-negative patients has been a practice at Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research since 2003. We examined the long-term results of omission of axillary dissection in sentinel lymph node-negative patients treated at our hospital, as well as their axillary lymph node recurrence characteristics and outcomes.

Methods

Our study included 2,578 patients with cTis or T1-T3N0M0 primary breast cancer for whom dissection was omitted because they were sentinel lymph node negative. The median observation period was 75 months.

Results

In sentinel lymph node-negative patients for whom dissection was omitted, the rates of axillary lymph node recurrence, distant recurrence, and breast cancer mortality were 0.9, 2, and 1 %, respectively. Eighteen patients underwent additional dissection if axillary lymph node recurrence was observed at the first recurrence. Four triple-negative (TN) patients experienced distant recurrence after additional dissection. All four patients were administered anticancer agents after axillary lymph node recurrence and experienced recurrence within 1 year of additional dissection. The axillary lymph node recurrence rate was 0.8 % for luminal and 4.5 % for TN subtypes.

Conclusions

The long-term prognoses of patients for whom dissection was omitted owing to negative sentinel lymph node metastases were similar to those reported previously—low recurrence and mortality rates. The frequency of axillary lymph node recurrence and the post-recurrence outcome differed between luminal and TN cases, with recurrence being more frequent in patients with the TN subtype. TN patients also had poorer prognoses, even after receiving additional dissection and anticancer agents after recurrence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cabanas RM. An approach for the treatment of penile carcinoma. Cancer. 1977;39:456–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Morton DL, Wen DR, Wong JH, Economou JS, Cagle LA, Storm FK, et al. Technical details of intraoperative lymphatic mapping for early stage melanoma. Arch Surg. 1992;127:392–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Krag DN, Weaver DL, Alex JC, Fairbank JT. Surgical resection and radiolocalization of the sentinel lymph node in breast cancer using a gamma probe. Surg Oncol. 1993;2:335–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Giuliano AE, Kirgan DM, Guenther JM, Morton DL. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast cancer. Ann Surg. 1994;220:391–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Viale G, Luini A, Zurrida S, Galimberti V, et al. Sentinel-lymph-node biopsy as a staging procedure in breast cancer: update of a randomised controlled study. Lancet Oncol. 2006;7:983–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Krag DN, Anderson SJ, Julian TB, Brown AM, Harlow SP, Costantino JP, et al. Sentinel-lymph-node resection compared with conventional axillary-lymph-node dissection in clinically node-negative patients with breast cancer: overall survival findings from the NSABP B-32 randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11:927–33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Lyman GH, Temin S, Edge SB, Newman LA, Turner RR, Weaver DL, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy for patients with early-stage breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:1365–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Japanese Breast Cancer Society. Clinical practice guidelines 2013. Tokyo: Kanehara shuppan; 2013. p. 216–8.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Koizumi M, Nomura E, Yamada Y, Takiguchi T, Makita M, Iwase T, et al. Radioguided sentinel node detection in breast cancer patients: comparison of 99mTc phytate and 99mTc rhenium colloid efficacy. Nucl Med Commun. 2004;25:1031–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Koizumi M, Koyama M, Yamashita T, Tada K, Nishimura S, Takahashi K, et al. Experience with intradermal injection and intradermal-plus-deep injection in the radioguided sentinel node biopsy of early breast cancer patients. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2006;32:738–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Osako T, Iwase T, Kimura K, Yamashita K, Horii R, Yanagisawa A, et al. Intraoperative molecular assay for sentinel lymph node metastases in early stage breast cancer: a comparative analysis between one-step nucleic acid amplification whole node assay and routine frozen section histology. Cancer. 2011;117:4365–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zavagno G, De Salvo GL, Scalco G, Bozza F, Barutta L, Del Bianco P, et al. A randomized clinical trial on sentinel lymph node biopsy versus axillary lymph node dissection in breast cancer: results of the Sentinella/GIVOM trial. Ann Surg. 2008;247:207–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bulte JP, van Wely BJ, Kasper S, Kuijt G, van den Wildenberg FJ, Strobbe LJ, et al. Long-term follow-up of axillary recurrences after negative sentinel lymph node biopsy: effect on prognosis and survival. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;140:143–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. NCCN Clinical practice guidelines in oncology. BINV-8, ver 3. 2014.

  15. Pepels MJ, de Boer M, Bult P, van Dijck JA, van Deurzen CH, Menke-Pluymers MB, et al. Regional recurrence in breast cancer patients with sentinel node micrometastases and isolated tumor cells. Ann Surg. 2012;255:116–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Akiko Ogiya.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ogiya, A., Kimura, K., Nakashima, E. et al. Long-term prognoses and outcomes of axillary lymph node recurrence in 2,578 sentinel lymph node-negative patients for whom axillary lymph node dissection was omitted: results from one Japanese hospital. Breast Cancer 23, 318–322 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-014-0576-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-014-0576-5

Keywords

Navigation