Skip to main content
Log in

Large-scale dendrimer-based uneven nanopatterns for the study of local arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (RGD) density effects on cell adhesion

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Nano Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cell adhesion processes are governed by the nanoscale arrangement of the extracellular matrix (ECM), being more affected by local rather than global concentrations of cell adhesive ligands. In many cell-based studies, grafting of dendrimers on surfaces has shown the benefits of the local increase in concentration provided by the dendritic configuration, although the lack of any reported surface characterization has limited any direct correlation between dendrimer disposition and cell response. In order to establish a proper correlation, some control over dendrimer surface deposition is desirable. Here, dendrimer nanopatterning has been employed to address arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (RGD) density effects on cell adhesion. Nanopatterned surfaces were fully characterized by atomic force microscopy (AFM), scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), showing that tunable distributions of cell adhesive ligands on the surface are obtained as a function of the initial dendrimer bulk concentration. Cell experiments showed a clear correlation with dendrimer surface layout: Substrates presenting regions of high local ligand density resulted in a higher percentage of adhered cells and a higher degree of maturation of focal adhesions (FAs). Therefore, dendrimer nanopatterning is presented as a suitable and controlled approach to address the effect of local ligand density on cell response. Moreover, due to the easy modification of dendrimer peripheral groups, dendrimer nanopatterning can be further extended to other ECM ligands having density effects on cells.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mager, D. M.; LaPointe, V.; Stevens, M. M. Exploring and exploiting chemistry at the cell surface. Nat. Chem. 2011, 3, 582–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Geiger, B.; Spatz, J. P.; Bershadsky, A. D. Environmental sensing through focal adhesions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2009, 10, 21–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Geiger, B.; Bershadsky, A.; Pankov, R.; Yamada, K. M. Transmembrane extracellular matrix-cytoskeleton crosstalk. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2001, 2, 793–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Vogel, V.; Sheetz, M. Local force and geometry sensing regulate cell functions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2006, 7, 265–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Smith, M. L.; Gourdon, D.; Little, W. C.; Kubow, K. E.; Eguiluz, R. A.; Luna-Morris, S.; Vogel, V. Force-induced unfolding of fibronectin in the extracellular matrix of living cells. PLoS Biol. 2007, 5, 2243–2254.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jiang, F.; Hörber, H.; Howard, J.; Müller, D. J. Assembly of collagen into microribbons: Effects of pH and electrolytes. J. Struct. Biol. 2004, 148, 268–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Abrams, G. A.; Goodman, S. L.; Nealey, P. F.; Franco, M.; Murphy, C. J. Nanoscale topography of the basement membrane underlying the corneal epithelium of the rhesus macaque. Cell Tissue Res. 2000, 299, 39–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Christman, K. L.; Enriquez-Rios, V. D.; Maynard, H. D. Nanopatterning proteins and peptides. Soft Matter 2006, 2, 928–939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Falconnet, D.; Csucs, G.; Grandin, H. M.; Textor, M. Surface engineering approaches to micropattern surfaces for cell-based assays. Biomaterials 2006, 27, 3044–3063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Arnold, M.; Schwieder, M.; Blümmel, J.; Cavalcanti-Adam, E. A.; López-Garcia, M.; Kessler, H.; Geiger, B.; Spatz, J. P. Cell interactions with hierarchically structured nano-patterned adhesive surface. Soft Matter 2009, 5, 72–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Malmström, J.; Christensen, B.; Jakobsen, H. P.; Lovmand, J.; Foldbjerg, R.; Sørensen, E. S.; Sutherland, D. S. Large area protein patterning reveals nanoscale control of focal adhesion development. Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 686–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Deeg, J. A.; Louban, I.; Aydin, D.; Selhuber-Unkel, C.; Kessler, H.; Spatz, J. P. Impact of local versus global ligand density on cellular adhesion. Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 1469–1476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rolland, O.; Turrin, C. O.; Caminade, A. M.; Majoral, J. P. Dendrimers and nanomedicine: Multivalency in action. New J. Chem. 2009, 33, 1809–1824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Saovapakhiran, A.; D’Emanuele, A.; Attwood, D.; Penny, J. Surface modification of PAMAM dendrimers modulates the mechanism of cellular internalization. Bioconjug. Chem. 2009, 20, 693–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Albertazzi, L.; Fernandez-Villamarin, M.; Riguera, R.; Fernandez-Megia, E. Peripheral functionalization of dendrimers regulates internalization and intracelular trafficking in living cells. Bioconjug. Chem. 2012, 23, 1059–1068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mikhail, A. S.; Jones, K. S.; Sheardown, H. Dendrimer-grafted cell adhesion peptide-modified PDMS. Biotechnol. Prog. 2008, 24, 938–944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kino-oka, M.; Kim, J.; Kurisaka, K.; Kim, M. H. Preferential growth of skeletal myoblasts and fibroblasts in co-culture on a dendrimer-immobilized surface. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2013, 115, 96–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lomba, M.; Oriol, L.; Sánchez-Somolinos, C.; Grazú, V.; Moros, M.; Serrano, J. L.; Martínez De la Fuente, J. Cell adhesion on surface patterns generated by the photocrosslinking of hyperbranched polyesters with a trisdiazonium salt. React. Funct. Polym. 2013, 73, 499–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kim, M. H.; Kino-oka, M.; Morinaga, Y.; Sawada, Y.; Kawase, M.; Yagi, K.; Taya, M. Morphological regulation and aggregate formation of rabbit chondrocytes on dendrimer-immobilized surfaces with D-glucose display. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2009, 107, 196–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim, M. H.; Kino-oka, M.; Kawase, M.; Yagi, K.; Taya, M. Synergistic effect of D-glucose and epidermal growth factor display on dynamic behaviors of human epithelial cells. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2007, 104, 428–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Maheshwari, G.; Brown, G.; Lauffenburger, D. A.; Wells, A.; Griffith, L. G. Cell adhesion and motility depend on nanoscale RGD clutering. J. Cell Sci. 2000, 113, 1677–1686.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pericet-Camara, R.; Cahill, B. P.; Papastavrou, G.; Borkovec, M. Nano-patterning of solid substrates by adsorbed dendrimers. Chem. Commun. 2007, 3, 266–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tokuhisa, H.; Zhao, M. Q.; Baker, L. A.; Phan, V. T.; Dermody, D. L.; Garcia, M. E.; Peez, R. F.; Crooks, R. M.; Mayer, T. M. Preparation and characterization of dendrimer monolayers and dendrimer-alkanethiol mixed monolayers adsorbed to gold. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 4492–4501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pericet-Camara, R.; Papastavrou, G.; Borkovec, M. Atomic force microscopy study of the adsorption and electrostatic self-organization of poly(amidoamine) dendrimers on mica. Langmuir 2004, 20, 3264–3270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Li, J.; Piehler, L. T.; Qin, D.; Baker, J. R.; Tomalia, D. A. Visualization and characterization of poly(amidoamine) dendrimers by atomic force microscopy. Langmuir 2000, 16, 5613–5616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mertz, L.; Hitz, J.; Hubler, U.; Weyermann, P.; Diederich, F.; Murer, P.; Seebach, D.; Widmer, I.; Stöhr, M.; Güntherodt, H. J., et al. STM investigation on single, physisorbed dendrimers. Single Mol. 2002, 5, 295–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Horcas, I.; Fernández, R.; Gómez-Rodríguez, J. M.; Colchero, J.; Gómez-Herrero, J.; Baro, A. M. WSXM: A software for scanning probe microscopy and a tool for nanotechnology. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2007, 78, 13705–13713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Prats-Alfonso, E.; García-Martín, F.; Bayo, N.; Cruz, L. J.; Pla-Roca, M.; Samitier, J.; Errachid, A.; Albericio, F. Facile solid-phase synthesis of biotinylated alkyl thiols. Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 6876–6881.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Boas, U.; Heegaard, P. M. Dendrimers in drug research. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2004, 33, 43–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhou, M.; Bentley, D.; Ghosh, I. Helical supramolecules and fibers utilizing leucine zipper-displaying dendrimers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 734–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhou, M.; Ghosh, I. Noncovalent multivalent assembly of Jun peptides on a leucine zipper dendrimer displaying Fos peptides. Org. Lett. 2004, 20, 3561–3564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Huang, J. H.; Gräter, S. V.; Corbellini, F.; Rinck, S.; Bock, E.; Kemkemer, R.; Kessler, H.; Ding, J. D.; Spatz, J. P. Impact of order and disorder in RGD nanopatterns on cell adhesion. Nano Lett. 2009, 9, 1111–1116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Xiong, J. P.; Stehle, T.; Zhang, R. G.; Joachimiak, A.; Frech, M.; Goodman, S. L.; Arnaout, M. A. Crystal structure of the extracellular segment of integrin αVβ3 in complex with an Arg-Gly-Asp ligand. Science 2002, 296, 151–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Arnold, M.; Cavalcanti-Adam, E. A.; Glass, R.; Blümmel, J.; Eck, W.; Kantlehner, M.; Kessler, H.; Spatz, J. P. Activation of integrin function by nanopatterned adhesive interfaces. ChemPhysChem. 2004, 5, 383–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Liu, L.; Chen, S.; Giachelli, C. M.; Ratner, B. D.; Jiang, S. Controlling osteopontin orientation on surfaces to modulate endothelial cell adhesion. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2005, 74A, 23–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Tatkiewicz, W. I.; Seras-Franzoso, J.; García-Fruitós, E.; Vazquez, E.; Ventosa, N.; Peebo, K.; Ratera, I.; Villaverde, A.; Veciana, J. Two-dimensional microscale engineering of protein-based nanoparticles for cell guidance. ACS Nano 2013, 7, 4774–4784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Lehnert, D.; Wehrle-Haller, B.; David, C.; Welland, U.; Ballestrem, C.; Imhol, B. A.; Bastmeyer, M. Cell behavior on micropatterned substrata: Limits of extracellular matrix geometry for spreading and adhesion. J. Cell Sci. 2004, 117, 41–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Schaller, M. D. Paxillin: A focal adhesion-associated adaptor protein. Oncogene 2001, 20, 6459–6472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Cavalcanti-Adam, E. A.; Volberg, T.; Micoulet, A.; Kessler, H.; Geiger, B.; Spatz, J. P. Cell spreading and focal adhesion dynamics are regulated by spacing of integrin ligands. Biophys. J. 2007, 92, 2964–2974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Irvine, D. J.; Hue, K. A.; Mayes, A. M.; Griffith, L. G. Simulations of cell-surface integrin binding to nanoscale- clustered adhesion ligands. Biophys. J. 2002, 82, 120–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Comisar, W. A.; Mooney, D. J.; Linderman, J. J. Integrin organization: Linking adhesion ligand nanopatterns with altered cell responses. J. Theor. Biol. 2011, 274, 120–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Lagunas.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lagunas, A., Castaño, A.G., Artés, J.M. et al. Large-scale dendrimer-based uneven nanopatterns for the study of local arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (RGD) density effects on cell adhesion. Nano Res. 7, 399–409 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-014-0406-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-014-0406-2

Keywords

Navigation