Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clustering and switching during a semantic verbal fluency test contribute to differential diagnosis of cognitive impairment

Neuroscience Bulletin Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The verbal fluency test (VFT) can be dissociated into “clustering” (generating words within subcategories) and “switching” (shifting between clusters), which may be valuable in differential diagnosis. In the current study, we investigated the validity of VFT in the differential diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD, n = 65), vascular dementia (VaD, n = 65), mild cognitive impairment (MCI, n = 92), and vascular cognitive impairment without dementia (VCIND, n = 76) relative to cognitively normal senior controls (NC, n = 374). We found that in the NC group, the total correct score was significantly correlated with age and education; males generated more subcategories; cluster size increased with education, and subcategory and switching decreased with age. A significantly progressive advantage was observed in VFT scores in the sequence NC > MCI/VCIND > AD/VaD, and this significantly discriminated dementia patients from the other groups. AD patients performed better in all four VFT scores than VaD patients. Subcategory and switching scores significantly distinguished AD from VaD patients (AD > VaD; mean difference, 0.50 for subcategory, P <0.05; 0.71 for switching, P <0.05). MCI patients scored higher than VCIND patients, but the difference did not reach statistical significance. These results suggest that semantic VFT is useful for the detection of MCI and VCIND, and in the differential diagnosis of cognitive impairment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Strauss E, Sherman EMS, Spreen O. A Compendium of Neuropsychological Tests. Administration, Norms, and Commentary. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Henry JD, Crawford JR, Phillips LH. Verbal fluency performance in dementia of the Alzheimer’s type: a meta-analysis. Neuropsychologia 2004, 42: 1212–1222.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Troyer AK, Moscovitch M, Winocur G. Clustering and switching as two components of verbal fluency: evidence from younger and older healthy adults. Neuropsychology 1997, 11: 138–146.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Troyer AK, Moscovitch M, Winocur G, Leach L, Freedman M. Clustering and switching on verbal fluency tests in Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 1998, 4: 137–143.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Royall DR, Roman GC. Differentiation of vascular dementia from AD on neuropsychological tests. Neurology 2000, 55: 604–606.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Oguro H, Yamaguchi S, Abe S, Ishida Y, Bokura H, Kobayashi S. Differentiating Alzheimer’s disease from subcortical vascular dementia with the FAB test. J Neurol 2006, 253: 1490–1494.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Looi JC, Sachdev PS. Differentiation of vascular dementia from AD on neuropsychological tests. Neurology 1999, 53: 670–678.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lafosse JM, Reed BR, Mungas D, Sterling SB, Wahbeh H, Jagust WJ. Fluency and memory differences between ischemic vascular dementia and Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychology 1997, 11: 514–522.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Blackburn K, Bjerke D, Daston G, Felter S, Mahony C, Naciff J, et al. Case studies to test: A framework for using structural, reactivity, metabolic and physicochemical similarity to evaluate the suitability of analogs for SAR-based toxicological assessments. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2011, 60: 120–135.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Nutter-Upham KE, Saykin AJ, Rabin LA, Roth RM, Wishart HA, Pare N, et al. Verbal fluency performance in amnestic MCI and older adults with cognitive complaints. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 2008, 23: 229–241.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Desmond DW. The neuropsychology of vascular cognitive impairment: is there a specific cognitive deficit? J Neurol Sci 2004, 226: 3–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Murphy KJ, Rich JB, Troyer AK. Verbal fluency patterns in amnestic mild cognitive impairment are characteristic of Alzheimer’s type dementia. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2006, 12: 570–574.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tierney MC, Fisher RH, Lewis AJ, Zorzitto ML, Snow WG, Reid DW, et al. The NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group criteria for the clinical diagnosis of probable Alzheimer’s disease: a clinicopathologic study of 57 cases. Neurology 1988, 38: 359–364.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Erkinjuntti T. Clinical criteria for vascular dementia: the NINDS-AIREN criteria. Dementia 1994, 5: 189–192.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Petersen RC. Mild cognitive impairment as a diagnostic entity. J Intern Med 2004, 256: 183–194.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Guo Q, Zhao Q, Chen M, Ding D, Hong Z. A comparison study of mild cognitive impairment with 3 memory tests among Chinese individuals. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 2009, 23: 253–259.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hachinski V, Iadecola C, Petersen RC, Breteler MM, Nyenhuis DL, Black SE, et al. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke-Canadian Stroke Network vascular cognitive impairment harmonization standards. Stroke 2006, 37: 2220–2241.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cao X, Guo Q, Zhao Q, Jin L, Fu J, Hong Z. The neuropsychological characteristics and regional cerebral blood flow of vascular cognitive impairment-no dementia. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2010, 25(11): 1168–1176.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Katzman R, Zhang MY, Ouang-Ya-Qu, Wang ZY, Liu WT, Yu E, et al. A Chinese version of the Mini-Mental State Examination; impact of illiteracy in a Shanghai dementia survey. J Clin Epidemiol 1988, 41: 971–978.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Schmidt R, Freidl W, Fazekas F, Reinhart B, Grieshofer P, Koch M, et al. The Mattis Dementia Rating Scale: normative data from 1,001 healthy volunteers. Neurology 1994, 44: 964–966.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Gardner R Jr, Oliver-Munoz S, Fisher L, Empting L. Mattis Dementia Rating Scale: internal reliability study using a diffusely impaired population. J Clin Neuropsychol 1981, 3: 271–275.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Guo Q, LV C, Hong Z. Auditory verbal memory test in Chinese elderly. Chin J Ment Health 2001, 15: 13–15.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Yu H, Guo H, Hong Z, Lv C. Logic Memory Test in early detection of Alzheimer’s disease. Nerve Dis Ment Hyg 2005, 5: 89–91.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Guo Q, Lv C, Hong Z. Application of Rey-Osterrieth complex figure test in Chinese normal old people. Chin J Clin Psychol 2000, 8: 205–207.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Guo Q, Hong Z, Lv C. Application of Stroop color-word test on Chinese elderly patients with mild cognitive impairment and mild Alzheimer’s dementia. Chin J Neuromed 2005, 4: 701–704.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lu J, Guo Q, Hong Z. Trail making test used by Chinese elderly patients with mild cognitive impairment and mild Alzheimer dementia. Chin J Clin Psychol 2006, 14: 118–121.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Guo Q, Hong Z, Shi W, Sun Y, Lv C. Boston Naming Test in Chinese elderly, patient with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s dementia. Chin Ment Health J 2006, 20: 81–84.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Schein RL, Koenig HG. The Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression (CES-D) Scale: assessment of depression in the medically ill elderly. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 1997, 12: 436–446.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Staff PH. ADL-assessment. Scand J Rehabil Med Suppl 1980, 7: 153–157.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Juva K, Sulkava R, Erkinjuntti T, Ylikoski R, Valvanne J, Tilvis R. Usefulness of the clinical dementia rating scale in screening for dementia. Int Psychogeriatr 1995, 7: 17–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Haugrud N, Lanting S, Crossley M. The effects of age, sex and Alzheimer’s disease on strategy use during verbal fluency tasks. Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn 2010, 17: 220–239.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lanting S, Haugrud N, Crossley M. The effect of age and sex on clustering and switching during speeded verbal fluency tasks. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2009, 15: 196–204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Jones S, Laukka EJ, Backman L. Differential verbal fluency deficits in the preclinical stages of Alzheimer’s disease and vascular dementia. Cortex 2006, 42: 347–355.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Traykov L, Baudic S, Thibaudet MC, Rigaud AS, Smagghe A, Boller F. Neuropsychological deficit in early subcortical vascular dementia: comparison to Alzheimer’s disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2002, 14: 26–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sachdev PS, Brodaty H, Valenzuela MJ, Lorentz L, Looi JC, Wen W, et al. The neuropsychological profile of vascular cognitive impairment in stroke and TIA patients. Neurology 2004, 62: 912–919.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Brucki SM, Rocha MS. Category fluency test: effects of age, gender and education on total scores, clustering and switching in Brazilian Portuguese-speaking subjects. Braz J Med Biol Res 2004, 37: 1771–1777.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qihao Guo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhao, Q., Guo, Q. & Hong, Z. Clustering and switching during a semantic verbal fluency test contribute to differential diagnosis of cognitive impairment. Neurosci. Bull. 29, 75–82 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12264-013-1301-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12264-013-1301-7

Keywords

Navigation