Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Abdominoperineal Excisions in the Treatment Regimen for Advanced and Recurrent Vulvar Cancers—Analysis of a Single-Centre Experience

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Vulva cancer is the fourth leading gynaecological malignancy, accounting for approximately 4 % of all gynaecological cancers. Surgery represents the treatment of choice, and cases of advanced or recurrent vulvar cancers are to date a major challenge to multidisciplinary teams. Abdominoperineal excision (APE) in combination with vulvectomy and inguinal lymphadenectomy is the only curative treatment option. Patients’ files of all women with squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva who underwent abdominoperineal resection were retrospectively reviewed with special regards to technical challenges the general surgeon will face. Seven women were enrolled in this retrospective study with a median age of 71 years (range 56–79 years). In six patients, the pelvic floor after abdominoperineal excision could be closed by direct suture of the levator muscles. One woman underwent abdominoperineal resection with closure of the defect using a vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous (VRAM) flap. All women underwent radical vulvectomy, in five patients in combination with bilateral inguinal lymph node dissection. Operation time was 377 min (range 130–505 min). The median overall survival after surgery was 27 months (range 4–84 months), with a calculated 5-year survival rate of 42 %. Women with negative lymph nodes revealed a longer survival time after surgery compared to women with lymph node metastases (15.5 vs. 72 months; p = 0.09). Abdominoperineal excisions represent a powerful tool in the multidisciplinary treatment regimen of advanced or recurrent vulvar cancer. Reconstruction of the pelvic floor usually does not require myocutaneous flaps, even when facing large tumours. Despite high complication rates, radical surgery was a feasible treatment with long-term survival potential without mortality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Murray T, Xu J, Smigal C et al (2006) Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 56:106–302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sturgeon SR, Brinton LA, Devesa SS, Kurman RJ (1992) In situ and invasive vulvar cancer incidence trends (1973 to 1987). Am J Obstet Gynecol 166:1482–1485

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Taussig FJ (1940) Cancer of the vulva: an analysis of 155 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 40:764–779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Baiocchia G, Rocha RM (2014) Vulvar cancer surgery. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 26:9–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Raspagliesi F, Zanaboni F, Martinelli F, Scasso S, Laufer J, Ditto A (2014) Role of paclitaxel and cisplatin as the neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva. J Gynecol Oncol 25(1):22–29

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Park JY, Choi HJ, Jeong SY, Chung J, Park JK, Park SY (2007) The role of pelvic exenteration and reconstruction for treatment of advanced or recurrent gynecologic malignancies: analysis of risk factors predicting recurrence and survival. J Surg Oncol 96(7):560–568

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ang C, Bryant A, Barton DP, Pomel C, Naik R (2014) Exenterative surgery for recurrent gynaecological malignancies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2, CD010449

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD et al (2009) The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250(2):187–196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. De Hullu JA, Hollema H, Lolkema S et al (2002) Vulvar carcinoma. The price of less radical surgery. Cancer 95:2331–2338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Woelber L, Choschzick M, Eulenburg C, Hager M, Jaenicke F, Gieseking F et al (2011) Prognostic value of pathological resection margin distance in squamous cell cancer of the vulva. Ann Surg Oncol 18(13):3811–3818

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Van der Zee AG, Oonk MH, De Hullu JA, Ansink AC, Vergote I, Verheijen RH et al (2008) Sentinel node dissection is safe in the treatment of early-stage vulvar cancer. J Clin Oncol 26(6):884–889

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Levenback CF, Ali S, Coleman RL, Gold MA, Fowler JM, Judson PL et al (2012) Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy in women with squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva: a gynecologic oncology group study. J Clin Oncol 30(31):3786–3791

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Habbe N, Reinisch A, Bechstein WO, Hannes S (2014) Lymph fistulas after inguinal lymph node dissection—assessment of risk factors and future treatment strategies. Surg Sci 5:193–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Prytz M, Angenete E, Ekelund J, Haglind E (2014) Extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) for rectal cancer–short-term results from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry. Selective use of ELAPE warranted. Int J Color Dis 29(8):981–987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Palmer G, Anderin C, Martling A, Holm T (2014) Local control and survival after extralevator abdominoperineal excision for locally advanced or low rectal cancer. Color Dis 16(7):527–532

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Benn T, Brooks RA, Zhang Q, Powell MA, Thaker PH, Mutch DG et al (2011) Pelvic exenteration in gynecologic oncology: a single institution study over 20 years. Gynecol Oncol 122(1):14–18

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jäger L, Nilsson PJ, Rådestad AF (2013) Pelvic exenteration for recurrent gynecologic malignancy: a study of 28 consecutive patients at a single institution. Int J Gynecol Cancer 23(4):755–762

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Baiocchi G, Guimaraes GC, Rosa Oliveira RA, Kumagai LY, Faloppa CC, Aguiar S et al (2012) Prognostic factors in pelvic exenteration for gynecological malignancies. Eur J Surg Oncol 38(10):948–954

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Shabbir J, Chaudhary BN, Dawson R (2012) A systematic review on the use of prophylactic mesh during primary stoma formation to prevent parastomal hernia formation. Color Dis 14(8):931–936

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Miller B, Morris M, Levenback C, Burke TW, Gershenson DM (1995) Pelvic exenteration for primary and recurrent vulvar cancer. Gynecol Oncol 58(2):202–205

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Blecharz P, Karolewski K, Bieda T, Klimek M, Pudelek J, Kojs E et al (2008) Prognostic factors in patients with carcinoma of the vulva—our own experience and literature review. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 29(3):260–263

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sznurkowski JJ, Milczek T, Emerich J (2013) Prognostic factors and a value of 2009 FIGO staging system in vulvar cancer. Arch Gynecol Obstet 287(6):1211–1218

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nils Habbe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hannes, S., Nijboer, J.M., Reinisch, A. et al. Abdominoperineal Excisions in the Treatment Regimen for Advanced and Recurrent Vulvar Cancers—Analysis of a Single-Centre Experience. Indian J Surg 77 (Suppl 3), 1270–1274 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-015-1273-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-015-1273-0

Keywords

Navigation