Skip to main content
Log in

PID Controller Modelling and Optimization in Cr Systems with Standard and Reduced Accumulators

  • Published:
International Journal of Automotive Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The proportional-integrative-derivative (PID) controller and the pressure control valve of a Common Rail system are modelled by taking into account electronic, electrical, hydraulic and mechanical aspects. A fully predictive model of the injection apparatus is realized and validated by means of comparison with experimental data. The effects of the PID parameters on the injection system dynamics are illustrated and discussed on the basis of model results, which refer to steadystate and transient working conditions. The influence of the accumulator size on the rail pressure time history is investigated when the rail volume is dramatically reduced (up to 2.5 cm3). In particular, the effect of the large rail pressure drop that occurs at the end of the main injection for Minirail layout solutions is examined when after injections are implemented. An objective is to try to determine possible suitable values of the PID controller parameters and of the pressure-sensor sampling-frequency for rails of reduced size.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

A :

restricted flow-area

C :

geometric constant of the magnetic circuit

CR :

common rail

D :

diameter of the valve seat; derivative part

ET :

energizing time

F :

force

G :

system transfer function; mass flow-rate

I :

electric current; integrative part

K :

gain

M :

mass

P :

proportional part

PCV :

pressure control valve

PID :

proportional-integrative-derivative control

PWM :

pulse width modulation

V :

volume

S :

surface

f :

frequency

k :

spring stiffness

m :

valve armature mass

n :

engine speed

p :

pressure

x, , :

valve displacement, velocity and acceleration

α :

valve-seat cone semi-angle

β :

valve damping coefficient

Δp :

pressure drop

θ :

flux-force angle

μ :

flow coefficient

after :

after injection

d :

derivative part

fl :

flux forces

i :

integrative part

inj :

injected

p :

proportional part

mag :

magnetic

main :

main injection

nom :

nominal value

pc :

pressure control

tot :

total

References

  • Åström, K. J. and Hägglund, T. (1995). PID Controllers: Theory, Design and Tuning. 2nd edn. International Society of America. North Carolina, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aydogdu, O. and Korkmaz, M. (2011). A simple approach to design of variable parameter nonlinear PID controller. Int. Conf. Advancements in Information Technology, Chennai, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baratta, M., Catania, A. E. and Ferrari, A. (2008). Hydraulic circuit design rules to remove the dependence of the injected fuel amount on dwell time in multijet CRsystems. J. Fluids Engineering 130, 12, 121104–1–121104–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catania, A. E. and Ferrari, A. (2011). Experimnetal analysis, modelling and control of volumetric radial-piston pumps. J. Fluids Engineering 133, 8, 081103–1–081103–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catania, A. E. and Ferrari, A. (2012). Development and performance assessment of the new-generation CFfuel injection system for diesel passenger cars. Applied Energy 91, 1, 483–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catania, A. E., Ferrari, A., Manno, M. and Spessa, E. (2008). Experimental investigation of dynamics effects on multiple-injection common rail system performance. J. Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power 130, 3, 032806–1–032806–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catania, A. E., Ferrari, A. and Spessa, E. (2009). Numericalexperimental study and solutions to reduce the dwelltime threshold for fusion-free consecutive injections in a multijet solenoid-type CRsystem. J. Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power 131, 2, 022804–1–022804–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catania, A. E. and Ferrari, A. (2009). Advanced mathematical modeling of electronic unit injector systems for heavy duty diesel engine application. SAE Int. J. Commercial Vehicles 1, 1, 134–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chien, K. L., Hrones, J. A. and Reswick, J. B. (1952). On the automatic control of generalized passive systems. Trans. American Society of Mechanical Engineeing, 74, 175–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, G. and Coon, G. (1953). Theoretical consideration of retarded control. Trans. ASME, 75, 827–834.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrari, A. and Mittica, A. (2012). FEM modeling of the piezoelectric driving system in the design of directacting diesel injectors. Applied Energy, 99, 471–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrari, A., Paolicelli, F. and Pizzo, P. (2015). Hydraulic performance comparison between the newly designed common feeding and standard common rail injection systems for diesel engines. J. Engineering for Gas Turbine and Power 138, 9, 092801–1–092801–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrari, A. and Pizzo, P. (2017). Fully predictive common rail fuel injection apparatus model and its application to global system dynamics analyses. Int. J. Engine 18, 3, 273–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrari, A. and Salvo, E. (2017). Determination of the transfer function between the injected flow-rate and high-pressure time histories for improved control of common rail diesel engines. Int. J. Engine Research 18, 3, 212–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrari, A. and Vitali, R. (2017). Instantaneous torque, energy saving and flow-rate ripple analysis of a Common Rail pump equipped with different delivery-pressure control systems. Int. J. Enegine Research, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1468087417740272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gu, J., Zhang, Y. and Gao, D. (2009). Application of nonlinear PID controller in main steam temperature control. Proc. IEEE Asia-Pacific Power and Energy Engineering Conf., Wuhan, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gude, J. J. and Kahoraho, E. (2012). Kappa-tau type PItuning rules for specified robust levels. IFAC Conf. Advances in PID Control, Brescia, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, V. K., Zhang, Z. and Sun, Z. (2011). Modeling and control of a novel pressure regulations mechanism for common rail fuel injection systems. Applied Mathematical Modelling 35, 7, 3473–3483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagen, J., Herrmann, O. E., Weber, J. and Queck, D. (2016). Diesel combustion potentials by further injector improvements. MTZ Worldwide 77, 4, 16–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambali, N., Masngut, A., Ishak, A. A. and Janin, Z. (2014). Process controllability for flow control system using Ziegler-Nichols (ZN), Cohen-Coon (CC) and Chien-Hrones-Reswick (CHR) tuning methods. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Smart Instrumentation, Measurement and Applications, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hua, H., Ma, N., Ma, J. and Huang, H. (2013). Design of rail pressure tracking controller for novel fuel injection system. J. Shanghai Jiaotong University 18, 3, 264–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonhard, R., Parche, M., Alvarez-Avila, C., Krauß, J. and Rosenau, B. (2009). Pressure-amplified common rail system for commercial vehicles. MTZ Worldwide 70, 5, 10–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsumoto, S., Yamada, K. and Date, K. (2012). Concepts and evolution of injector for common rail system. SAE Paper No. 2012–01–1753.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Matsumoto, S., Date, K., Taguchi, T. and Herrmann, O. E. (2013). The new denso common rail diesel solenoid injector. MTZ Worldwide 74, 2, 44–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meek, G., Williams, R., Thornton, D., Knapp, P. and Cosser, S. (2014). F2E–Ultra high pressure distributed pump common rail system. SAE Paper No. 2014–01–1440.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Merrit, H. E. (1967). Hydrualic Control Systems. John Wiley & Sons. Hoboken, New Jersey, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oh, B., Oh, S., Lee, L. and Sunwoo, M. (2007). Development of an injector driver for piezo actuated Common Rail injectors. SAE Paper No. 2007–01–3537.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shinohara, Y., Takeuchi, K., Herrmann, O. E. and Laum, H. J. (2011). 3000 bar common rail system. MTZ Worldwide 72, 1, 4–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao, W., Liang, F., Tan, W., Mao, X., Yang, L. and Zhuo, B. (2006). Analysis of common rail pressure build-up and assistant-establishment of engine phase position in starting process. SAE Paper No. 2006–01–3525.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler, J. G. and Nichols, N. B. (1942). Optimum settings for automatic controllers. Trans. ASME, 64, 759–768.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessandro Ferrari.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ferrari, A., Mittica, A., Pizzo, P. et al. PID Controller Modelling and Optimization in Cr Systems with Standard and Reduced Accumulators. Int.J Automot. Technol. 19, 771–781 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-018-0074-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-018-0074-4

Key words

Navigation