Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of fuel choice on nanoparticle emission factors in LPG-gasoline bi-fuel vehicles

  • Published:
International Journal of Automotive Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nanoparticle and gas-phase emission factors are presented for a liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) passenger vehicle and are compared to gasoline operation. A bi-fuel LPG-gasoline vehicle certified for use on either fuel was used as the test vehicle so that a direct comparison of the emissions could be made based on fuel choice. These values were considered along with previous studies to determine the relative change in particulate emissions due to fuel choice over a wide range of vehicles and operating conditions. The vehicle examined in this study was tested on a chassis dynamometer for both steadystate and transient conditions. Transient test cycles included the US FTP72 driving cycle, Japanese driving cycle and modified Indian driving cycle while steady-state tests were done at vehicle speeds ranging from 10–90 km/hr in various transmission gears. Exhaust particle size distributions were measured in real-time using a differential mobility spectrometer (DMS50), and particle number and particle mass emission factors were calculated. For both fuels, the majority of the particles ranged from 5 to 160 nm in terms of particle diameter, with typically more than 85% of the particles in the nucleation mode (between 5–50 nm). In most cases, the vehicle produced a greater fraction of larger (accumulation mode) particles when fuelled on LPG. Using the data in the literature as well as the data in the current study, gasoline fuel produces 4.6 times more particles in terms of number and 2.1 times more particles in terms of mass.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aakko, P. and Nylund, N. (2003). Particle emissions at moderate and cold temperatures using different fuels. SAE Paper No. 2003-01-3285.

  • Agostinelli, D., Carter, N., Fang, G. and Hamori, F. (2011). Optimization of a mono-fuel liquid phase LPG MPI fuel system. SAE Paper No. 2011-01-0382.

  • Andersson, J. D., Wedekind, B. G. A., Hall, D., Stradling, R. and Wilson, G. (2001). DETR/ SMMT/ CONCAWE particulate research programme: Light duty results. SAE Paper No. 2001-01-3577.

  • Andersson, J., Giechaskiel, B., Muñoz-Bueno, R., Sandbach, E. and Dilara, P. (2007). Particle measurement programme (PMP) light-duty inter-laboratory correlation exercise (ILCE_LD)-Final report. (EUR 22775 EN) GRPE-54-08-Rev.1.

  • Balasubramanian, S. K., Jittiwat, J., Manikandan, J., Ong, C. N., Yu, L. E. and Ong, W. Y. (2010). Biodistribution of gold nanoparticles and gene expression changes in the liver and spleen after intravenous administration in rats. Biomaterials, 31, 2034–2042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhale, P. V., Ardhapurkar, P. M. and Deshpande, N. V. (2005). Experimental investigations to study the comparative effect of LPG and gasoline on performance and emissions of SI engine. Proc. ASME Internal Combustion Engine Division, ICES 2005-1065.

  • Brown, J. S., Zeman, K. L. and Bennett, W. D. (2002). Ultrafine particle deposition and clearance in the healthy and obstructed lung. American J. Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 166, 1240–1247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chase, R. E., Duszkiewicz, G. J., Richert, J. F. O., Lewis, D., Maricq, M. M. and Xu, N. (2004). PM measurement artifact: Organic vapor deposition on different filter media. SAE Paper No. 2004-01-0967.

  • Forster, P., Ramaswamy, V., Artaxo, P., Berntsen, T., Betts, R., Fahey, D., Haywood, J., Lean, J., Lowe, D., Myhre, G., Nganga, J., Prinn, R., Raga, G., Schulz, M. and Dorland, R. V. (2007). Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giechaskiel, B., Carriero, M., Martini, G. and Andersson, J. (2009). Heavy duty particle measurement programme (PMP): Exploratory work for the definition of the test protocol. SAE Int. J. Engines 2,1, 1528–1546.

    Google Scholar 

  • IEA (2010). Advanced Motor Fuels Annual Report 2010. International Energy Agency.

  • Khalek, I. (2007). Sampling system for solid and volatile exhaust particle size, number, and mass emissions. SAE Paper No. 2007-01-0307.

  • Khalek, I., Bougher, T. and Jetter, J. (2010). Particle emissions from a 2009 gasoline direct injection engine using different commercially available fuels. SAE Int. J. Fuels and Lubricants 3,2, 623–637.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kittelson, D. B. (1998). Engines and nanoparticles: A review. J. Aerosol Science, 29, 575–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai, C. H., Chang, C. C., Wang, C. H., Shao, M., Zhang, Y. and Wang, J. L. (2009). Emissions of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) from motor vehicles. Atmospheric Environment, 43, 1456–1463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. W., Do, H. S., Kweon, S. I., Park, K. K. and Hong, J. H. (2010). Effect of various LPG supply systems on exhaust particle emission in spark-ignited combustion engine. Int. J. Automotive Technology 11,6, 793–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maricq, M. M. and Xu, N. (2004). The effective density and fractal dimension of soot particles from premixed flames and motor vehicle exhaust. J. Aerosol Science, 35, 1251–1274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merkisz, J., Pielecha, J. and Gis, W. (2009). Gasoline and LPG vehicle emission factors in a road test. SAE Paper No. 2009-01-0937.

  • Montajir, R., Kusaka, T., Bamba, Y. and Adachi, M. (2005). A new concept for real-time measurement of particulate matter (soot and SOF). SAE Paper No. 2005-01-3605.

  • Myung, C. L., Lee, H., Choi, K., Lee, Y. J. and Park, S. (2009). Effects of gasoline, diesel, LPG, and low-carbon fuels and various certification modes on nanoparticle emission characteristics in light-duty vehicles. Int. J. Automotive Technology 10,5, 537544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myung, C. L. and Park, S. (2012). Exhaust nanoparticle emissions from internal combustion engines: A review. Int. J. Automotive Technology 13,1, 922.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Official Journal of the European Union (2008). Commission Regulation (EC) No. 692/2008. Official J. European Union.

  • Olfert, J. S. and Collings, N. (2005). New method for particle mass classication—the Couette centrifugal particle mass analyzer. J. Aerosol Science, 36, 1338–1352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olfert, J. S., Symonds, J. P. R. and Collings, N. (2007). The effective density and fractal dimension of particles emitted from a light-duty diesel vehicle with a diesel oxidation catalyst. J. Aerosol Science, 38, 69–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, K., Kittelson, D. B. and McMurry, P. H. (2003). A closure study of aerosol mass concentration measurements: Comparison of values obtained with filters and by direct measurements of mass distributions. Atmospheric Environment, 37, 1223–1230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reavell, K., Hands, T. and Collings, N. (2002). A fast response particulate spectrometer for combustion aerosols. SAE Paper No. 2002-01-2714.

  • Ristovski, Z. D., Morawska, L., Bofinger, N. D. and Hitchins, J. (1998). Submicrometer and supermicrometer particulate emission from spark ignition vehicles. Environmental Science and Technology 32,24, 3845–3852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ristovski, Z. D., Jayaratne, E. R., Morawska, L., Ayoko, G. A. and Lim, M. (2005). Particle and carbon dioxide emissions from passenger vehicles operating on unleaded petrol and LPG fuel. Science of the Total Environment, 345, 93–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singhal, S. K., Kamel, W., Jain, A. K. and Garg, M. O. (2011). Alternative transport fuels: An indian perspective. Hydrocarbon Processing, 69–72.

  • State of California Air Resource Board (2010). Preliminary Discussion Paper, Proposed Amendments to California’s Low-emission Vehicle Regulation. Particle Matter Mass, Ultrafine Solid Particle Number and Black Carbon Emissions. State of California Air Resource Board.

  • Symonds, J. P. R., Reavell, K. St. J., Olfert, J. S., Campbell, B. W. and Swift, S. J. (2007). Diesel soot mass calculation in real-time with a differential mobility spectrometer. J. Aerosol Science, 38, 52–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Symonds, J. P. R., Rushton, M. G., Reavell, K. St. J., Lowndes, C., Ellison, A. E. and Olfert, J. S. (2011). Evaluation of the high resolution centrifugal particle mass analyser. European Aerosol Conf., Manchester.

  • Van de Weijer, C. J. T. (1997). Heavy Duty Emission Factors-Development of Representative Driving Cycles and Predictions of Emissions in Real-life. Dissertation. Technischen Universität Graz.

  • Yang, H., Chien, S., Cheng, M., Peng, C. and Park, S. (2007). Comparative study of regulated and unregulated air pollutant emissions before and after conversion of automobiles from gasoline power to liquefied petroleum gas/gasoline dual-fuel retrofits. Environmental Science and Technology, 41, 8471–8476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. S. Olfert.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Momenimovahed, A., Olfert, J.S., Checkel, M.D. et al. Effect of fuel choice on nanoparticle emission factors in LPG-gasoline bi-fuel vehicles. Int.J Automot. Technol. 14, 1–11 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-013-0001-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-013-0001-7

Key Words

Navigation