Skip to main content
Log in

Exploring the Effects of Shoreline Development on Fringing Salt Marshes Using Nekton, Benthic Invertebrate, and Vegetation Metrics

  • Published:
Estuaries and Coasts Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fringing marshes are important but often overlooked components of estuarine systems. Due to their relatively small size and large edge to area ratio, they are particularly vulnerable to impacts from adjacent upland development. Because current shoreland zoning policies aim to limit activities in upland buffer zones directly next to coastal habitats, we tested for relationships between the extent of development in a 100-m buffer adjacent to fringing salt marshes and the structure of marsh plants, benthic invertebrates, and nekton communities. We also wanted to determine useful metrics for monitoring fringing marshes that are exposed to shoreline development. We sampled 18 fringing salt marshes in two estuaries along the coast of southern Maine. The percent of shoreline developed in 100-m buffers around each site ranged from 0 to 91 %. Several variables correlated with the percent of shoreline developed, including one plant diversity metric (Evenness), two nekton metrics (Fundulus heteroclitus %biomass and Carcinus maenas %biomass), and several benthic invertebrate metrics (nematode and insect/dipteran larvae densities in the high marsh zone) (p < 0.05). Carcinus maenas, a recent invader to the area, comprised 30–97 % of the nekton biomass collected at the 18 sites and was inversely correlated with Fundulus %biomass. None of these biotic metrics correlated with the other abiotic marsh attributes we measured, including porewater salinity, marsh site width, and distance of the site to the mouth of the river. In all, between 25 and 48 % of the variance in the individual metrics we identified was accounted for by the extent of development in the 100-m buffer zone. Results from this study add to our understanding of fringing salt marshes and the impacts of shoreline development to these habitats and point to metrics that may be useful in monitoring these impacts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bertness, M.D., P.J. Ewanchuk, and B.R. Silliman. 2002. Anthropogenic modification of New England salt marsh landscapes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99(3): 1395–1398.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bilkovic, D.M., and M.M. Roggero. 2008. Effects of coastal development on nearshore estuarine nekton communities. Marine Ecology Progress Series 358: 27–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Currin, C.A., P.C. Delano, and L.M. Valdes-Weaver. 2008. Utilization of a citizen monitoring protocol to assess the structure and function of natural and stabilized fringing salt marshes in North Carolina. Wetlands Ecology and Management 16: 97–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dauer, D.M. 1993. Biological criteria, environmental health and estuarine macrobenthic community structure. Marine Pollution Bulletin 26: 249–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J.L., B. Nowicki, and C. Wigand. 2004. Denitrification in fringing salt marshes of Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island, USA. Wetlands 24(4): 870–878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Decker, C.J., and J.W. Fleeger. 1984. The effect of crude oil on the colonization of meiofauna into salt marsh sediments. Hydrobiologia 118(1): 49–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deegan, L.A., J.T. Finn, S.G. Ayvazian, C.A. Ryder-Kieffer, and J. Buonaccorsi. 1997. Development and validation of an estuarine biotic integrity index. Estuaries 20(3): 601–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deegan, L.A., J.E. Hughes, and R.A. Rountree. 2000. Salt marsh ecosystem support of marine transient species. In Concepts and controversies in tidal marsh ecology, ed. M.P. Weinstein and D.A. Kreeger, 333–368. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dernie, K.M., M.J. Kaiser, E.A. Richardson, and R.M. Warwick. 2003. Recovery of soft sediment communities and habitats following physical disturbance. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 285–286: 414–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dionne, M., F. Short, and D. Burdick. 1999. Fish utilization of restored, created and reference salt marsh habitat in the Gulf of Maine. American Fisheries Society Symposium 22: 285–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doan, M. 2005. Concentrations of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in surficial sediments of the Fore River and Portland Harbor, Maine. A Report to the Natural Resource Damage Trustees, Agreement No. 604195. http://www.cascobay.usm.maine.edu/pdfs/concentrations_of_pahs_in_fore_river.pdf. Accessed 25 Jun 2014.

  • Eberhardt, A.L., D.M. Burdick, and M. Dionne. 2011. The effects of road culverts on nekton in New England salt marshes: Implications for tidal restoration. Restoration Ecology 19(6): 776–785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewenchuck, P.J., and M.D. Bertness. 2004. Structure and organization of a northern New England salt marsh plant community. Journal of Ecology 92: 72–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gedan, K.B., B.R. Silliman, and M.D. Bertness. 2009. Centuries of human-driven change in salt marsh ecosystems. Annual Review of Marine Science 1: 117–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Google Earth 6.1.5001. 2011. http://www.google.com/earth/index.html. Accessed 12 Sep 2012.

  • Haines, E.B., and C.L. Montague. 1979. Food sources of estuarine invertebrates analyzed using 13C/12C ratios. Ecology 60(1): 48–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J.F., R.E. Anderson, R.L. Tatham, and W.C. Black. 1998. Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale, S.S., J.F. Paul, and J.F. Heltshe. 2004. Watershed landscape indicators of estuarine benthic condition. Estuaries 27(2): 283–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hampson, G.R., and E.T. Moul. 1978. No. 2 fuel oil spill in Bourne, Massachusetts: Immediate assessment of the effects on marine invertebrates and a 3-year study of growth and recovery of a salt marsh. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 35: 731–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiscock, K., O. Langmead, and R. Warwick. 2004. Identification of seabed indicator species from time-series and other studies to support implementation of the EU Habitats and Water Framework Directives. Report to the Joint Nature Conservation Committee and the Environment Agency from the Marine Biological Association. Plymouth: Marine Biological Association. JNCC Contract F90-01-705. 109 pp.

  • Hughes, J.E., L. Deegan, M. Weaver, and J. Costa. 2002. Regional application of an index of estuarine biotic integrity based on fish communities. Estuaries 25(2): 250–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IBM CorpReleased. 2011. IBM SPSS statistics for windows, version 20.0. Armonk: IBM Corp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kneib, R.T. 1997. The role of tidal marshes in the ecology of estuarine nekton. Oceanography and Marine Biology: An Annual Review 35: 163–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kneib, R.T., and A.E. Stiven. 1978. Growth, reproduction, and feeding of Fundulus heteroclitus (L.) on a North Carolina salt marsh. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 31: 121–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kneib, R.T., and S.L. Wagner. 1994. Nekton use of vegetated marsh habitats at different stages of tidal inundation. Marine Ecology Progress Series 106: 227–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kneib, R.T., A.E. Stiven, and E.B. Haines. 1980. Stable carbon isotope ratios in Fundulus heteroclitus (L.) muscle tissue and gut contents from a North Carolina Spartina marsh. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 46: 89–98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • La-Salle, M.W., and T.D. Bishop. 1987. Seasonal abundance of aquatic Diptera in two oligohaline tidal marshes in Mississippi. Estuaries 10: 303–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levell, D., D. Rostron, and I.M.T. Dixon. 1989. Sediment macrobenthic communities from oil ports to offshore oilfields. In Ecological impacts of the oil industry, ed. B. Dicks, 97–134. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, R.A., and M. Dionne. 2008. Habitat heterogeneity: The importance of salt marsh pools and high marsh surfaces to fish production in two Gulf of Maine salt marshes. Marine Ecology Progress Series 368: 217–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magurran, A.C. 1988. Ecological diversity and its measurement, 192. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Massachusetts Geographic Information System. 2002. Land Use Data Layer. http://www.mass.gov/mgis/lus.htm. Accessed 1 Mar 2006.

  • McElroy, M., and K. Babbitt. 2005. Species profile: Salt marsh sharp tailed sparrow (Ammodramuscaudacutus). In: New Hampshire Wildlife Action Plan.Concord, NH: New Hampshire Fish and Game Department. http://www.wildlife.state.nh.us/Wildlife/Wildlife_Plan/WAP_species_PDFs/Birds/SaltMarshSharpT.pdf. Accessed 23 June 2014.

  • Merritt, R.W., K.W. Cummins, and V.H. Resh. 1984. Collecting, sampling, and rearing methods for aquatic insects. In An introduction to the aquatic insects of North America, ed. R.W. Merritt and K.W. Cummins, 11–26. Dubuque: Kendall/Hunt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, P.A., D.B. Burdick, and F.T. Short. 2009. The functions and values of fringing salt marshes in northern New England, U.S.A. Estuaries and Coasts 32(3): 483–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, T.H., and R. Rosenberg. 1978. Macrobenthic succession in relation to organic enrichment and pollution of the marine environment. Oceanography and Marine Biology: An Annual Review 16: 229–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roman C.T., M.-J. James-Pirri, and J.F.Heltshe. 2001. Monitoring salt marsh vegetation. Wellfleet, MA: Cape Cod National Seashore. http://www.nature.nps.gov/im/monitor/protocoldb.cfm. 23 June 2014.

  • SAS Version 9.2. Released 2008. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.

  • Silliman, B.R., and M.D. Bertness. 2004. Shoreline development drives invasion of Phragmites australis and the loss of plant diversity on New England salt marshes. Conservation Biology 18(5): 1424–1434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobias, C.R., I.C. Anderson, E.A. Canuel, and S.A. Macko. 2001. Nitrogen cycling through a fringing marsh-aquifer ecotone. Marine Ecology Progress Series 210: 25–39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, A.M., and J.C. Trexler. 1997. Sampling aquatic invertebrates from marshes: Evaluating the options. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 16(3): 694–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valiela, I., and J.M. Teal. 1974. Nutrient limitation in salt marsh vegetation. In Ecology of halophytes, ed. R.J. Reimold and W.H. Queen, 563–574. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisberg, S.B., and V.A. Lotrich. 1982. The importance of an infrequently flooded intertidal marsh surface as an energy source for the mummichog Fundulus heteroclitus: An experimental approach. Marine Biology 66: 307–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wigand, C., R. Comeleo, R. McKinney, G. Thursby, M. Chintala, and M. Charpentier. 2001. Outline of a new approach to evaluate ecological integrity of salt marshes. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 7(5): 1541–1554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wigand, C., R.A. Mckinney, M.A. Charpentier, M.M. Chintala, and G.B. Thursby. 2003. Relationships of nitrogen loadings, residential development, and physical characteristics with plant structure in New England salt marshes. Estuaries 26(6): 1494–1504.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Thank you to Lucas Curci and Cayce Dalton for assistance with data analysis and GIS and to numerous University of New England undergraduate students for field and lab assistance. Thank you also to Woonyuen Kohn and Amita Mittral for assistance with statistical analyses. The manuscript was greatly improved by the suggestions of two anonymous reviewers. Funding for this research was provided by the US Environmental Protection Agency and the Maine Department of Environmental Protection.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pamela A. Morgan.

Additional information

Communicated by Iris C. Anderson

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Morgan, P.A., Dionne, M., MacKenzie, R. et al. Exploring the Effects of Shoreline Development on Fringing Salt Marshes Using Nekton, Benthic Invertebrate, and Vegetation Metrics. Estuaries and Coasts 38, 1274–1287 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-015-9947-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-015-9947-1

Keywords

Navigation