Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Technical Note: The Use of Laser Diffraction Particle Size Analyzers for Inference on Infauna-Sediment Relationships

  • Published:
Estuaries and Coasts Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For over a century, ecologists and evolutionary biologists have investigated the association between sedimentary characteristics and the infaunal communities inhabiting sediments. Relationships between infauna and, specifically, sediment grain size distributions, have provided a common methodology to predict the distributions, composition, and diversity of soft-sediment communities. Wet/dry sieve methods have traditionally been used to determine grain size distributions, but laser particle size analyzers are becoming increasingly popular and have been shown to measure sediment grain size distributions more efficiently and more accurately than wet/dry sieve methods. An additional, but underexplored, advantage of laser particle size analyzers is their ability to provide uncommonly reported or alternative grain size statistics that can be used to estimate sediment characteristics that are not easily measured using sieve techniques. In particular, measures of sediment heterogeneity are arbitrary and tedious to measure with previously used sieve and microscope techniques. Here, we propose that grain size coefficient of variation, measured using a particle size analyzer, is an improved metric for sediment heterogeneity. We show that grain size coefficient of variation is related to infaunal richness in intertidal habitats along the northern Gulf of Mexico matching previous results relating sediment heterogeneity to infaunal richness. We discuss the benefits and drawbacks of particle size analyzers and how the use of alternative metrics from laser particle size analyzers may assist the field of benthic ecology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

References

  • Anderson, M.J. 2008. Animal-sediment relationships re-visited: Characterising species distributions along an environmental gradient using canonical analysis and quantile regression splines. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 366: 16–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellingsen, K.E. 2002. Soft-sediment benthic biodiversity on the continental shelf in relation to environmental variability. Marine Ecology Progress Series 232: 15–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eshel, G., G.J. Levy, U. Mingelgrin, and M.J. Singer. 2004. Critical evaluation of the use of laser diffraction for particle-size distribution analysis. Soil Science Society of America Journal 68: 736–743.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Etter, R.J., and J.F. Grassle. 1992. Patterns of species diversity in the deep sea as a function of sediment particle size diversity. Nature 36: 576–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folk, R.L. 1974. Petrology of sedimentary rocks. Austin: Hephill Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forde, J., P.C. Collins, A. Patterson, and R. Kennedy. 2012. Comparison of granulometric methods and sampling strategies used in marine habitat classification and ecological status assessment. Marine Pollution Bulletin 64: 1018–1028.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J.S. 1974. Animal-sediment relationships. Oceanography and Marine Biology—An Annual Review 12: 223–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guieb, R.A., P.A. Jumars, and R.F.L. Self. 2004. Adhesive-based selection by a tentacle-feeding polychaete for particle size, shape and bacterial coating in silt and sand. Journal of Marine Research 62: 261–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team. 2012. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.

  • Rodriguez, J.G., and A. Uriarte. 2009. Laser-diffraction and dry-sieving grain size analyses undertaken on fine- and medium-grained sandy marine sediments: A Note. Journal of Coastal Research 25: 257–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snelgrove, P.V.R., and C.A. Butman. 1994. Animal sediment relationships revisited—Cause versus effect. Oceanography and Marine Biology – An Annual Review 32: 111–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamhuis, E.J., J.J. Videler, and P.A.W.J. de Wilde. 1998. Optimal foraging in the thalassinidean shrimp Calianassa subterranea: Improving food quality by grain size selection. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 228: 197–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitlatch, R.B. 1981. Animal-sediment relationships in intertidal matine benthic habitats: Some determinants of deposit-feeding species diversity. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 53: 31–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitlatch, R.B., and S. Obrebski. 1980. Feeding selectivity and coexistence in 2 deposit-feeding gastropods. Marine Biology 58: 219–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Alex Kolker for use of his laboratory to analyze sediment granulometrics, Alex Ameen for assistance in sediment analysis, Kelly Platt and Sarah Romeo for assistance in sorting invertebrates, other members of CazLab (caz.tulane.edu) for helpful discussion, and Alf Norkko and two anonymous reviewers whose suggestions improved this manuscript. Funding for this study was provided by the National Science Foundation (Award DEB-1060350, PIs Taylor and Sherry), an NSF REU Supplement (DEB 1112670), a Louisiana Seagrant Undergraduate Research Opportunities Program award, and a Tulane Center for Engaged Learning and Teaching award (PIs Coblentz and Taylor).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kyle E. Coblentz.

Additional information

Communicated by Alf Norkko

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Coblentz, K.E., Henkel, J.R., Sigel, B.J. et al. Technical Note: The Use of Laser Diffraction Particle Size Analyzers for Inference on Infauna-Sediment Relationships. Estuaries and Coasts 38, 699–702 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-014-9837-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-014-9837-y

Keywords

Navigation