Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Understanding and Informing Permitting Decisions for Tidal Energy Development Using an Adaptive Management Framework

  • Published:
Estuaries and Coasts Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Marine hydrokinetic (MHK) energy offers a promising new source of renewable ocean energy. However, the young industry is faced with significant challenges. Most notable is the challenge of regulatory uncertainty that is thought to hamper the successful deployment of new tidal energy technologies. Adaptive management may be one approach to deal with uncertainty and inform permitting decisions for hydrokinetic projects. In this study, we apply the concept of adaptive management to the Cobscook Bay Tidal Energy Project in Maine to better understand and inform permitting decisions. Using a social science approach of observation, interviews, and document analysis, we examine (1) agency roles and authority, (2) agency interactions, (3) regulatory change, and (4) challenges faced in the regulatory and permitting process for MHK development at the federal and state level. We found four institutional factors favorable to an adaptive approach. These include experimentation and learning, institutionalized choice to correct avoidable error, a strong commitment to interagency coordination, and an emphasis on early proactive engagement with project developers. We also identified institutional challenges or vulnerabilities. These include conflicting agency cultures, high financial costs, and long timeframes associated with baseline data collection. Lessons learned from this study can assist regulators, policymakers, and project developers design and implement an actively adaptive management approach that can move new renewable ocean energy development forward in a way that is socially acceptable and environmentally responsible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, F., G. Achterman, S. Padula, and M. Harte. 2007. A programmatic approach to wave energy planning: Opportunities for the Oregon Wave Energy Trust. Proceedings of Coastal Zone 07 Portland Oregon (July 22–26, 2007).

  • Bedard, R., M. Previsic, G. Hagerman, B. Polagye, W. Musial, J. Klure, A. von Jouanne, U. Mathur, C. Collar, C. Hopper, and S. Amsden. 2007. North American ocean energy status- March 2007. Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) Tidal Power (TP); Volume 8, 2007.

  • Boehlert, G.W., and A.B. Gill. 2010. Environmental and ecological effects of ocean renewable energy development: a current synthesis. Oceanography 23(2): 68–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornholdt, M. 2012. Ocean renewable energy from a national perspective. Danvers, MA: Energy Ocean Conference 2012. June 19–21, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, D.A. 2004. Modeling tidal circulation and exchange in Cobscook Bay, Maine. Northeastern Naturalist 11(2): 23–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cada, G., J. Ahlgrimm, M. Bahleda, T. Bigford, S.D. Stavrakas, D. Hall, R. Moursund, and M. Sale. 2007. Potential impacts of hydrokinetic and wave energy conversion technologies on aquatic environments. Fisheries 32: 174–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cada, G.F., A.E. Copping, and J. Roberts. 2012. Ocean/tidal/stream power: Identifying how marine and hydrokinetic devices affect aquatic environments. Hyrdoworld.com [Accessed June 10, 2012].

  • Campbell, H.V. 2009/2010. A rising tide: Wave energy in the United States and Scotland. Sea Grant Law and Policy Journal 2(2): 29–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • EPRI. 2005. Ocean tidal and wave energy, renewable energy technical assessment guide—TAG-RE (2005). Palo Alto, CA: Electric Power Research Institute. 2005. 1010489.

    Google Scholar 

  • FERC. 2008. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Licensing Hydrokinetic Pilot Projects http://www.ferc.gov/industries/hydropower/geninfo/licensing/hydrokinetics/pdf/white_paper.pdf (issued April 14, 2008.

  • FERC. 2012. Ocean Renewable Power Company: Order issuing pilot project license Minor Project), Cobscook Bay Tidal Energy Project Project No. 12711–005 (February 27, 2012).

  • Glaser, B.G., and A.L. Strauss. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goundar, J.N., and M.R. Ahmed. 2013. Design of a horizontal axis tidal current turbine. Applied Energy 111: 161–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griset, T.J. 2010. Harnessing the ocean's power: opportunities in renewable ocean energy resources. Ocean and Coastal Law Journal 16(2): 151–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson, L. 1999. Resilience, flexibility, adaptive management – antidotes for spurious certitude? Conservation Ecology 3(1): 7. [online] URL: http://www.consecol.org/vol3/iis1/art7.

  • Halbert, C.L. 1993. How adaptive is adaptive management? Implementing adaptive management in Washington State and British Columbia. Reviews in Fisheries Science 1(3): 261–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C.S. 1978. Adaptive environmental assessment and management. London, UK: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, M.Z., and C.L. Archer. 2012. Saturation wind power potential and its implications for wind energy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109(39): 15679–15684.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, B.L. 1999. Introduction to the special feature: Adaptive management – scientifically sound, socially challenged? Conservation Ecology 3(1): 10. [online] URL: http://www.conecol.org/vol3/iis1/art10/.

  • Konnert, T. 2010. The role of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission in authorizing hydrokinetic technology projects. Oceanography 23(2): 54–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leary, D., and M. Esteban. 2009. Climate change and renewable energy from the ocean and tides: calming the sea of regulatory uncertainty. The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 24: 617–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K.N. 1993. Compass and gyroscope: integrating science and politics for the environment. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marvel, K., B. Kravitz, and K. Caldeira. 2013. Geophysical limits to global wind power. Nature Climate Change 3: 118–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, S.B. 2009. Qualitative research: a guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ocean Energy Task Force (OETF). 2009. Final report of the Ocean Energy Task Force to Governor John E. Baldacci. Augusta, Maine. www.maine.gov/spo/specialprojects/OETF/Documents/finalreport_123109.pdf [Accessed May 24, 2012].

  • Oram, C., and C. Marriott. 2010. Using adaptive management to resolve uncertainties for wave and tidal energy projects. Oceanography 23(2): 92–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelc, R., and R.M. Fujita. 2002. Renewable energy from the ocean. Marine Policy 26: 471–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A.C., and J.M. Corbin. 1990. Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Federal Regulatory Commission and State of Maine. 2009 Memorandum of Understanding (August 2009), http://www.ferc.gov/legal/maj-ord-reg/mou/mou-ma.pdf.

  • Viehman, H., G.B. Zydlewski. 2012b. Fish interactions with a commercial-scale tidal energy device in the natural environment. Estuaries and Coasts. (THIS ISSUE).

  • Viehman, H., G.B. Zydlewski, J.D. McCleave, G. Staines. 2012a. Using acoustics to understand fish presence and vertical distribution in a tidally dynamic region targeted for energy extraction. Estuaries and Coasts. (THIS ISSUE).

  • Walters, C.J. 1986. Adaptive management of renewable resources. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, C.J., and C.S. Holling. 1990. Large-scale management experiments and learning by doing. Ecology 71(6): 2060–2068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wellinghoff, J., J. Pederson, and D.L. Morenoff. 2008. Facilitating hydrokinetic energy development through regulatory innovation. Energy Law Journal 29: 397–42.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the National Science Foundation award EPS-0904155 to Maine EPSCoR Sustainability Solutions Initiative at the University of Maine. The authors would like to thank the biologists, regulators, and developers for generously sharing their time and perspectives on the process of tidal energy development.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sustainability Solutions Initiative, University of Maine, 5710 Norman Smith Hall, Orono, ME, 04469, USA

    Jessica S. Jansujwicz

  2. School for Marine Sciences, University of Maine, 200 Libby Hall, Orono, ME, 04469, USA

    Teresa R. Johnson

Authors
  1. Jessica S. Jansujwicz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Teresa R. Johnson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jessica S. Jansujwicz.

Additional information

Editorial responsibility: Andrea Copping

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jansujwicz, J.S., Johnson, T.R. Understanding and Informing Permitting Decisions for Tidal Energy Development Using an Adaptive Management Framework. Estuaries and Coasts 38 (Suppl 1), 253–265 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-013-9678-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-013-9678-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation