Abstract
This paper aims to interpret and characterize the inflorescence of Koyamaeae tribe from the typological point of view in order to establish homologies and promote comparative studies and the use of inflorescence characters in future phylogenetic studies. The Koyamaeae tribe is comprised of one monotypic Koyamaea W. Thomas & Davidse genus, with K. neblinensis W. Thomas & Davidse. Koyamaea neblinensis has a synflorescence type II and/or type III made up by a many-noded culm, covered by sheaths, usually unbranched (synflorescence type II), but occasionally with 1–2 branches from the upper half (synflorescence type III). The inflorescence of Koyamaea shows a main axis leading to a terminal spikelet (main florescence) and a primary branch (primary paraclade) arising from the axillary bud of the single involucral bract. Accordingly, the inflorescence is composed of the main florescence and a highly reduced paracladial zone. This paracladial zone is reduced to one node where a single primary paraclade is inserted. This primary paraclade consists of a short hypopodium, a prophyll, an epipodium and a terminal spikelet (or coflorescence). The axillary bud of the prophyll develops a secondary branch (secondary paraclade) with a similar structure to that of the primary paraclade. All subsequent higher-order branches also arise in the axils of prophylls. Inflorescence characters of this tribe are discussed in relation to related tribes Sclerieae, Bisboeckelereae, Cryptangieae and Trilepideae (sensu Goetghebeur, 1998).
Literature Cited
Ahumada, O. 2006. Las especies argentinas y paraguayas de Scleria (Cyperaceae): Estudio taxonómico y tipología de la sinflorescencia. Tesis doctoral. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Argentina. pp 431
——— & A. C. Vegetti. 2009. Inflorescence structure in species of Scleria subgenus Hypoporum and subgenus Scleria (Sclerieae-Cyperaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 281: 115–135.
Blaser, H. W. 1944. Studies in the morphology of the Cyperaceae II. The prophyll. American Journal of Botany 31: 53–64.
Bruhl, J. J. 1995. Sedge genera of the world: relationships and a new classification of the Cyperaceae. Australian Systematic Botany 8: 125–305.
Davidse, G. & R. Kral. 1988. Two new species of Calytrocarya (Cyperaceae: Sclerieae) from Venezuela and observations on the inflorescence morphology of the genus. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 75: 853–861.
Goetghebeur P. 1998. Cyperaceae. In: Kubitzki K., Huber H., Rudall P.J., Stevens P. S., Stützel T. (eds). The families and genera of vascular plants, vol 4, Springer Berlin, pp 141–190.
Guaglianone, E. R. 1970. Un nuevo carácter, útil en la distinción genérica entre Fimbrystilis Vahl y Bulbostylis Kunth (Cyperaceae). Darwiniana 16: 40–48.
——— 1980. Contribución al estudio del género Rhynchospora Vahl (Cyperaceae) II. Darwiniana 22: 449–509.
——— 1981. Contribución al estudio del género Rhynchospora Vahl (Cyperaceae) III. Darwiniana 23: 489–506.
——— 1982. Contribución al estudio del género Rhynchospora Vahl (Cyperaceae) IV. Rhynchospora iberae nueva especie de América Austral. Darwiniana 24: 469–473.
Guarise, N. J. & A. C. Vegetti. 2007. The Inflorescences structure of Cyperus L. section Luzuloidei Kunth (Cyperaceae). Plant Systematic and Evolution 271: 41–63.
Haines, R. W. 1966. Prophylls and branching in Cyperaceae. Journal of the East Africa Natural History Society XXVI 113: 51–78.
Kukkonen, I. 1986. Special features of the inflorescence structure in the family Cyperaceae. Annales Botanici Fennici 23: 107–119.
Lucero, L. E. & A. C. Vegetti. 2012. Inflorescence structure in Rhynchospora Vahl (Cyperaceae). Flora 207: 47–56.
Meert, M. & P. Goetghebeur. 1979. Comparative floral morphology of Bisboeckelereae and Cariceae (Cyperaceae) on the basis of the anthoid concept. Bulletin de la Societe Royale Botanique de Belgique 112: 128–143.
Muasya, A. M., D. A. Simpson, G. A. Verboom, P. Goetghebeur, R. F. Naczi, M. W. Chase & E. Smets. 2009. Phylogeny of Cyperaceae Based on DNA Sequence Data: Current Progress and Future Prospects. Botanical Review 75: 2–21.
Reutemann, A. G., N. J. Guarise, M. G. López & A. C. Vegetti. 2009. Structure of inflorescences of selected South American species of Abildgaardia Vahl, Bulbostylis Kunth and Fimbristylis Vahl (Abildgaardieae-Cyperoideae-Cyperaceae). Plant Systematic and Evolution 283: 93–110.
———, ———, ———, ———, L. Lucero, N. Guarise & A. C. Vegetti. 2012. Structure of the Cyperaceae Inflorescence. Botanical Review 78: 184–204.
Rua, G. 1999. Inflorescencias. Bases teóricas para su análisis. Sociedad Argentina de Botánica, Buenos Aires. 100.
Thomas, W. W. & G. Davidse. 1989. Koyamaea neblinensis, a new genus and species of Cyperaceae (Sclerioideae) from Cerro de la Neblina, Venezuela and Brazil. Systematic Botany 14: 189–196.
Troll, W. 1964. Die Infloreszenzen, Typologie und Stellung im Aufbau des Vegetationskörpers 1. Gustav Fischer, Jena.
Vegetti, A. 1992. Typology of the inflorescence in species Schoenoplectus (Cyperaceae) in Austral America. Beiträge zur Biologie der Pflanzen 67: 241–249.
——— 2003. Sinflorescence typology in Cyperaceae. Annales Botanici Fennici 40: 35–46.
——— & J. C. Tivano. 1991. Typology of sinflorescence in Schoenoplectus californicus (Cyperaceae). Beiträge zur Biologie der Pflanzen 66: 323–345.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dellaferrera, I., Vegetti, A.C. Inflorescence Structure in Koyamaeae and its Relationship with Sclerieae, Bisboeckelereae, Cryptagieae and Trilepideae Tribes (Cyperoideae-Cyperaceae). Bot. Rev. 81, 179–188 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12229-015-9154-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12229-015-9154-6