Skip to main content
Log in

A reappraisal of Barnebydendron (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae: Detarieae)

  • Published:
Kew Bulletin Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Barnebydendron J. H. Kirkbr. (LeguminosaeCaesalpinioideae – Detarieae), when first described under the name Phyllocarpus Riedel ex Tul. (1843), was considered to be a monospecific genus restricted to the Atlantic forest in the vicinity of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. A later collection from Guatemala in 1908 expanded the genus to two species. Many collections have been made since then in other parts of Central and South America and the distribution of the genus merits close examination. Recent publications have not provided full descriptions or illustrations, or cited specimens seen. A reappraisal of the genus is presented here and the monospecific status of the genus is confirmed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Map 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arroyo, M. T. K. (1981). Breeding Systems and Pollination Biology in Leguminosae. In: R. M. Polhill, & P. H. Raven (eds.), Advances in Legume Systematics, Part 2. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barneby, R. C. (1996). Neotropical Fabales at NY: asides and oversights. Phyllocarpus Riedel ex Endlicher, a monotypic genus. Brittonia, 48(2): 183 – 186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donnell Smith, J. (1913). Undescribed plants from Guatemala and other Central American republics 36. Bot. Gaz. 55(6): 433 – 434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endlicher, S. L. (1842). Genera Plantarum. Mantissa botanica sistens generum plantarum supplementum secundum. Vienna.

  • Fougère-Danezan, M., Maumont, S. & Bruneau, A. (2003). Phylogenetic relationships in resin-producing Detarieae inferred from molecular data and preliminary results for a biogeographic hypothesis. In: B. B. Klitgaard & A. Bruneau (eds.), Advances in Legume Systematics, Part 10, higher level systematics. pp. 161–180. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentry, A. H. (1993). A field guide to the families and genera of woody plants of Northwest South America (Colombia, Ecuador, Peru). Phyllocarpus: 512. Conservation International, Washington, DC.

  • Herendeen, P. S., Bruneau, A. & Lewis, G. P. (2003a). Phylogenetic relationships in caesalpinioid legumes: a preliminary analysis based on morphological and molecular data. In: B. B. Klitgaard & A. Bruneau (eds.), Advances in Legume Systematics, Part 10, higher level systematics. pp. 37 – 62. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.

    Google Scholar 

  • ____, Lewis, G. P. & Bruneau, A. (2003b). Floral morphology in caesalpinioid legumes: testing the monophyly of the “Umtiza clade”. Int. J. Plant Sci. 164 (5 Suppl.): S393 – S407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isely, D. (1975). Leguminosae of the United States: II. Subfamily Caesalpinioideae. Mem. New York Bot. Gard. 25(2): 178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkbride, J. H. Jr. (1999). Barnebydendron, a new generic name (Fabaceae, Caesalpinioideae, Detarieae, Brownea group). Sida 18 (3): 815 – 818.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, G. P. (2005). Tribe Caesalpinieae. In: G. Lewis, B. Schrire, B. Mackinder & M. Lock (eds.) Legumes of the World, pp. 127 – 161. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackinder, B. (2005). Tribe Detarieae. In: G. Lewis, B. Schrire, B. Mackinder & M. Lock (eds.), Legumes of the World, pp. 69 – 109. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrire, B. D., Lewis, G. P. & Lavin, M. (2005). Biogeography of the Leguminosae. In G. Lewis, B. Schrire, B. Mackinder & M. Lock (eds.), Legumes of the World, pp. 21 – 54. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. B. (1966). The great bromeliad hoax. Bromel. Soc. Bull. 16: 4 – 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Standley, P. C. & Steyermark, J. A. (1946). Flora of Guatemala. Fieldiana: Botany 24 (5): Phyllocarpus on pp. 144 – 145. Chicago Natural History Museum, Chicago.

  • Tulasne, L. R. (1843). Nova Leguminosarum genera. Phyllocarpus. Ann. Sci. Nat., Bot., sér. 2., 20: 142 – 143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodson R. E. Jr., Schery, R. W. & collaborators (1951). Flora of Panama, part 5, fasc. 3 (Leguminosae, second part). Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 38(1): Phyllocarpus on pp. 24 – 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wurdack, J. J. (1970). Erroneous data in Glaziou collections of Melastomataceae. Taxon 19: 911 – 913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the curators of the herbaria at F, MO, NY and P for kindly loaning material for study and two anonymous reviewers for their input. This work was supported in part by National Science Foundation grant DEB-0316375.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. P. Lewis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Warwick, M.C., Lewis, G.P. & Lima, H.C.d. A reappraisal of Barnebydendron (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae: Detarieae). Kew Bull 63, 143–149 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12225-007-9001-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12225-007-9001-y

Keywords

Navigation