Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Dynamics of herbaceous vegetation during four years of experimental coppice introduction

  • Published:
Folia Geobotanica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Understanding the effects of coppicing on forest ecosystems is important for progress towards sustainable forest management. A newly established coppicing experiment in a secondary temperate deciduous forest in the SE Czech Republic provides a rather unique insight into succession driven by canopy thinning in a forest still lacking species typical for forests established a long time ago. Herbaceous layer vegetation was monitored for four subsequent years in 2012–2015. We focused on the influence of canopy thinning intensity in two different forest types defined by dominant tree species (oak and lime). Our results showed that the opening of the canopy had immediate effects on herbaceous vegetation. Coverage, species richness and compositional patterns followed the coppicing intensity gradient. The dominant tree species had contrasting effects. Under oak, the reaction to coppicing was weak. Under lime, strong reaction both related to coppicing intensity and temporal development was observed. Herbs with short life cycle had the greatest contribution, but perennial grasses also began to increase their coverage after coppicing. Several invasive species, mostly short-lived herbs, emerged but are supposed to retreat as the succession will proceed. We conclude that coppice introduction into a secondary forest led to contrasting patterns related to dominant tree species. The marked difference was probably due to the slow succession towards a future forest community saturated by species. This process may now be further diversified by coppicing management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ash JE, Barkham JP (1976) Changes and variability in the field layer of a coppiced woodland in Norfolk, England. J Ecol 64:697–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baeten L, Bauwens B, De Schrijver A, De Keersmaeker L, Van Calster H, Vandekerkhove K, Roelandt B, Beeckman H, Verheyen K (2009) Herb layer changes (1954–2000) related to the conversion of coppice-with-standards forest and soil acidification. Appl Veg Sci 12:187–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battles JJ, Shlisky AJ, Barrett RH, Heald RC, Allen-Diaz BH (2001) The effects of forest management on plant species diversity in a Sierran conifer forest. Forest Ecol Managem 146:211–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beneš J, Čížek O, Dovala J, Konvička M (2006) Intensive game keeping, coppicing and butterflies: the story of Milovicky Wood, Czech Republic. Forest Ecol Managem 237:353–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernhardt-Römermann M, Ewald J (2006) Einst zu wenig, heute zu viel: Stickstoff in Waldlebensgemeinschaften. Gefahrstoffe Reinhaltung der Luft 66:261–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobbink R, Hornung M, Roelofs JGM (1998) The effects of air-borne nitrogen pollutants on species diversity in natural and semi-natural European vegetation. J Ecol 86:717–738

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley GP (1992) (ed) Ecology and management of coppice woodlands. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess M (2014) Restoring abandoned coppice for birds: few effects of conservation management on occupancy, fecundity and productivity of hole nesting birds. Forest Ecol Managem 330:205–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton JI, Zenner EK, Frelich LE, Cornett MW (2009) Patterns of plant community structure within and among primary and second-growth northern hardwood forest stands. Forest Ecol Managem 258:2556–2568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calçada EA, Lenoir J, Plue J, Broeckx LS, Closset-Kopp D, Hermy M, Decocq G (2015) Spatial patterns of water-deposited seeds control plant species richness and composition in riparian forest landscapes. Landsc Ecol 30:2133–2146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chytrý M, Tichý L, Holt J, Botta-Dukát Z (2002) Determination of diagnostic species with statistical fidelity measures. J Veg Sci 13:79–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell JH (1978) Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. Science 199:1302–1310

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coyle JR, Halliday FW, Lopez BE, Palmquist KA, Wilfahrt PA, Hurlert AH (2014) Using trait and phylogenetic diversity to evaluate the generality of the stress-dominance hypothesis in eastern North American tree communities. Ecography 37:814–826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Decocq G, Aubert M, Dupont F, Alard D, Saguez R, Wattez-Franger A, De Foucault B, Delelis-Dusollier A, Bardat J (2004a) Plant diversity in a managed temperate deciduous forest: understorey response to two silvicultural systems. J Appl Ecol 41:1065–1079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Decocq G, Valentin B, Toussaint B, Hendoux F, Saguez R, Bardat J (2004b) Soil seed bank composition and diversity in a managed temperate deciduous forest. Biodivers & Conservation 13:2485–2509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dirnböck T, Grandin U, Bernhardt-Römermann M, Beudert B, Canullo R, Forsius M, Grabner M-T, Holmberg M, Kleemola S, Lundin L, Mirtl M, Neumann M, Pompei E, Salemaa M, Starlinger F, Staszewski T, Uziębło AK (2014) Forest floor vegetation response to nitrogen deposition in Europe. Global Change Biol 20:429–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodson EK, Peterson DW, Harrod RJ (2008) Understory vegetation response to thinning and burning restoration treatments in dry conifer forests of the eastern Cascades, USA. Forest Ecol Managem 255:3130–3140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elemans M (2004) Light, nutrients and the growth of herbaceous forest species. Acta Oecol 26:197–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller RJ, Warren MS (1993) Coppiced woodlands: their management for wildlife. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilliam F (2014) Introduction: the herbaceous layer – the forest between the trees. In Gilliam F (ed) The herbaceous layer in forests of eastern North America. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1–9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Griffis KL, Crawford JA, Wagner MR, Moir WH (2001) Understory response to management treatments in northern Arizona ponderosa pine forests. Forest Ecol Managem 146:239–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grime JP (2006) Plant strategies, vegetation processes, and ecosystem properties. John Wiley & Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Grulich V (2012) Red List of vascular plants of the Czech Republic. Preslia 84:631–645

    Google Scholar 

  • Hédl R, Kopecký M, Komárek J (2010) Half a century of succession in a temperate oakwood: from species-rich community to mesic forest. Diversity & Distrib 16:267–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermy M, Verheyen K (2007) Legacies of the past in the present-day forest biodiversity: a review of past land-use effects on forest plant species composition and diversity. In Nakashizuka T (ed) Sustainability and diversity of forest ecosystems. Springer Japan, pp 361–371

  • Hermy M, Honnay O, Firbank L, Grashof-Bokdam C, Lawesson JE (1999) An ecological comparison between ancient and other forest plant species of Europe, and the implications for forest conservation. Biol Conservation 91:9–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbie SE (2015) Plant species effects on nutrient cycling: revisiting litter feedbacks. Trends Ecol Evol 30:357–363

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hölscher D, Schade E, Leuschner C (2001) Effects of coppicing in temperate deciduous forests on ecosystem nutrient pools and soil fertility. Basic Appl Ecol 2:155–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honnay O, Degroote B, Hermy M (1998) Ancient-forest plant species in Western Belgium: a species list and possible ecological mechanisms. Belg J Bot 130:139–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirby KJ (1990) Changes in the ground flora of a broadleaved wood within a clear fell, group fells and a coppiced block. Forestry 63:241–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirby KJ, Watkins C (eds) (2015) Europe's changing woods and forests: from wildwood to managed landscapes. CABI, Wallingford

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopecký M, Hédl R, Szabó P (2013) Non-random extinctions dominate plant community changes in abandoned coppices. J Appl Ecol 50:79–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kubát K, Hrouda L, Chrtek J jun, Kaplan Z, Kirschner J, Štěpánek J (eds) (2002) Klíč ke květeně České republiky [Key to the flora of the Czech Republic]. Academia, Praha

  • Lindh BC (2008) Flowering of understory herbs following thinning in the western Cascades, Oregon. Forest Ecol Managem 256:929–936

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews JD (1991) Silvicultural systems. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews TJ, Borregaard MK, Ugland KI, Borges PAV, Rigal F, Cardoso P, Whittaker RJ (2014) The gambin model provides a superior fit to species abundance distributions with a single free parameter: evidence, implementation and interpretation. Ecography 37:1002–1011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metzger F, Schultz J (1984) Understory response to 50 years of management of a northern hardwood forest in Upper Michigan. Amer Midl Naturalist 112:209–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muys B (1995) The influence of tree species on humus quality and nutrient availability on a regional scale (Flanders, Belgium). In Nilsson LO, Hüttl RF, Johansson UT (eds) Nutrient uptake and cycling in forest ecosystems. Springer Netherlands, pp 649–660

    Google Scholar 

  • Neirynck J, Mirtcheva S, Sioen G, Lust N (2000) Impact of Tilia platyphyllos Scop., Fraxinus excelsior L., Acer pseudoplatanus L., Quercus robur L. and Fagus sylvatica L. on earthworm biomass and physico-chemical properties of a loamy topsoil. Forest Ecol Managem 133:275–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newton AC (2007) Forest ecology and conservation: a handbook of techniques. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pelíšek J (1957) Stanovištní poměry pařezin v oblasti ČSR [Stand conditions in the coppices of the Czech Socialistic Republic]. Lesnictví 3:85–108

    Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. Available at http://www.R-project.org

  • Rackham O (2003) Ancient woodland, its history, vegetation and uses in England. Castlepoint Press, Colvend

    Google Scholar 

  • Rackham O (2006) Woodlands. Collins, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Radtke A, Ambraß S, Zerbe S, Tonon G, Fontana V, Ammer C (2013) Traditional coppice forest management drives the invasion of Ailanthus altissima and Robinia pseudoacacia into deciduous forests. Forest Ecol Managem 291:308–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roscher C, Schumacher J, Gubsch M, Lipowsky A, Weigelt A, Buchmann A, Schmid B, Schulze E (2012) Using Plant Functional Traits to Explain Diversity-Productivity Relationships. PLoS ONE 7:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savill P, Perrins C, Kirby K, Fisher N (eds) (2010) Wytham Woods: Oxford's ecological laboratory. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Shugart HH (1984) A theory of forest dynamics: the ecological implications of forest succession models. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Spitzer L, Konvička M, Beneš J, Tropek R, Tuf IH, Tufová J (2008) Does closure of traditionally managed open woodlands threaten epigeic invertebrates? Effects of coppicing and high deer densities. Biol Conservation 141:827–837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szabó P, Müllerová J, Suchánková S, Kotačka M (2015) Intensive woodland management in the Middle Ages: spatial modelling based on archival data. J Hist Geogr 48:1–10

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • ter Braak CJF, Šmilauer P (2012) Canoco reference manual and user's guide: software for ordination, version 5.0 Microcomputer Power, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson K, Bakker JP, Bekker RM, Hodgson JG (1998) Ecological correlates of seed persistence in soil in the north-west European flora. J Ecol 86:163–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thysell DR, Carey AB (2001) Manipulation of density of Pseudotsuga menziesii canopies: preliminary effects on understory vegetation. Canad J Forest Res 31:1513–1525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tichý L (2002) JUICE, software for vegetation classification. J Veg Sci 13:451–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Calster H, Baeten L, De Schrijver A, De Keersmaeker L, Rogister JE, Verheyen K, Hermy M (2007) Management driven changes (1967–2005) in soil acidity and the understorey plant community following conversion of a coppice-with-standards forest. Forest Ecol Managem 241:258–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Calster H, Baeten L, Verheyen K, De Keersmaeker L, Dekeyser S, Rogister JE, Hermy M (2008a) Diverging effects of overstorey conversion scenarios on the understorey vegetation in a former coppice-with-standards forest. Forest Ecol Managem 256:519–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Calster H, Chevalier R, Wyngene B, Archaux F, Verheyen K, Hermy M (2008b) Long-term seed bank dynamics in a temperate forest under conversion from coppice-with-standards to high forest management. Appl Veg Sci 11:251–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vesterdal L, Schmidt IK, Callesen I, Nilsson LO, Gundersen P (2008) Carbon and nitrogen in forest floor and mineral soil under six common European tree species. Forest Ecol Managem 255:35–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vild O, Roleček J, Hédl R, Kopecký M, Utinek D (2013) Experimental restoration of coppice-with-standards: response of understorey vegetation from the conservation perspective. Forest Ecol Managem 310:234–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren MS, Thomas JA (1992) Butterfly responses to coppicing. In Buckley GP (ed) Ecology and management of coppice woodlands. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 249–270

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • West DC, Shugart HH, Botkin DF (eds) (2012). Forest succession: concepts and application. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

Web resources

Download references

Acknowledgements

The results published in this paper were obtained with financial support from the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic, grant CZ.1.07/2.3.00/20.0267 ‘Coppice forests as the production and biological alternative for the future’. Additional support to the authors came from the European Research Council (FP7/2007-2013) grant 278065 ‘Long-term woodland dynamics in Central Europe: from estimations to a realistic model’ and as a long-term research development project RVO 67985939 from the Czech Academy of Sciences. M.C. was supported from the project MUNI/A /1048/2015.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Radim Hédl.

Appendices

Appendix 1

ᅟ Summary of the Monte Carlo significance test for the CCA model restricted by the interaction between forest management intensity, tree species and year.

Appendix 2

ᅟ Summary of the Monte Carlo significance test for the CCA model restricted by the interaction between forest management intensity and tree species.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hédl, R., Šipoš, J., Chudomelová, M. et al. Dynamics of herbaceous vegetation during four years of experimental coppice introduction. Folia Geobot 52, 83–99 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12224-016-9281-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12224-016-9281-9

Keywords

Navigation