Skip to main content
Log in

Growth dynamics of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes): a modeling approach

  • Published:
Rendiconti Lincei Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study aims to develop a dynamic numerical model to describe the growth and interactions between the shoot and root systems of Eichhornia crassipes along the irrigation canals in the Nile Delta, Egypt. While carrying out this study, the shoot and root biomasses of E. crassipes were sampled monthly from April to November 2014 over three irrigation canals in the Nile Delta using five randomly distributed quadrats (each 0.5 × 0.5 m) at each canal. Two state variables, shoot and root systems biomasses, were considered to follow the growth of E. crassipes. The biomass of each organ was simulated to incorporate the net growth of the plant as a function of photosynthesis, respiration, mortality and translocation from the shoot to the root system. After validating the model with data from the Nile Delta, it was verified using four independent sets of published field data: 19°50′S (Brazil), 19°57′N (Mexico), 29°38′N (USA) and 30°33′N (China). The level of agreement between the simulated values and actual field data indicated that the model was capable of simulating the total biomass of E. crassipes over a wide range of latitudes. Global sensitivity analysis showed that of all the parameters that were used, the model was most sensitive to the maximum photosynthetic growth rate. Based on our results, we recommend the following: first, if E. crassipes is used to remove water pollution or in animal feed, manure, mulch, or the production of biogas, pulp and paper, then E. crassipes stands should be harvested at peak net production. Second, if the main purpose of E. crassipes management is to suppress its growth or eradicate the plant from an irrigation canal, then the harvest should be at the point of the minimum net production.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akbay KS, Wooten JW, Howell FG (1988) Simulation model of water hyacinth and its biocontrol agents: report 1, first-generation model. Technical report A-88, US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi

  • Akbay KS, Howell FG, Wooten JW (1991) A computer simulation model of waterhyacinth and weevil interactions. J Aquat Plant Manage 29:15–20

    Google Scholar 

  • APHA (American Public Health Association) (1998) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Asaeda T, Karunaratne S (2000) Dynamic modeling of the growth of Phragmites australis: model description. Aquat Bot 67:301–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asaeda T, Hai DN, Manatunge J, Williams D, Roberts J (2005) Latitudinal characteristics of below and above-ground biomass of Typha: a modeling approach. Ann Bot 96:299–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulos L (2005) Flora of Egypt, vol 4. Monocotyledons (Alismataceae—Orchidaceae). Al-Hadara Publishing, Cairo

  • Brun R, Reichert P, Künsch HR (2001) Practical identifiability analysis of large environmental simulation models. Water Resour Res 37:1015–1030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buller LS, Bergier I, Ortega E, Salis SM (2013) Dynamic energy valuation of water hyacinth biomass in wetlands: an ecological approach. J Clean Prod 54:177–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butcher JC (2008) Numerical methods for ordinary differential equations. Wiley, West Sussex

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • DeBusk TA, Ryther JH, Hanisak MD, Williams LD (1981) Effects of seasonality and plant density on the productivity of some freshwater macrophytes. Aquat Bot 10:133–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eid EM, Shaltout KH (2016) Population dynamics of Eichhornia crassipes (C. Mart.) Solms in Nile Delta, Egypt. Plant Spec Biol. doi:10.1111/1442-1984.12154

  • Eid EM, Shaltout KH, Asaeda T (2012) Modeling growth dynamics of Typha domingensis (Pers.) Poir. ex Steud. in Lake Burullus, Egypt. Ecol Mod 243:63–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eid EM, Galal TM, Dakhil MA, Hassan LM (2016) Modeling the growth dynamics of Pistia stratiotes L. populations along the water courses of south Nile Delta, Egypt. Rend Fis Acc Lincei 27:375–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EMA (Egyptian Meteorological Authority) (1980) Climatic normals for the Arab Republic of Egypt up to 1975. Ministry of Civil Aviation, Meteorological Authority, General Organization for Governmental Printing Offices, Cairo

    Google Scholar 

  • Fayad YH, Ibrahim AA, El-Zoghby AA, Shalaby FF (2001) Ongoing activities in the biological control of water hyacinth in Egypt. In: Julien MH, Hill MP, Center TD, Jianquig D (eds) Biological and integrated control of water hyacinth Eichhornia crassipes. ACIAR Proc 102, pp 43–46

  • Gamage NPD, Asaeda T (2004) Population dynamics of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes). Rep Res Edu Ctr Inlandwat Environ 2:35–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopal B (1987) Water hyacinth (aquatic plant studies). Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant WE, Swannack TM (2008) Ecological modeling: a common-sense approach to theory and practice. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Greco MKB, Freitas JR (2002) On two methods to estimate production of Eichhornia crassipes in the eutrophic Pampulha reservoir (MG, Brazil). Braz J Biol 62:463–471

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez EL, Ruiz EF, Uribe EG, Martínez JM (2001) Biomass and productivity of water hyacinth and their application in control programs. In: Julien MH, Hill MP, Center TD, Jianquig D (eds) Biological and integrated control of water hyacinth, Eichhornia crassipes. ACIAR Proc 102, pp 109–119

  • Hai DN, Asaeda T, Manatunge J (2006) Latitudinal effect on the growth dynamics of harvested stands of Typha: a modeling approach. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 70:613–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haller WT, Knipling EB, West SH (1970) Phosphorus absorption by and distribution in water hyacinths. Proc Soil Crop Sci Soc Fl 30:64–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Havens KE, Fukushima T, Xie P, Iwakuma T, James RT, Takamura N, Hanazato T, Yamamoto T (2001) Nutrient dynamics and the eutrophication of shallow lakes Kasumigaura (Japan), Donghu (PR China), and Okeechobee (USA). Environ Pollut 111:263–272

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holm LG, Plucknett DL, Pancho JV, Herberger JP (1977) The world’s worst weeds: distribution and biology. The University Press of Hawaii, Honolulu

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu W, Salomonsen J, Xu F-L, Pu P (1998) A model for the effects of water hyacinth on water quality in an experiment of physic-biological engineering in Lake Taihu, China. Ecol Mod 107:171–188

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen SE, Jørgensen LA, Nielsen LK, Mejer HF (1981) Parameter estimation in eutrophication modeling. Ecol Mod 13:111–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Junk JW, Piedade MTF (1997) Plant life in the floodplain with special reference to herbaceous plants. In: Junk JW (ed) The central Amazon floodplain: ecology of a pulsing system. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 147–185

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Liu C, Wu G, Yu D, Wang D, Xia S (2004) Seasonal changes in height, biomass and biomass allocation of two exotic aquatic plants in a shallow eutrophic lake. J Freshw Ecol 19:41–45

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lorber MN, Mishoe JW, Reddy PR (1984) Modeling and analysis of waterhyacinth biomass. Ecol Mod 24:61–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luu KT, Getsinger KD (1990) Seasonal biomass and carbohydrate distribution in waterhyacinth: small-scale evaluation. Technical report A-90-1, US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi

  • Mahujchariyawong J, Ikeda S (2001) Modelling of environmental phytoremediation in eutrophic river—the case of water hyacinth harvest in Tha-chin River, Thailand. Ecol Mod 142:121–134

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mitsch WJ (1975) Systems analysis of nutrient disposal in Cypress wetlands and lake ecosystems in Florida. Dissertation, University of Florida

  • Mitsch WJ (1976) Ecosystem modelling of waterhyacinth management in Lake Alice, Florida. Ecol Mod 2:69–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NASA-POWER (2015) Climatology resource for agroclimatology. NASA prediction of worldwide energy. http://power.larc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/cgiwrap/solar/agro.cgi

  • Pineiro G, Perelman S, Guerschman JP, Paruelo JM (2008) How to evaluate models: observed vs. predicted or predicted vs. observed? Ecol Mod 216:316–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price WL (1979) A controlled random search procedure for global optimization. Comput J 20:367–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotella AR (2010) Growth and biomass of water hyacinth in a tidal blackwater river system, South Carolina. Dissertation, Coastal Carolina University

  • Sale PJM, Orr PT, Shell GS, Erskine DJC (1985) Photosynthesis and growth rates in Salvinia molesta and Eichhornia crassipes. J Appl Ecol 22:125–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soetaert K, Hoffmann M, Meire P, Starink M, van Oevelen D, van Regenmortel S, Cox T (2004) Modeling growth and carbon allocation in two reed beds (Phragmites australis) in the Scheldt estuary. Aquat Bot 79:211–234

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer DF, Ksander GG (2005) Seasonal growth of waterhyacinth in the Sacramento/San Joaquin Delta, California. J Aquat Plant Manage 43:91–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Statsoft (2007) Statistica version 7.1. Statsoft Inc, Tulsa

  • Sucharit S, Harinasuta C, Deesin T, Vutikes S (1981) Studies of aquatic plants and grasses as breeding hosts for mosquitoes. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 12:464–465

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JR, Holst N, Rees M (2005) Determinants and patterns of population growth in water hyacinth. Aquat Bot 81:51–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahran MA (2009) Hydrophytes of the Nile in Egypt. In: Dumont HJ (ed) The Nile: origin, environments, limnology and human use. Springer, The Netherlands, pp 463–478

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the two anonymous reviewers and the editor for their useful comments on an earlier version. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ebrahem M. Eid.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 5 and 6.

Table 5 List of equations used in the Eichhornia model to simulate the growth of Eichhornia crassipes populations in three irrigation canals in the Nile Delta, Egypt
Table 6 List of parameters used in the Eichhornia model to simulate the growth of Eichhornia crassipes populations in three irrigation canals in the Nile Delta, Egypt

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Eid, E.M., Shaltout, K.H. Growth dynamics of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes): a modeling approach. Rend. Fis. Acc. Lincei 28, 169–181 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12210-016-0589-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12210-016-0589-4

Keywords

Navigation