Abstract
The perceived level of public service quality and customer satisfaction may be improved by the customer-oriented behaviour of the service provider. The desired external orientation of public service provision requires marketing based modelling. In order to measure the market orientation of the municipal service provision companies and to test the casual relationships proposed by the research model the survey method is employed. The sample is analysed by confirmatory principal component analysis and relationships are tested by linear regression analysis as well as correlation analyses. According to the results of this study market orientation plays a significant role in public sector by positively influencing customer satisfaction and service quality. There is evidence that intelligence gathering by front line employees and response action elaboration play crucial roles in the service provision, which points on the importance of staff. Findings also suggest that in the municipal service provision of Hungary the market orientation is highly supported by the commitment of staff and team spirit, while market turbulence, political influence and organizational conflict have reverse impacts. The findings also show that the salient internal antecedent factor of market orientation is interdepartmental connectedness rather than top managements’ emphasis. Based on the study it is to conclude that the focus on political initiatives by the management of the public service providers generates performance loss in customers’ dimensions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allison, G. T. (1979). Public and private management: Are they fundamentally alike in all unimportant aspects? In J. M. Shafritz & A. C. Hyde (Eds.), Classics of public administration (pp. 395–468). Boston: Wadsworth.
Ashworth, R., Boyne, G., & Entwistle, T. (2010). Public service improvement, theories and evidence. New York: Oxford University Press.
Boyne, G., Meier, K.J. (2009) Environmental turbulence, organizational stability and public service performance. Administration and Society, 40(8), 799–824
Carman, J. M. (1980). Paradigms for marketing theory. Research in Marketing, 3, 1–26.
Caruana, A., Ramaseshan, B., & Ewing, M. T. (1998). Do universities that are more market oriented perfrom better? International Journal of Public Sector Management, 11(1), 55–70.
Caruana, A., Ramaseshan, B., & Ewing, M. T. (1999). Market orientation and performance in the public sector: The role of organizational commitment. Journal of Global Marketing, 12(3), 59–79.
Cervera, A., Molla, A., & Sanchez, M. (2001). Antecedents and consequences of market orientation in public organisations. European Journal of Marketing, 35(11/12), 1259–1286.
Churchill Jr., G. A. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, XVI, 64–73.
Despandhe, R., Farley, J. U., & Webster, F. E. (1993). Corporate culture, customer orientation, and innovatieness in Japanese firms: A quardad analysis. Journal of Marketing, 57, 23–37.
Drummond, G., Ensor, J., Laing, A., & Richardson, N. (2000). Market orientation applied to police service strategies. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 13, 571–587.
Frederickson, H. G., Smith, K. B., Larimer, C. W., & Licari, M. J. (2012). The public administration theory primer. USA: Westview Press, Perseus Books.
Ganier, B., & Padanyi, P. (2005). Applying the marketing concept to cultural organizations: An empirical study of the relationship between market orientation and performance. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 7(2), 182–193.
Garcia, R., Alvarez, G. M., Ignacio, L., & Bello Acebron, L. (2013). The untapped potential of marketing for evaluating the effectiveness of nonprofit organizations: A framework proposal. International Review of Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 10, 87. doi:10.1007/s12208-012-0085-1.
Jaworski, B. J., & Kohli, A. K. (1993). Market orientation: Antescendents and consequences. Journal of Marketing, 57, 53–70.
Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2009). The increasing importance of public sector marketing: Explanations, applications and limits of marketing within public administration. European Management Journal, 27, 197–212.
Kirca, A. H., Jayachandran, S., & Bearden, W. O. (2005). Market orientation: A meta-analytic Review and assessment of its Antescendents and impact on performance. Journal of Marketing, 69(2005), 24–41.
Kohli, A. K., & Jaworski, B. J. (1990). The construct, research propostition, and managerian implications. Journal of Marketing, 54(2), 1–18.
Kohli, A. K., Jaworski, B. J., & Kumar, A. (1993). A measure of market orientation. Journal of Marketing Research, 30(4), 467–477.
Kornai, J. (1986). The soft budget constrain. Kyklos, 39, 3–30.
Kotler, P., & Lee, N. (2007). Marketing in the public sector, roadmap for improved performance. New York: Pearson, Prentice Hall.
Kotler, P., & Levy, S. J. (1969). Broadening the concept of marketing. Journal of Marketing, 33, 10–15.
Laing, A. (2003). Marketing in the public sector: Towards a typology of public services. Marketing Theory Articles, 3(4), 427–445.
Lamb Jr., C. W. (1987). Public sector marketing is different (pp. 56–60). July/August: Business Horizons.
Lusch, R. F., & Vargo, S. L. (2014). Service-dominant logic, premises, perspectives, possibilities. Cambridge: University Printing House.
Maier, F., Meyer, M., & Steinbereithner, M. (2016). Nonprofit organizations becoming business-like: A systematic Review. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45(1), 64–86.
Modi, P., & Mishra, D. (2010). Conceptualising market orientation in non-profit organizations: Definition, performance, a preliminary construction of a scale. Journal of Marketing Management, 26(5/6), 548–569.
Narver, J. C., & Slater, F. S. (1990). The effect of a market orientation on business profitability. Journal of Marketing, 54(4), 20–35.
Niculescu, M., Xu, B., Hampton, G. M., & Peterson, R. T. (2013). Market orientation and its measurement in universities. Administrative Issues Journal: Education, Practice, and Research. doi:10.5929/2013.3.2.2.
Pálné K. I., Finta I. (2013). A helyi közszolgáltatások versenyképességet szolgáló modernizálása. MTA Közgazdaság- és Regionális Tudományi Kutatóközpont Regionális Kutatások Intézete, 1.sz. összegző taulmány, Pécs, 2013. június 30. (ÁROP-1.1.22-2012-2012-001 kódszámú projekt).
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing, Fall, 1985, 41–50.
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring customer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, Spring, 1988, 12–40.
Pasquier, M., & Villeneuve, J. P. (2012). Marketing management and communication in the public sector. Routledge.
Rodrigues, A. P., & Pinho, M. R. (2010). Market orientation, job satisfaction, commitment and organisational performance the specific case of local public sector. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 4(2), 172–192.
Shoham, A., Ruvio, A., Vigoda-Gabot, E., & Schwabsky, N. (2006). Market orientation in the nonprifit and voluntary sector: A meta-analysis of their relationship with organizational performance. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35(3), 453–476.
Van der Hart, H. W. C. (1991). Government organizations and their customers in the Netherlands: Strategy, tactics and operations. European Journal of Marketing, 24(7), 31–42.
Vidler, E., & Clarke, J. (2005). Creating citizen-consumers: New labour and the remaking of public services. Public Policy and Administration, 20(2), 19–37.
Walker, R. M., Brewer, G. A., Boyne, G. A., & Avellaneda, C. N. (2011). Market orientation and public service performance: New public management gone mad? (pp. 707–717). September/October: Public Administration Review.
Zebal, M. A., & Goodwin, D. R. (2012). Market orientation and performance in private universities. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 30(3), 339–357.
Zeithaml, V. A., Berry, L., & Parasuraman, A. (1988). Communication and control processes in the delivery of service quality. Journal of Marketing, 1988, 35–48.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Józsa, T. The antecedents of market orientation and its effect on customer satisfaction and service quality: The case of Hungarian municipal public service provisions. Int Rev Public Nonprofit Mark 14, 391–407 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-017-0179-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-017-0179-x