Skip to main content
Log in

Finite element model updating of a simply supported skewed PSC I-girder bridge using Hybrid Genetic Algorithm

  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hybrid Genetic Algorithm (HGA) which combines the genetic algorithm as a global optimization and the simplex method as a local optimization is proposed for a finite element model updating of a real prestressed concrete bridge structure. In order to minimize the updating error between the measurement and the finite element model updating result, objective functions which are combinations of fitness functions based on the natural frequency, the mode shape and the static displacement are introduced. And an interface tool is also developed in order to utilize various element library and numerical analysis tools which are provided by commercial finite element and numerical analysis programs. A simply supported skewed PSC girder bridge which has 30 m span length is selected for the verification of the proposed FE model updating algorithm. Static vehicle loading test and forced vibration test by traveling vehicle as well as ambient vibration test were carried out to obtain the reference measurement data for numerical updating. A grillage model is used for the finite element analysis. Effect of the spring element to simulate the realistic support condition which is not perfectly free or restrained in real situation as well as that of the objective function on the updating accuracy are studied. From the result of parametric study, it is investigated that the use of spring element for support condition is effective to minimize the updating error for natural frequency and mode shape. Furthermore, including the static displacement fitness function together with those of dynamic properties may improve the global behavior of updated finite element model. It is concluded that the hybrid genetic algorithm proposed in this study is a very effective finite element model updating method to find an accurate result in updating real bridge structure based on measured data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ABAQUS (2007). ABAQUS user’s manual, ABAQUS, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, R. R. and Ivey, J. S. (1996). “Nelder-mead simplex modifications for simulation optimization.” Management Science, Vol. 42, No. 7, pp. 954–973.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • BRIDGE DIAGNOSTICS, Inc. (2001). Load test and rating report puget sound & pacific railroad bridge steel through-truss Bridge-MP 1.7 Centralia, WA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, J. E. Jr. and Woods, D. J. (1987). New computing environments: Microcomputers in large-scale computing, Edited by A. Wouk, SIAM, pp. 116–122.

  • Farhat, C. and Hemez, F. M. (1993). “Updating finite element dynamic models using an element-by-element sensitivity methodology.” American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Journal, Vol. 31, No. 9, pp. 1702–1711.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Felber, A. J. (1993). Development of a hybrid bridge evaluation system, PhD Dissertation, UMI Dissertation Service, Department of Civil Engineering, The University of British Columbia, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felber, A. J. and Reto, C. (1996). Introduction of a new ambient vibration testing system-description of the system and seven bridge tests, EMPA, CH-8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friswell, M. I. and Mottershead, J. E. (1995). Finite element model updating in structural dynamics, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J. H. (1975). Adaptation in natural and artificial systems, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imregun, M. and Visser, W. J. (1991). “A review of model updating techniques.” The Shock and Vibration Digest, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 9–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaishi, B. and Ren, W. X. (2006). “Damage detection by finite element model updating using modal flexibility residual.” Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 290, No. 2, pp. 369–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung, D. S. and Kim, C. Y. (2007). “Hybrid optimization technique based on GA-NMS for FE model updating.” Proceedings of the IMAC-XXV: A Conference & Exposition on Structural Dynamics, Orlando, Florida, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, D. S. and Kim, C. Y. (2009). “FE model updating based on hybrid genetic algorithm and its verification on numerical bridge model.” Structural Engineering and Mechanics, Vol. 32, No. 5, pp. 667–683.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, R. I. and Lieven, N. A. J. (1998). “Dynamic finite element model updating using simulated annealing and genetic algorithms.” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 91–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merce, R. N., Doz, G. N., Brito, J. L. V., Macdonald, J. H. G., and Friswell, M. I. (2007). “Finite element model updating of a suspension bridge using ansys software.” Inverse Problems, Design and Optimization Symposium, Miami, Florida, U.S.A., pp. 16–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modak, S. V. and Kundra, T. K. (2000). “Model updating using constrained optimization.” Mechanics Research Communications, Vol. 27, No. 5, pp. 543–551.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mottershead, J. E. and Friswell, M. I. (1993). “Model updating in structural dynamics: A survey.” Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 167, No. 2, pp. 347–375.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Nelder, J. A. and Mead, R. (1965). “A simplex method for function minimization.” The Computer Journal, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 308–311.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rafiq, M. Y., Sui, C., Zhou, G. C., Easterbrook, D. J., and Bugmann, G. (2005). “Using artificial intelligence techniques to predict the behaviour of masonry panels.” Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on the Application of Artificial Intelligence to Civil, Civil-Comp Press, Stirling, Scotland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanayei, M., Phelps, J. E., Sipple, J. D., Bell, E. S., and Brenner, B. R. (2012). “Instrumentation, nondestructive testing, and finite-element model updating for bridge evaluation using strain measurements.” Journal of Bridge Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 130–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Mathworks (2006). MATLAB & SIMULINK user’s guide: MATLAB release 2006, The Mathworks, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, O. and Ou, J. (2009). “Model updating of laboratorial long-span cable-stayed bridge.” Sixth International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations, IEEE Computer Society, Las Vegas, NV, USA, pp. 1697–1700.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Q. W., Chang, C.C., and Chang, T. Y. P. (2000). “Finite element model updating for structures with parametric constraints”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 29, No. 7, pp. 927–944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Q. (2011). “Dynamic model updating of long-span bridge based on optimization design principle under environment excitation.” 2011 International Conference on Consumer Electronics, Communications and Networks (CECNet), IEEE Conference Publications, Xian Ning, pp. 1178–1181.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, H. and Hao, X. (2006). “Comparison of analytical approaches to structural model updating using modal test data.” ASCE Proceedings on Earth & Space 2006: Engineering, Construction, and Operation in Challenging Environment, ASCE Houston, Texas, USA, pp. 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chul-Young Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jung, DS., Kim, CY. Finite element model updating of a simply supported skewed PSC I-girder bridge using Hybrid Genetic Algorithm. KSCE J Civ Eng 17, 518–529 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-013-0599-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-013-0599-z

Keywords

Navigation