Abstract
Security—in air transportation is an issue of global importance. Since September 11, 2001 there have been numerous events where terrorists have successfully exploited vulnerabilities and weakness in the security system. The authors, both security practitioners and academics—contribute to the discussion of what security in air transportation means—by proposing that the existing system still remains vulnerable to future exploitation by terrorists and other threat groups. The essay proffers a framing device. The meaning of security is considered in terms of our knowledge of the system. It considers air transportation security from the position that our knowledge and understanding is limited by hubris; and explains how this can be improved so that system vulnerabilities are revealed and mitigated against before they are exploited. The essay concerns itself with the notion that air transportation security has a multitude of meanings, and that the system is in a critical state because it is perpetually reliant upon sophisticated technologies to retrospectively plug gaps in the defences. The essay concludes that complexity and hubris create a malign condition—which is not visible to lawmakers, regulators and system designers. And, to improve our understanding of what effective security means we need to look behind the hubristic curtain and grapple with the complexities and vagaries, which are the ingredients to the creation and incubation of system vulnerability and weakness.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams J (2008) Deus e Brasiliero. http://john-adams.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/deus-e-brasileiro1.pdf. Accessed 20th November 2013
Adams J (2013) Risk compensation in cities at risk. In Joffee H, Rossetto T (eds) Cities at risk: living with perils in the 21st century. J Adv Nat Technol Res 3:24–44
Dekker SWA (2005) Ten questions about human error: a new view of human factors and system safety. CRC Press, New York
Kahneman D (2011) Thinking fast and thinking slow. Penguin, London
LaTourrette T, Jenkins B (2012) The goal of efficient security. In: Jackson B, LaTourrette T, Chan E, Lundberg R, Morral A, Frelinger D (eds) Efficient aviation security: strengthening the analystic foundation for making air transportation security decisions. http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/ pubs/monographs/2012/RAND_MG1220.pdf. Accessed 20th November 2013
McFarlane P, Hills M (2013) Developing immunity to flight security risk: prospective benefits from considering aviation security as a socio-technical eco-system. J Transp Secur 6:221–234
Medwar P (1969) The art of the soluble: creativity and originality in science. Meuthen, London
Popper K (2002) The logic of scientific discovery. Routledge, London
Schmid A, Jongman A (2005) Political terrorism: a new guide to actors, authors, concepts, data bases, theories and literature. North Holland Publishing Company, New Jersey
Silke A (2010) Understanding terrorist target selection. In: Richards A, Fussey P, Silke A (eds) Terrorism and the olympics: major event security and lessons for the future. Routledge, London
Taleb N (2005) The black swan: the impact of the highly improbable. Penguin Group, London
Updike J (2001) The talk of the town. The New Yorker, September 24th. http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2001/09/24/010924ta_talk_wtc. Accessed 20th November 2013
Woods DD (2006) Essential characteristics of resilience. In: Hollnagel E, Woods DD, Leveson N (eds) Resilience engineering: concepts and precepts. Ashgate Publishing, Aldershot, p 21–23
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McFarlane, P., Hills, M. Towards a higher plane of air transportation security: from hubris to knowledge. J Transp Secur 7, 115–121 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12198-013-0133-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12198-013-0133-z