Skip to main content
Log in

Kinematic radiography of the hip joint after hip resurfacing arthroplasty

  • Published:
Radiological Physics and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of dynamic radiography using a dynamic flat-panel detector (FPD) system after hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA). A total of 32 hips of 26 patients who underwent HRA were included. Sequential images of active abduction in the supine position and flexion in the 45° semilateral position were obtained using the FPD system. We examined the imaging findings of impingement between the acetabular component and femoral neck with cooperative motion at maximal exercise. Moreover, the central component coordinate of the acetabulum and femoral head sides was measured. For abduction motion, impingement was detected in two (6.3 %) hips between the superior portion of the femoral neck and acetabular component. For flexion motion, impingement was detected in 19 (59.4 %) hips. There were no findings of subluxation between the acetabular component and femoral neck after impingement, but cooperative motion of lumbar and pelvic flexion was observed. There was no significant difference in the center-to-center distance regardless of the presence or absence of impingement. Detailed postoperative kinematics of the hips after HRA showed that the proposed dynamic FPD system could reveal acquired impingement and cooperative motion as dynamic images and possibly reveal findings that would be unobservable using static images.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ball ST, Schmalzried TP. Posterior femoroacetabular impingement (PFAI)—after hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Bull NYU Jt Dis. 2009;67(2):173–6.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Quesada MJ, Marker DR, Mont MA. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: advantages and disadvantages. J Arthroplast. 2008;23(7 Suppl):69–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen Z, Pandit H, Taylor A, Gill H, Murray D, Ostlere S. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacings—a radiological perspective. Eur Radiol. 2011;21(3):485–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. McMinn DJ, Daniel J, Ziaee H, Pradhan C. Indications and results of hip resurfacing. Int Orthop. 2011;35(2):231–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Back DL, Dalziel R, Young D, Shimmin A. Early results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings: an independent prospective study of the first 230 hips. J Bone Jt Surg Br. 2005;87(3):324–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hing CB, Young DA, Dalziel RE, Bailey M, Back DL, Shimmin AJ. Narrowing of the neck in resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: a radiological study. J Bone Jt Surg Br. 2007;89(8):1019–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Shimmin A, Beaule PE, Campbell P. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2008;90(3):637–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rahman L, Hall-Craggs M, Muirhead-Allwood SK. Radiology of the resurfaced hip. Skelet Radiol. 2011;40(7):819–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yoo MC, Cho YJ, Chun YS, Rhyu KH. Impingement between the acetabular cup and the femoral neck after hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2011;93(Suppl 2):99–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Malviya A, Lingard EA, Malik A, Bowman R, Holland JP. Hip flexion after Birmingham hip resurfacing: role of cup anteversion, anterior femoral head-neck offset, and head-neck ratio. J Arthroplast. 2010;25(3):387–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gruen TA, Le Duff MJ, Wisk LE, Amstutz HC. Prevalence and clinical relevance of radiographic signs of impingement in metal-on-metal hybrid hip resurfacing. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2011;93(16):1519–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kajino Y, Kabata T, Maeda T, Iawai S, Kuroda K, Fujita K, Tsuchiya H. Strict component positioning is necessary in hip resurfacing. J Orthop Sci. 2013;18(2):290–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kawashima H, Tada K, Suganuma S, Tsuchiya H, Sanada S. Wrist rhythm during wrist joint motion evaluated by dynamic radiography. Hand Surg. 2014;19(3):343–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tada K, Kawashima H, Horie K, Sanada S, Nishimura S, Tsuchiya H. An in vivo study of dynamic effects of wrist traction on the radiolunate and capitolunate joints. Hand Ther. 2015;20(2):49–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Koyanagi J, Sakai T, Yamazaki T, Watanabe T, Akiyama K, Sugano N, Yoshikawa H, Sugamoto K. In vivo kinematic analysis of squatting after total hip arthroplasty. Clin Biomech (Bristol Avon). 2011;26(5):477–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dimitriou D, Tsai TY, Li JS, Nam KW, Park KK, Kwon YM. In vivo kinematic evaluation of total hip arthroplasty during stair climbing. J Orthop Res. 2015;33(7):1087–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kluess D, Martin H, Mittelmeier W, Schmitz KP, Bader R. Influence of femoral head size on impingement, dislocation and stress distribution in total hip replacement. Med Eng Phys. 2007;29(4):465–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiroki Kawashima.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

This study was supported in part by a research grant from Canon Inc., Tokyo, Japan.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kawashima, H., Kajino, Y., Kabata, T. et al. Kinematic radiography of the hip joint after hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Radiol Phys Technol 9, 254–260 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-016-0357-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-016-0357-2

Keywords

Navigation