Abstract
For X-ray inspections by way of general X-ray equipment, it is important to measure an entrance-skin dose. Recently, a small optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dosimeter was made commercially available by Landauer, Inc. The dosimeter does not interfere with the medical images; therefore, it is expected to be a convenient detector for measuring personal exposure doses. In an actual clinical situation, it is assumed that X-rays of different energies will be detected by a dosimeter. For evaluation of the exposure dose measured by a dosimeter, it is necessary to know the energy dependence of the dosimeter. Our aim in this study was to measure the energy dependence of the OSL dosimeter experimentally in the diagnostic X-ray region. Metal samples weighing several grams were irradiated and, in this way, characteristic X-rays having energies ranging from 8 to 85 keV were generated. Using these mono-energetic X-rays, the dosimeter was irradiated. Simultaneously, the fluence of the X-rays was determined with a CdTe detector. The energy-dependent efficiency of the dosimeter was derived from the measured value of the dosimeter and the fluence. Moreover, the energy-dependent efficiency was calculated by Monte-Carlo simulation. The efficiency obtained in the experiment was in good agreement with that of the simulation. In conclusion, our proposed method, in which characteristic X-rays are used, is valuable for measurement of the energy dependence of a small OSL dosimeter in the diagnostic X-ray region.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Uffmann M, Prokop CS. Digital radiography: the balance between image quality and required radiation dose. Eur J Radiol. 2009;72:202–8.
Berrington de Gonzalez A, Darby S. Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-ray: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries. Lancet. 2004;363:345–51.
Komiya I, Shirasaka T, Umezu Y, Tachibana M, Izumi T. Patient dose measurement with fluorescent glass dosimeter: characteristics evaluation and patient skin dose measurement in abdominal interventional radiology. Jpn J Radiol Technol. 2003;60(2):270–7 (in Japanese).
Shortt CP, Malone L, Thornton J, Brennan P, Lee MJ. Radiation protection to the eye and thyroid during diagnostic cerebral angiography: a phantom study. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2008;52:365–9.
Matsunaga Y, Kawaguchi A, Kobayashi K, Asada Y, Takikawa Y, Yamada M, Suzuki S. Dose estimation for exposure conditions of diagnostic radiology acquired by a 2011 questionnaire in a phantom study. Jpn J Radiol Technol. 2013;69(12):1372–8 (in Japanese).
Grosswendt B. Backscatter factors for x-rays generated at voltages between 10 and 100 keV. Phys Med Biol. 1954;29(5):579–91.
Klevenhagen SC. Experimentally determined backscatter factors for x-rays generated at voltages between 16 and 140 kV. Phys Med Biol. 1989;34(12):1871–82.
Grosswendt B. Dependences of the photon backscatter factor for water on source-to-phantom distance and irradiation field size. Phys Med Biol. 1990;35(9):1233–45.
Kato H. Method of calculating the backscatter factor for diagnostic X-rays using the differential backscatter factor. Jpn J Radiol Technol. 2001;57(12):1503–10 (in Japanese).
Jursinic PA. Characterization of optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters, OSLDs, for clinical dosimetric measurements. Med Phys. 2007;34(12):4594–604.
Reft CS. The energy dependence and dose response of a commercial optically stimulated luminescent detector for kilovoltage photon, megavoltage photon, and electron, proton, and carbon beams. Med Phys. 2009;36(5):1690–9.
Lehmann J, Dunn L, Lye JE, Kenny JW, Alves ADC, Cole A, Asena A, Kron T, Williams IM. Angular dependence of the response of the nanoDot OSLD system for measurements at depth in clinical megavoltage beams. Med Phys. 2014;41(6):061712-1-9.
Kerns JR, Kry SF, Sahoo N, Followill DS, Ibbott GS. Angular dependence of the nanoDot OSL dosimeter. Med Phys. 2011;38(7):3955–62.
Hayashi H, Nakagawa K, Okino H, Takegami K, Okazaki T, Kobayashi I. High accuracy measurements by consecutive readings of OSL dosimeter. Med Imaging Inf Sci. 2014;31(2):28–34 (in Japanese).
Takegami K, Hayashi H, Nakagawa K, Okino H, Okazaki T, Kobayashi I. Measurement method of an exposed dose using the nanoDot dosimeter. Eur Congr Radiol (EPOS). 2015;. doi:10.1594/ecr2015/C-0218.
Takegami K, Hayashi H, Okino H, Kimoto N, Maehata I, Kanazawa Y, Tohru O, Kobayashi I. Practical calibration curve of small-type optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dosimeter for evaluation of entrance-skin dose in the diagnostic X-ray. Radiol Phys Technol. 2015;8(2):286–94.
Hayashi H, Takegami K, Okino H, Nakagawa K, Okazaki T, Kobayashi I. Procedure to measure angular dependences of personal dosimeters by means of diagnostic X-ray equipment. Med Imaging Inf Sci. 2015;32(1):8–14.
Okazaki T, Hayashi H, Takegami K, Okino H, Nakagawa K. Evaluation of angular dependence of nanoDot OSL dosimeters toward direct measurement of entrance skin dose. Eur Congr Radiol (EPOS). 2015;. doi:10.1594/ecr2015/C-0721.
Fukuda I, Hayashi H, Takegami K, Konishi Y. Development of an experimental apparatus for energy calibration of a CdTe detector by means of diagnostic X-ray equipment. Jpn J Radiol Technol. 2013;69(9):952–9 (in Japanese).
Okino H, Hayashi H, Nakagawa K, Takegami K. Measurement of response function of CdTe detector using diagnostic X-ray equipment and evaluation of Monte Carlo simulation code. Jpn J Radiol Technol. 2014;70(12):1381–91 (in Japanese).
Nakagawa K, Hayashi H, Okino H, Takegami K, Okazaki T, Kobayashi I. Fabrication of annealing equipment for optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dosimeter. Jpn J Radiol Technol. 2014;70(10):1135–42 (in Japanese).
Takegami K, Hayashi H, Konishi Y, Fukuda I. Development of multistage collimator for narrow beam production using filter guides of diagnostic X-ray equipment and improvement of apparatuses for practical training. Med Imaging Inf Sci. 2013;30(4):101–7 (in Japanese).
Hirayama H, Yoshihito N, Bielajew AF, Wilderman SJ, Nelson WR. The EGS5 code system. SLAC Report number: SLAC-R-730. KEK Report number: 2005-8; 2013.
Hubbell JH. Photon mass attenuation and energy-absorption coefficients from 1 keV to 20 MeV. Int J Appl Radiat Isot. 1982;33:1269–90.
ICRU report 47. Measurement of dose equivalents from external photon and electron radiations. Washington D.C.: International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements; 1992.
Ku HH. Note on the use of propagation of error formulas. J Res Natl Bur Stand C Eng Instrum. 1966;70(4):263–73.
Knoll GF. Radiation detection and measurement. 3rd ed. New York: Wiley; 1992. p. 48–64.
Storm E, Israel HI. Photon cross sections from 1 keV to 100 MeV for elements Z = 1 to Z = 100. Nucl Data Tables. 1970;A7:565–681.
Brooks RA, Chiro GD. Beam hardening in X-ray reconstructive tomography. Phys Med Biol. 1976;21(3):390–8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
T. Okazaki, T. Hashizume, and I. Kobayashi are employees of Nagase Landauer, Ltd., and are collaborating researchers.
About this article
Cite this article
Takegami, K., Hayashi, H., Okino, H. et al. Energy dependence measurement of small-type optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dosimeter by means of characteristic X-rays induced with general diagnostic X-ray equipment. Radiol Phys Technol 9, 99–108 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-015-0339-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-015-0339-9