Skip to main content
Log in

Long-term stability of beam quality and output of conventional X-ray units

  • Published:
Radiological Physics and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 28 August 2014

Abstract

Conventional diagnostic X-ray units are used for radiographic imaging in many countries. For obtaining entrance surface doses, a numerical dose determination method has been applied in Japan. Although this technique is effective, it has to account for errors, particularly fluctuations, due to the beam quality and output of X-ray tubes. As a part of our quality control procedures, we recorded the entrance surface air kerma, tube voltage, and half-value layer measurements made for four diagnostic X-ray tubes over a 103-week period. The entrance surface air kerma for one of the four X-ray tubes had increased significantly by 11.4 % over 1 year from its initial setting, whereas the tube voltages and half-value layers did not deviate significantly from their initial values. Medical physicists and radiological technologists should be aware of this fluctuation for diagnostic X-ray tubes and take it into consideration when calculating the entrance surface air kerma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. International Commission on Radiological Protection. 1990 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication no. 60. Oxford: Pergamon. 1991.

  2. International Commission on Radiological Protection. Radiological protection and safety in medicine. ICRP publication no. 73. Oxford: Pergamon. 1996.

  3. Gray JE, Archer BR, Butler PF, Hobbs BB, Mettler FA Jr, Pizzutiello RJ Jr, Schueler BA, Strauss KJ, Suleiman OH, Yaffe MJ. Reference values for diagnostic radiology: application and impact. Radiology. 2005;235:354–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. International Atomic Energy Agency. Radiation protection and safety of radiation sources: international basic safety standards—interim edition general safety requirements Part 3. Vienna. 2011.

  5. European Commission. Radiation Protection 109. Guidance on diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for medical exposures. Luxembourg: European Commission. 1999.

  6. Mori T, Muto H, Sato H, Hasegawa M. Medical exposures based on the survey of the X-ray technical conditions and the proposal of guidance level. Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi. 2000;60:389–95 (in Japanese).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fukuda A, Miyati T, Matsubara K. Where should we measure the entrance air kerma rate during acceptance testing of the automatic dose control of a fluoroscopic system? Radiol Phys Technol. 2013;6:313–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. JIS Z 4751-2-7. Medical electrical equipment-part 2–7: particular requirements for the safety of high-voltage generators of diagnostic X-ray generators. 2008 (in Japanese).

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they had no conflict of interest in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Atsushi Fukuda.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fukuda, A., Matsubara, K. & Miyati, T. Long-term stability of beam quality and output of conventional X-ray units. Radiol Phys Technol 8, 26–29 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-014-0282-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-014-0282-1

Keywords

Navigation