Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Comparative Study on the Level of Realizing Children’s Rights: A Focus on Rich Countries

  • Published:
Child Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The primary purposes of the paper is to construct a children’s rights index (CRI) for measuring the level of realizing children’s rights in economically rich countries and to compare the level of children’s rights across economically rich countries. We use three domains to represent children’s rights in advanced countries in order to measure children’s rights: right to welfare, right to education, and right to health. Each domain is composed of three types of indicators: public efforts, basic needs fulfillment, and present condition. In a comparative analysis, we found variations in children’s rights between economically rich countries. We also found that the patterns of children’s rights are highly achieved in an advanced welfare state. The results suggest that economic inequality is important for realizing children’s rights while the ratification of a human rights treaty has a limited effect on children’s rights. We conclude that governmental efforts to create an equal society are key factors for realizing children’s rights. Therefore, countries need to develop plans to confront economic inequality in order to achieve improved children’s rights for the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Our index is redefined from four types of rights into three types such as survival, protection, and development. However, we do not have indicators that represent participation rights. We reckon that a method to measure participation rights or how to select proxy indicators for participation rights is not clear. This is a critical limitation of this study.

  2. This relationship is possibly caused because we included the ‘child poverty rate indicator’ and the right to welfare domain. The child poverty rate is highly correlated with inequality. However, inequality is still correlated with other domains such as the right to health even stronger. Thus, we can conclude that inequality affects children’s rights and children’s well-being across economically advanced countries.

References

  • Archard, D. (2004). Children: Rights and childhood. Evanston: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Arieh, A. (2006). Is the study of the “state of our children” changing? Re-visiting after 5 years. Children and Youth Services Review, 28(7), 799–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Arieh, A. (2008). The child indicators movement: past, present, and future. Child Indicators Research, 1(1), 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Arieh, A., Kaufman, N. H., Andrews, A. B., Goerge, R. M., Lee, B. J., & Aber, J. L. (2001). Measuring and monitoring children’s well-being. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, E. H., & Kim, M. (2009). International human rights law, global economic reforms, and child survival and development rights outcomes. Law & Society Review, 43(3), 455–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, J. (2014). Overview: Social policies and child well-being. In Handbook of child well-being (pp. 2921–2943): Springer.

  • Bradshaw, J., & Richardson, D. (2009). An index of child well-being in Europe. Child Indicators Research, 2(3), 319–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, J., Hoelscher, P., Richardson, D. (2006). Comparing child wellbeing in OECD countries: Concepts and methods. Working Paper No. 2006–03. Florence.

  • Britto, P. R., & Ulkuer, N. (2012). Child development in developing countries: child rights and policy implications. Child Development, 83(1), 92–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clery, E., Tsang, T., & Vizard, P. (2014). The children’s measurement framework: a new indicator-based tool for monitoring children’s equality and human rights. Child Indicators Research, 7(2), 321–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ennew, J. (1998). Monitoring children’s rights: Indicators for children’s rights project. Childwatch International Research Network, Centre for Family Research, University of Cambridge, www.childwatch.uio.no/cwi/projects/indicators/monitoring/monitoring.html.

  • Ennew, J., & Miljeteig, P. (1996). Indicators for children’s rights: progress report on a project. The International Journal of Children’s Rights, 4, 213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism.

  • Esping-Andersen, G. (2005). Children in the welfare state. A social investment approach.

  • Gran, B. K. (2010). Comparing children’s rights: introducing the children’s rights index. The International Journal of Children’s Rights, 18(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammad, S. H. (1999). The CRC: ‘words on paper’ or a reality for children? The International Journal of Children’s Rights, 7(3), 215–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hathaway, O. A. (2002). Do human rights treaties make a difference? Yale Law Journal, 1935–2042.

  • HCCH (2014). Introduction HCCP. http://www.hcch.net. Accessed 30.11. 2014.

  • Hodgkin, R., & Newell, P. (2002). Implementation handbook for the convention on the rights of the child (Vol. 1): United Nations Publications.

  • Humanium (2013). Activity report 2013.

  • Landman, T. (2005). Protecting human rights: A comparative study, Georgetown University Press.

  • Lansdown, G. (2001). Promoting children’s participation in democratic decision-making. Innocenti Insight.

  • Lansdown, G. (2010). The realisation of children’s participation rights. A handbook of children and young people’s participation, 11.

  • Marshall, T. H. (1964). Class, citizenship and social development. New York.

  • Mekonen, Y. (2010). Measuring government performance in realising child rights and child wellbeing: the approach and indicators. Child Indicators Research, 3(2), 205–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2007). Health at a glance, OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD publishing.

  • OECD (2011a). Doing better for families. Paris: OECD Publishing.

  • OECD (2011b). Education at a glance 2011: OECD indicators. Paris: OECD publishing.

  • Reynaert, D., Bouverne-de-Bie, M., & Vandevelde, S. (2009). A review of children’s rights literature since the adoption of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. Childhood, 16(4), 518–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selman, P. (2014). Intercountry adoption of children from Asia in the twenty-first century. Children’s Geographies (ahead-of-print), 1–16.

  • Smolin, D. M. (2004). Two faces of intercountry adoption: the significance of the Indian adoption scandals. The Seton Hall Law Review, 35, 403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalford, H., Sax, H., & Drywood, E. (2009). Developing indicators for the protection, respect and promotion of the rights of the child in the European union. Summary Report European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights.

  • Theis, J. (2003). Rights-based monitoring and evaluation: A discussion paper. Save the Children, April.

  • Thukral, E. G., & Thukral, P. (2011). India child rights index. In H. C. f. C. Rights (Ed.). New Deli: HAQ: Center for Child Rights.

  • Turner, B. S. (1993). Contemporary problems in the theory of citizenship. Citizenship and social theory, 1–18.

  • UNICEF (1989). Convention on the rights of the child.

  • UNICEF (2002). UNICEF’s priorities for children 2002–2005.

  • UNICEF. (2004). Summary report of the study on the impact of the implementation of the convention on the rights of the child. Florence: UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNICEF Office of Research (2013). Child well-being in rich countries: A comparative overview innocenti report card 11. Florence: UNICEF Office of Research.

  • UNICEF (2014a). Convention on the rights of the child. http://www.unicef.org/crc/. Accessed 26.11. 2014.

  • UNICEF. (2014b). Is the world a better place for children? 25 years of the convention on the rights of the child. New York: Division of Communication, UNICEF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veerman, P., & Levine, H. (2000). Implementing children’s rights on a local level: narrowing the gap between Geneva and the grassroots. The International Journal of Children’s Rights, 8(4), 373–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wotipka, C. M., & Ramirez, F. O. (2008). World society and human rights: an event history analysis of the convention on the elimination of all forms of discrimination against women. The global diffusion of markets and democracy, 303–343.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Min Sang Yoo.

Additional information

An earlier version of this paper was presented at the Conference on Social Policy Association, July 14-16, 2014 and we thank participants at that conference for very helpful feedback, in particular, Jonathan Bradshaw and Gill Main. This research was supported by a grant from the Asan Foundation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, S.S., Yoo, M.S. A Comparative Study on the Level of Realizing Children’s Rights: A Focus on Rich Countries. Child Ind Res 9, 855–872 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-015-9344-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-015-9344-0

Keywords

Navigation