Skip to main content
Log in

Learning from Errors at Work: A Replication Study in Elder Care Nursing

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Vocations and Learning Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Learning from errors is an important way of learning at work. In this article, we analyse conditions under which elder care nurses use errors as a starting point for the engagement in social learning activities (ESLA) in the form of joint reflection with colleagues on potential causes of errors and ways to prevent them in future. The goal of our study was to investigate whether exploratory findings from an earlier study on hospital nurses’ ESLA (Bauer and Mulder Learning in Health and Social Care 6:121–133, 2011) replicate and generalise to the domain of elder care nursing. For this purpose, we surveyed a sample of N = 180 elder care nurses using vignette-based questionnaires. With these data, we tested a mediation model of nurses’ ESLA suggested by the earlier study. We firstly found a statistically significant indirect effect of error strain on ESLA that is completely mediated by the estimation of an error as relevant for learning (β = .16). Secondly, the perception of a safe social team climate at work has a statistically significant indirect effect on ESLA that is completely mediated by nurses’ tendency to cover up errors (β = .31). These results entirely cross-validate the exploratory findings of Bauer and Mulder (Learning in Health and Social Care 6:121–133, 2011) on hospital nurses’ ESLA and show that they generalise to the domain of elder care nursing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Complete mediation means that there is no direct effect of an independent on a dependent variable, beyond the indirect effect via the mediator; if there is a significant indirect and an additional direct effect of an independent on a dependent variable, then there is evidence of partial mediation (MacKinnon et al. 2007).

  2. There are major differences in the work of employees between in-patient and home care organisations in Germany.

References

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behaviour. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arndt, M. (1996). Aus Fehlern lernen [Learning from errors]. Pflege, 9, 12–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, J., & Mulder, R. H. (2007). Modelling learning from errors in daily work. Learning in Health and Social Care, 6, 121–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, J., & Mulder, R. H. (2011). Engagement in learning after errors at work: enabling conditions and types of engagement. Journal of Education and Work. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/13639080.2011.573776.

  • Bauer, J., Gartmeier, M., & Harteis, C. (2012). Human fallibility and learning from errors at work. In J. Bauer & C. Harteis (Eds.), Human fallibility: The ambiguity of errors for work and learning (pp. 1–14). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Berings, M. G. M. C., Poell, R. F., & Van Veldhoven, M. J. (2010). Antecedents of nurses’ on-the-job learning. In M. J. van Woerkom & R. F. Poell (Eds.), Workplace learning: Concepts, measurement and application (pp. 71–87). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billett, S. (2004). Workplace participatory practices. Conceptualising workplaces as learning environments. Journal of Workplace Learning, 16, 312–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boshuizen, H. P. A., Bromme, R., & Gruber, H. (Eds.). (2004). Professional learning: Gaps and transitions on the way from novice to expert. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon, M., & Edmondson, A. C. (2001). Confronting failure: antecedents and consequences of shared beliefs about failure in organizational work groups. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 161–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collin, K., Paloniemi, S., & Mecklin, J.-P. (2010). Promoting inter-professional teamwork and learning - the case of a surgical operating theatre. Journal of Education and Work, 23(1), 43–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, A. C. (1996). Learning from mistakes is easier said than done: group and organisational influences on the detection and correction of human error. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 32, 5–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, A. C. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behaviour in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 350–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, A. C. (2004). Learning from errors in health care: frequent opportunities, pervasive barriers. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 13(6), 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eraut, M., Alderton, J., Cole, G., & Senker, P. (1998). Development of knowledge and skills in employment (Research Report No. 5). Sussex: University of Sussex, Institute of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frese, M., & Zapf, D. (1994). Action as a core of work psychology: A German approach. In H. C. Triandis, M. D. Dunette, & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 271–340). Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartmeier, M., Bauer, J., Gruber, H., & Heid, H. (2010b). Workplace errors and negative knowledge in elder care nursing. Human Resource Development International, 13(1), 5–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gartmeier, M., Gruber, H., & Heid, H. (2010a). Tracing error–related knowledge in interview data: negative knowledge in elder care nursing. Educational Gerontology, 36, 733–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glendon, I., Clarke, S. G., & Mc Kenna, E. F. (2006). Human safety and risk management. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, H. (2001). Acquisition of expertise. In J. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (pp. 5145–5150). Oxford: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Harteis, C., Bauer, J., & Gruber, H. (2008). The culture of learning from mistakes: how employees handle mistakes in everyday work. International Journal of Educational Research, 4, 223–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, D. A., & Frese, M. (2011). Errors in organizations. New York: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keith, N., & Frese, M. (2005). Self regulation in error management training: emotion, control and metacognition as mediators of performance effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 677–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R. B. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, D. P., Fairchild, A. J., & Fritz, M. S. (2007). Mediation analysis. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 593–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meurier, C. E. (2000). Understanding the nature of errors in nursing: using a model to analyse critical incident reports of errors which had resulted in an adverse or potentially adverse event. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32, 202–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meurier, C. E., Vincent, C. A., & Parmar, D. G. (1997). Learning from errors in nursing practice. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 26, 111–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oser, F., & Spychiger, M. (2005). Lernen ist schmerzhaft [Learning is painful]. Weinheim: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeiffer, Y., & Wehner, T. (2012). Incident reporting systems in hospitals: How does learning occur using this organisational instrument? In J. Bauer & C. Harteis (Eds.), Human fallibility: The ambiguity of errors for work and learning (pp. 255–266). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putz, D., Schilling, J., & Kluge, A. (2012). Measuring organizational climate for learning from errors at work. In J. Bauer & C. Harteis (Eds.), Human fallibility: The ambiguity of errors for work and learning (pp. 107–123). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, J. (1987). Cognitive control and human error mechanisms. In J. Rasmussen, K. Duncan, & J. Leplat (Eds.), New technology and human error (pp. 53–60). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rausch, A. (2011). Errors, emotions, and learning in the workplace. In E. Wuttke & J. Seifried (Eds.), Learning from errors at school and at work (pp. 111–126). Opladen: Barbara Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason, J. T. (1990). Human error. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reason, J. T. (1995). Understanding adverse events: human factors. Quality in Health Care, 4, 80–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, D. H., & Levin, J. R. (1997). Reflections on statistical and substantive significance, with a slice of replication. Educational Researcher, 26, 21–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rost, J. (2004). Lehrbuch Testtheorie - Testkonstruktion [Test theory and test construction]. Bern: Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rybowiak, V., Garst, H., Frese, M., & Batinic, B. (1999). Error Orientation Questionnaire (EOQ): reliability, validity, and different language equivalence. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 527–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senders, J. W., & Moray, N. P. (1991). Human error. Cause, prediction, and reduction. Hillsdale: LEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shavelson, R. J., & Towne, L. (2002). Scientific research in education. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tjosvold, D., Yu, Z.-Y., & Hui, C. (2004). Team learning from mistakes: the contribution of cooperative goals and problem solving. Journal of Management Studies, 41, 1223–1245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, A., & Edmondson, A. C. (2003). Why hospitals don’t learn from failures: organizational and psychological dynamics that inhibit system change. California Management Review, 45, 55–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tynjälä, P. (2008). Perspectives into learning at the workplace. Educational Research Review, 3(1), 130–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dyck, C., Frese, M., Baer, M., & Sonnentag, S. (2005). Organizational error management culture and its impact on performance: a two-study replication. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1228–1240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wuttke, E., & Seifried, J. (2011). Learning from errors at school and at work. Opladen: Barbara Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, B. (2011). Learning from errors: the role of context, emotion, and personality. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32, 435–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, B., & Olivera, F. (2006). Error reporting in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 1012–1030.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Veronika Leicher.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leicher, V., Mulder, R.H. & Bauer, J. Learning from Errors at Work: A Replication Study in Elder Care Nursing. Vocations and Learning 6, 207–220 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-012-9090-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-012-9090-0

Keywords

Navigation