Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors in chronic myeloid leukemia: experience from a west Asian developing country

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Hematology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tyrosine Kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have dramatically changed the prospects for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML); however, information on CML and response to TKIs from Asia are limited, particularly from West Asia, including Iraq. To address the latter issue we evaluated and monitored a cohort of 108 Iraqi patients diagnosed as chronic phase-CML, enrolled in a government-sponsored national program. The patients were all treated initially by imatinib mesylate. Ninety-two percent of patients had a complete hematological response, 38 % had a major molecular response, while 79 % had a major cytogenetic response after a median follow-up of 35.7 months. The 3-year Event-Free, Progression-Free, and Overall survival rates were 79.6, 87 and 98.1 %, respectively. A total of 26 patients (24.1 %) were shifted to an alternative TKI (Nilotinib). After one year of therapy in seventeen of the latter patients, 24 % had major molecular response. In conclusion, our results compare favorably with those reported from the West and some Asian countries, and have demonstrated the importance of molecular as well as cytogenetic monitoring, and confirmed the relative success of the national CML program in our country.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Melo JV, Hughes TP, Apperley JF. Chronic myeloid leukemia. ASH hematology. 2003:132–52.

  2. Kantarjian H, Sawyers C, Hochhaus A, Guilhot F, Schiffer C, Gambacorti-Passerini C, et al. Hematologic and cytogenetic responses to Imatinib mesylate in chronic myelogenous leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(9):645–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sokal JE, Cox EB, Baccarani M, Tuna S, Gomez GA, Robertson JE, et al. Prognostic discrimination in “good-risk” chronic granulocytic leukemia. Blood. 1984;63(4):789–99.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hasford J, Pfirrmann M, Hehlmann R, et al. A new prognostic score for survival of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia treated with interferon alfa: writing committee for the Collaborative CML Prognostic Factors Project Group. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998;90(11):850–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hasford J, Baccarani M, Hoffmann V, et al. Predicting complete cytogenetic response and subsequent progression-free survival in 2060 patients with CML on Imatinib treatment: the EUTOS score. Blood. 2011;118(3):686–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Baccarani M, Castagnetti F, Gugliotta G, Palandri F, Rosti G. Treatment recommendations for chronic myeloid leukemia. Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis. 2014;6(1):e20149005. doi:10.4084/MJHID.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jabbour E, Cortes JE, Kanatarjian HM. Molecular monitoring in chronic myeloid leukemia. Cancer. 2008;112:2112–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Au WY, Caguioa PB, Chuah C, Hsu SC, Jootar S, Kim D-W, et al. Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Asia. Int J Hematol. 2009;89:14–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Vardiman JW, Pierre R, Thiele J. Chronic myelogenous leukemia. In: Jaffe ES, editor. Harris NL. Stein H: Vardiman JW. World Health Organization classification of tumors. Pathology and genetics tumors of haemopoietic and lymphoid tissues. IARC Press; 2001. p. 20–6.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kantarjian HM, O’Brien S, Cortes J, et al. Imatinib mesylate therapy improves survival in patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myelogenous leukemia in the chronic phase. Cancer. 2003;98:2636–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cortes J. Natural history and staging of chronic myeloid leukemia. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2004;18:569–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Talpaz M, Silver RT, Druker BJ, et al. Imatinib induces durable hematologic and cytogenetic responses in patients with accelerated phase chronic myeloid leukemia: result of phase 2 study. Blood. 2002;99:1928–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Goldman JM. How I treat chronic myeloid leukemia in the Imatinib era. Blood. 2007;110:2828–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Baccarani M, Deininger W, Rosti G, Andreas H, Soverini S, Jane F. European Leukemia Net recommendations for the management of chronic myeloid leukemia: 2013. Blood. 2013;122:872–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. O’Brien SG, Guilhot F, Goldman JM, et al. International Randomized Study of Interferon Versus STI571 (IRIS) 7-year follow-up: sustained survival, low rate of transformation and increased rate of major molecular response in patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase treated with Imatinib. Blood. 2008;112:76.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Champagne MA, Fu CH, Chang M, et al. Higher dose Imatinib for children with de novo chronic phase chronic myelogenous leukemia: a report from the Children’s Oncology Group. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2011;57:56–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cortes JE, Talpaz M, Giles F, et al. Prognostic significance of cytogenetic clonal evolution in patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia on Imatinib mesylate therapy. Blood. 2003;101:3794–800.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Matti BF, Naji AS, Alwan AF. Evaluation of the safety of Imatinib mesylate in 200 Iraqi patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in the chronic phase: single center study. Turkish J Hematol. 2013;30:387–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dhahii MAR, Murad NS, Matti BF. Evaluation of molecular response to Imatinib in Iraqi Chronic Myeloid leukemia patients using real time–Reverse Transcriptase-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT–RT-PCR)—Taqman assay. J Mol Biol Res. 2011;1(1):47–54.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jabbour E, Cortes J, Nazha A, O’Brien S, Quintas A, Pierce S, Garcia G, Kantarjian H. EUTOS score is not predictive for survival and outcome in patients with early chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors: a single institution experience. Blood. 2012;119(19):4524–4526.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Than H, Kuan L, Seow CH, Li W, John C, Chuah C. The EUTOS Score is highly predictive for clinical outcome and survival in Asian patients with early chronic phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia treated with Imatinib. Leukemia. 2012;26:2061–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bilen Y, Erdem F. Hematologic, cytogenetic, and molecular responses to Imatinib therapy for chronic myeloid leukemia: a single-center experience in Turkey. Turk J Med Sci. 2012;42(1):31–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Gugliotta G, Castagnetti F, Palandri F, et al. Frontline Imatinib treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia: no impact of age on outcome, a survey by the GIMEMA CML working party. Blood. 2011;117(21):5591–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sacha T. Imatinib in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: an overview. Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis. 2014;6(1):e2014007. doi:10.4084/MJHID.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lahaye T, Riehm B, Berger U, Paschka P, Müller M, Kreil S, et al. Response and resistance in 300 patients with BCR-ABL–Positive Leukemias treated with Imatinib in a single center. Cancer. 2005;103:1659–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Cortes JE, Talpaz M, O’Brien S, et al. Staging of chronic myeloid leukemia in the Imatinib era: an evaluation of the World Health Organization proposal. Cancer. 2006;106(6):1306–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Deshmukh C, Saikia T, Bakshi A, et al. Imatinib mesylate in chronic myeloid leukemia: a prospective, single arm, nonrandomized study. J Assoc Physicians India. 2005;53:291–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Baccarani M, Cortes J, Pane F, et al. Chronic myeloid leukemia: an update of concepts and management recommendations of European LeukemiaNet. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:6041–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Saglio G, Kim DW, Issaragrisil S, et al. Nilotinib versus Imatinib for newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(24):2251–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Cervantes F, Lopez-Garrido P, Montero MI, et al. Early intervention during Imatinib therapy on patients with newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia: a study of the Spanish PETHEMA group. Haematologica. 2010;95(8):1317–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Jiang H, Chen SS, Jiang B, Jiang Q, Qin YZ, Lai YY, et al. Seven-year response to Imatinib as initial treatment versus re-treatment in Chinese patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia in the chronic phase. Ann Hematol. 2011;90(1):41–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Quintas-Cardama A, Kantarjian H, Jones D, et al. Delayed achievement of cytogenetic and molecular response is associated with increased risk of progression among patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in early chronic phase receiving high-dose or standard dose Imatinib therapy. Blood. 2009;113:6315–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kantarjian H, Giles F, Bhalla K, et al. Nilotinib is effective in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase after Imatinib resistance or intolerance: 24-month follow-up results. Blood. 2011;117(4):1141–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Young Choi S, Eun Lee S, Jeong Oh Y, Hyun Kim S, Woodman R, Szczudlo T, et al. Nilotinib Or High-Dose Imatinib compared with standard-dose imatinib in early chronic phase cml patients who have suboptimal molecular responses to standard-dose imatinib: including updated data from re-nice study. Blood. 2013;38:432–42.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Dasgupta S, Mukhopadhyay A, Mukhopadhyay S, Sarkar S, Gharami F, Koner K, Basak J, et al. Imatinib Mesylate Therapy in patients of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia with Philadelphia Chromosome Positive. An experience from Eastern India. Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2012;28(2):82–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Faber E, Muzik J, Koza V, et al. Treatment of consecutive patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia in the cooperating centres from the Czech Republic and the whole of Slovakia after 2002—a report from the population-based CAMELIA registry. Eur J Haematol. 2011;87(2):157–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammed Dhahir Ali.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ali, M.D., Badi, A.I., Al-Zebari, S.S.M. et al. Response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors in chronic myeloid leukemia: experience from a west Asian developing country. Int J Hematol 100, 274–280 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12185-014-1627-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12185-014-1627-6

Keywords

Navigation