Skip to main content
Log in

Acute myeloid leukemia in clinical practice: a retrospective population-based cohort study in Miyazaki Prefecture, Japan

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Hematology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We performed a retrospective population-based cohort study of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in Miyazaki Prefecture, Japan. Over 6 years, we diagnosed 221 patients (211 adults and 10 children) with AML, indicating an incidence of AML in Miyazaki Prefecture of 3.2 per 100,000 per year. In 193 adult patients with non-acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), the proportion of patients with myelodysplasia, unfavorable risk karyotypes, antecedent hematologic diseases, prior chemotherapy for other malignancies, and small proportion of blasts in the marrow was higher in patients ≥65 years, and patients with poor performance status (PS) and higher WBC counts at diagnosis were more prevalent among patients ≥75 years. One-third of the adult non-APL patients met the inclusion criteria usually applied in clinical trials: de novo AML, age ≤64 years with PS 0–2 and no key organ dysfunction. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate of adult non-APL patients was 21.1 % (patients ≤64 years, 33.8 %; 65–74 years, 21.6 %; ≥75 years, 0 %). Multivariate analysis revealed that French-American-British subtypes M0, M6, and M7, poor PS (3, 4), unfavorable risk karyotypes, and higher WBC counts at diagnosis were independent adverse prognostic factors associated with OS. This analysis provides real world data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ohtake S, Miyawaki S, Fujita H, Kiyoi H, Shinagawa K, Usui N, Okumura H, Miyamura K, Nakaseko C, Miyazaki Y, Fujieda A, Nagai T, Yamane T, Taniwaki M, Takahashi M, Yagasaki F, Kimura Y, Asou N, Sakamaki H, Handa H, Honda S, Ohnishi K, Naoe T, Ohno R. Randomized study of induction therapy comparing standard-dose idarubicin with high-dose daunorubicin in adult patients with previously untreated acute leukemia: the JALSG AML201 Study. Blood. 2011;117:2358–65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Burnett AK. The treatment of AML: current status and novel approaches. Hematology. 2005;10(Suppl 1):50–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hutchins LF, Unger JM, Crowley JJ, Coltman CA, Albain KS. Underrepresentation of patients 65 years of age or older in cancer-treatment trials. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:2061–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mauritzson N, Johansson B, Albin M, Billstrom R, Ahlgren T, Mikoczy Z, et al. A single-center population-based consecutive series of 1500 cytogenetically investigated adult hematological malignancies: karyotypic features in relation to morphology, age and gender. Eur J Haematol. 1999;62:95–102.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Juliusson G, Antunovic P, Derolf A, Lehmann S, Mollgard L, Stockelberg D, et al. Age and acute myeloid leukemia: real world data on decision to treat and outcomes from the Swedish Acute Leukemia Registry. Blood. 2009;113:4179–87.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Taylor PR, Reid MM, Stark AN, Bown N, Hamilton PJ, Proctor SJ. De novo acute myeloid leukaemia in patients over 55-years-old: a population-based study of incidence, treatment and outcome. Northern Region Haematology Group. Leukemia. 1995;9:231–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bhayat F, Das-Gupta E, Smith C, McKeever T, Hubbard R. The incidence of and mortality from leukaemias in the UK: a general population-based study. BMC Cancer. 2009;9:252.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Phekoo KJ, Richards MA, Moller H, Schey SA. The incidence and outcome of myeloid malignancies in 2,112 adult patients in southeast England. Haematologica. 2006;91:1400–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pulte D, Gondos A, Brenner H. Improvements in survival of adults diagnosed with acute myeloblastic leukemia in the early 21st century. Haematologica. 2008;93:594–600.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nakase K, Bradstock K, Sartor M, Gottlieb D, Byth K, Kita K, et al. Geographic heterogeneity of cellular characteristics of acute myeloid leukemia: a comparative study of Australian and Japanese adult cases. Leukemia. 2000;14:163–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. NCCN. Guideline. http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/f_guidelines.asp. Accessed Aug 28 2010.

  12. BCSH. Guidelines. http://www.bcshguidelines.com/guidelinesMENU.asp. Accessed Aug 28 2010.

  13. Grimwade D, Walker H, Oliver F, Wheatley K, Harrison C, Harrison G, et al. The importance of diagnostic cytogenetics on outcome in AML: analysis of 1,612 patients entered into the MRC AML 10 trial. The Medical Research Council Adult and Children’s Leukaemia Working Parties. Blood. 1998;92:2322–33.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Slovak ML, Kopecky KJ, Cassileth PA, Harrington DH, Theil KS, Mohamed A, et al. Karyotypic analysis predicts outcome of preremission and postremission therapy in adult acute myeloid leukemia: a Southwest Oncology Group/Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study. Blood. 2000;96:4075–83.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Byrd JC, Mrozek K, Dodge RK, Carroll AJ, Edwards CG, Arthur DC, et al. Pretreatment cytogenetic abnormalities are predictive of induction success, cumulative incidence of relapse, and overall survival in adult patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia: results from Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB 8461). Blood. 2002;100:4325–36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cox D. Logistic regression for binary response variables. London: Champman & Hall; 1989. p. 33–43.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Grambsch PTT. Proportional hazard tests and diagnostic based on weighted residuals. Biometrika. 1994;81:515–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. SEER. Cancer statistics review 1975–2006. http://seer.cancer.gov. Accessed Aug 28 2010.

  19. Asou N, Adachi K, Tamura J, Kanamaru A, Kageyama S, Hiraoka A, et al. Analysis of prognostic factors in newly diagnosed acute promyelocytic leukemia treated with all-trans retinoic acid and chemotherapy. Japan Adult Leukemia Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16:78–85.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sanz MA, Vellenga E, Rayon C, Diaz-Mediavilla J, Rivas C, Amutio E, et al. All-trans retinoic acid and anthracycline monochemotherapy for the treatment of elderly patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia. Blood. 2004;104:3490–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Appelbaum FR, Gundacker H, Head DR, Slovak ML, Willman CL, Godwin JE, et al. Age and acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2006;107:3481–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Grimwade D, Walker H, Harrison G, Oliver F, Chatters S, Harrison CJ, et al. The predictive value of hierarchical cytogenetic classification in older adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML): analysis of 1065 patients entered into the United Kingdom Medical Research Council AML11 trial. Blood. 2001;98:1312–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Moorman AV, Roman E, Willett EV, Dovey GJ, Cartwright RA, Morgan GJ. Karyotype and age in acute myeloid leukemia. Are they linked? Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2001;126:155–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Schoch C, Kern W, Krawitz P, Dugas M, Schnittger S, Haferlach T, et al. Dependence of age-specific incidence of acute myeloid leukemia on karyotype. Blood. 2001;98:3500.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ferrara F, Annunziata M, Copia C, Magrin S, Mele G, Mirto S. Therapeutic options and treatment results for patients over 75 years of age with acute myeloid leukemia. Haematologica. 1998;83:126–31.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Iwakiri R, Ohta M, Mikoshiba M, Tsutsumi H, Kumakawa T, Mori M. Prognosis of elderly patients with acute myelogenous leukemia: analysis of 126 AML cases. Int J Hematol. 2002;75:45–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Erba HP. Prognositic factors in elderly patients with AML and the implications for treatment. In: American Society of Hematology Education Program Book; 2007. p. 420–428.

  28. Zittoun RA, Mandelli F, Willemze R, de Witte T, Labar B, Resegotti L, et al. Autologous or allogeneic bone marrow transplantation compared with intensive chemotherapy in acute myelogenous leukemia. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and the Gruppo Italiano Malattie Ematologiche Maligne dell’Adulto (GIMEMA) Leukemia Cooperative Groups. N Engl J Med. 1995;332:217–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Burnett AK, Wheatley K, Goldstone AH, Stevens RF, Hann IM, Rees JH, et al. The value of allogeneic bone marrow transplant in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia at differing risk of relapse: results of the UK MRC AML 10 trial. Br J Haematol. 2002;118:385–400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sakamaki H, Miyawaki S, Ohtake S, Emi N, Yagasaki F, Mitani K, et al. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation versus chemotherapy as post-remission therapy for intermediate or poor risk adult acute myeloid leukemia: results of the JALSG AML97 study. Int J Hematol. 2010;91:284–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Miyawaki S, Ohtake S, Fujisawa S, Kiyoi H, Shinagawa K, Usui N, et al. A randomized comparison of 4 courses of standard-dose multiagent chemotherapy versus 3 courses of high-dose cytarabine alone in postremission therapy for acute myeloid leukemia in adults: the JALSG AML201 Study. Blood. 2011;117:2366–72

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We appreciate the work of data manager and statistical support from Mrs. Mayumi Ebihara and Mrs. Keiko Toyama of Miyazaki University, and Mrs. Rie Nitawaki of Kagawa University.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing financial interests in relation to this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kazuya Shimoda.

Additional information

T. Matsunaga, K. Yamashita, Y. Kubuki, T. Toyama, and O. Imataki contributed equally to this work.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

12185_2012_1146_MOESM1_ESM.tif

Supplemental Fig. 1. Negative correlation between performance status and intensity of induction chemotherapy in 108 non-acute promyelocytic leukemia patients aged ≥ 65 years. No shading, intensive chemotherapy; gray shading, less intensive chemotherapy; black shading, best supportive care (TIFF 60 kb)

12185_2012_1146_MOESM2_ESM.tif

Supplemental Fig. 2. Kaplan–Meier estimate of overall survival in 46 non-acute promyelocytic leukemia patients aged ≥ 70 years with PS 0–2 categorized by intensity of induction chemotherapy. Black line, intensive chemotherapy; gray line, less intensive chemotherapy (TIFF 59 kb)

Supplemental Table 1 (TIFF 71 kb)

About this article

Cite this article

Matsunaga, T., Yamashita, K., Kubuki, Y. et al. Acute myeloid leukemia in clinical practice: a retrospective population-based cohort study in Miyazaki Prefecture, Japan. Int J Hematol 96, 342–349 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12185-012-1146-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12185-012-1146-2

Keywords

Navigation