Skip to main content
Log in

Koronarintervention jetzt auch (wieder) bei Hauptstammstenose!

Oder doch nicht?

Coronary intervention now also (again) for main stem stenosis!

Or perhaps not?

  • Journal Club
  • Published:
Der Kardiologe Aims and scope

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1

Literatur

  1. Morice MC, Serruys PW, Kappetein AP, Feldman TE, Ståhle E, Colombo A, Mack MJ, Holmes DR, Choi JW, Ruzyllo W, Religa G, Huang J, Roy K, Dawkins KD, Mohr F (2014) Five-year outcomes in patients with left main disease treated with either percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting in the synergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with taxus and cardiac surgery trial. Circulation 129(23):2388–2394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cavalcante R, Sotomi Y, Lee CW, Ahn JM, Farooq V, Tateishi H, Tenekecioglu E, Zeng Y, Suwannasom P, Collet C, Albuquerque FN, Onuma Y, Park SJ, Serruys PW (2016) Outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention or bypass surgery in patients with unprotected left main disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 68(10):999–1009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Eggebrecht.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

H. Eggebrecht gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Eggebrecht, H. Koronarintervention jetzt auch (wieder) bei Hauptstammstenose!. Kardiologe 11, 78–80 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12181-016-0116-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12181-016-0116-y

Navigation