Abstract
Disability is commonly viewed as a problem that exists in a person’s body and requires medical treatment. The social model of disability, by contrast, distinguishes between impairment and disability, identifying the latter as a disadvantage that stems from a lack of fit between a body and its social environment. This paper describes the social model of disability and then considers how it might deal with chronic disease or impairment and why medical professionals should learn about disability perspectives to improve their practice.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Silvers A. A fatal attraction to normalizing. In: Parens, editor. Enhancing human traits. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press; 1998. p. 95–123.
Crow C. Including all of our lives. In: Morris, editor. Encounters with strangers. London: The Women’s Press Ltd; 1996. quote from p. 208.
Morris J, editor. Encounters with strangers: feminism and disability. London: The Women’s Press Ltd.; 1996.
Mairs N. Waist-high in the world: a life among the nondisabled. Boston: Beacon; 1996.
Hockenberry J. Moving violations: war zones, wheelchairs, and declarations of independence. New York: Hyperion; 1996.
Wendell S. The rejected body. New York: Routledge; 1996.
Keith L. Encounters with strangers. In: Morris, editor. Encounters with strangers. London: The Women’s Press; 1996. quote p. 71.
Oliver M. Understanding disability: from theory to practice. New York: St. Martin’s Press; 1996.
Silvers A. On the possibility and desirability of constructing a neutral conception of disability. Theor Med. 2003;24:471–87.
Kent D. Somewhere a Mockingbird. In: Parens, Asch, editors. Prenatal testing and disability rights. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press; 2000. p. 57–63.
Silvers A. A fatal attraction to normalizing. In: Parens, editor. Enhancing human traits. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press; 1998.
Wendell S. Unhealthy disabled: treating chronic illnesses as disability. Hypatia. 2001;16(4):17–33.
Thomas C. Female forms: experiencing and understanding disability. Buckingham: Open University Press; 1999.
Campbell F. Medical education and disability studies. J Med Human. 2009;30(4):221–35.
Evans J. Why the medical model needs disability studies (and Vice Versa). Disabil Stud Q. 2004;24(4).
Switzer J. Disabled rights: American disability policy and the fight for equality. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press; 2003.
Kirschner K. Rethinking anger and advocacy in bioethics. Am J Bioeth. 2001;1(3):60–2.
Eddey G, Robey K. Considering the culture of disability in cultural competence education. Acad Med. 2005;80:706–21.
Garland Thomson R. The case for conserving disability. J Bioeth Inq. 2012;9:339–55.
McBryde Johnson H. Too late to die young. New York: Henry Holt & Co; 2005.
Parens E. The fragility of goodness. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1995;5(2):141–53.
Compliance with Ethics Guidelines
Conflict of Interest
Sara Goering declares that she has no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Ethics
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Goering, S. Rethinking disability: the social model of disability and chronic disease. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 8, 134–138 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-015-9273-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-015-9273-z