Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Management of proximal humerus fractures utilizing reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The increased incidence of proximal humerus fractures has resulted in a thoughtful evolution of treatment options in order to optimize clinical outcomes. Complex three- and four-part fractures present a treatment challenge, particularly in elderly patients with significant medial comorbidities and poor bone quality. While open reduction and internal fixation is a reasonable surgical option in some patients with acceptable bone quality and simple fracture patterns that are not susceptible to avascular necrosis, shoulder hemiarthroplasty is a well-established procedure for many elderly patients (i.e., >70 years). Historically, hemiarthroplasty has provided reliable pain relief, but outcomes with regard to function, motion, and strength have varied. Ultimately, successful outcomes are dependent upon tuberosity healing, since an intact rotator cuff is required to restore function. With the advent of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) and increased familiarity with the surgical technique, successful outcomes have been achieved in older patients with poor potential for tuberosity healing. In this review, we discuss the recent role of RTSA in the setting of proximal humerus fractures, including surgical indications, preferred operative technique, and recent literature that supports its use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance•• Of major importance

  1. Palvanen M, Kannus P, Niemi S, Parkkari J. Update in the epidemiology of proximal humerus fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;442:87–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kannus P, Palvanen M, Niemi S, Parkkari J, Jarvinen M, Vuori I. Osteoporotic fractures of the proximal humerus in elderly Finnish persons: sharp increase in 1970–1998 and alarming projections for the new millennium. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000;71(5):465–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Court-Brown CM, Garg A, McQueen MM. The epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures. Acta Orthop Scand. 2001;72:365–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Owsley KC, Gorczyca JT. Displcament/screw cutout after open reduction and locked plate fixation of humeral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:233–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Solberg BD, Moon CN, Franco DP, Paiement GD. Surgical treatment of three and four part-part proximal humeral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:1689–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hertel R, Hempfing A, Stiehler M, Leunig M. Predictors of humeral head ischemia after intracapsular fracture of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2004;13(4):427–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee CW, Shin CJ. Prognostic factors for unstable proximal humeral fractures treated with locking plate fixation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009;18:83–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zyto K, Ahrengart L, Sperber A, Tornkvist H. Treatment of displaced proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997;79:412–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Neer 2nd CS. Displaced proximal humeral fractures. Part II. Treatment of three-part and four-part displacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1970;52:1090–103.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Antuna SA, Sperling JW, Cofield RH. Shoulder hemiarthroplasty for acute fractures of the proximal humerus: a minimum five-year follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008;17:202–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Boileau P, Krishnan SG, Tinsi L, Walch G, Coste JS, Mole D. Tuberosity malposition and migration: reasons for poor outcomes after hemiarthroplasty for displaced fractures of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002;11:401–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Becker R, Pap G, Machner A, Neumann WH. Strength and motion after hemiarthroplasty in displaced four-fragment fracture of the proximal humerus: 27 patients followed for 1–6 years. Acta Orthop Scand. 2002;73:44–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Goldman RT, Koval KJ, Cuomo F, Gallagher MA, Zuckerman JD. Functional outcomes after humeral head replacement for acute three- and four-part proximal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1995;4:81–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hawkins RJ, Switlyk P. Acute prosthetic replacement for sever fractures of the proximal humerus. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;289:156–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mighell MA, Kolm GP, Collinge CA, Frankle MA. Outcomes of hemiarthroplasty for fractures of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2003;12:569–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Robinson CM, Page RS, Hill RM, Sanders DL, Court-Brown CM, Wakefield AE. Primary hemiarthroplasty for treatment of proximal humeral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:1215–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Loebenberg MI, Jones DA, Zuckerman JD. The effect of greater tuberosity placement on active range of motion after hemiarthroplasty for acute fractures of the proximal humerus. Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 2005;62(3–4):90–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Greiner SH, Diedrichs G, Kroning I, Scheibel M, Perka C. Tuberosity position correlates with fatty infiltration of the rotator cuff after hemiarthroplasty for proximal humerus fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009;18(3):431–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Boileau P, Watkinson D, Hatzidakis AM, Balg F. Grammont reverse prosthesis: design, rationale, and biomechanics. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005;14(Suppl S):147S–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bufquin T, Hersan A, Hubert L, Massin P. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus in the elderly: a prospective review of 43 cases with a short-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89(4):516–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kralinger F, Schwaiger R, Wambacher M, Farrell E, Menth-Chiari W, Latjai G, et al. Outcome after primary hemiarthroplasty for fracture of the head of the humerus. A retrospective multicentre study of 167 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86(2):217–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Amirfeyz R, Sarangi P. Shoulder hemiarthroplasty for fracture with a conservative rehabilitation regime. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2008;128:985–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Visser CP, Coene LN, Brand R, Tavy DL. Nerve lesions in proximal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2001;10:421–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lenarz C, Shishani Y, McCrum C, Nowinski RJ, Edwards TB, Gobezie R. Is reverse shoulder arthroplasty appropriate for the treatment of fractures in the older patient? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:3324–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. • Cazeneuve JF, Cristofari DJ. The reverse shoulder prosthesis in the treatment of fractures of the proximal humerus in the elderly. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;92(4):535–9. This study reports medium to long-term outcomes (mean 6.6 years) following the use of RTSA for complex proximal humerus fractures using both objective clinical scores and radiological assessment. Overall outcomes declined with expanded follow-up; however, this study utilized older prosthetic designs. Long-term follow-up with new and improved designs is necessary to determine the precise role of RTSA for fracture.

  26. Gallinet D, Clappaz P, Garbuio P, Tropet Y, Obert L. Three or four parts complex proximal humerus fractures: Hemiarthroplasty versus reverse prosthesis: A comparative study of 40 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009;95:48–55.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. •• Gallinet D, Adam A, Gasse N, Rochet S, Obert L. Improvement in shoulder rotation in complex shoulder fractures treated by reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013;22(1):38–44. This study provides evidence to support routine surgical reconstruction of the greater and lesser tuberosities to improve postoperative motion. Patients with anatomic reconstruction demonstrated increased external rotation and improved validated outcome scores.

  28. Boileau P, Chuinard C, Le Huec JC, Walch G, Trojani C. Proximal humerus fracture sequelae: impact of a new radiographic classification on arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;442:121–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kilic M, Berth A, Blatter G, Fuhrmann U, Gebhardt K, Rott O, et al. Anatomic and reverse shoulder prostheses in fracture sequelae of the humeral head. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2010;44(6):417–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Willis M, Min W, Brooks JP, Mulieri P, Walker M, Pupello D, et al. Proximal humeral malunion treated with reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012;21:507–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Boileau P, Trojani C, Walch G, Krishnan SG, Romeo A, Sinnerton R. Shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of the sequelae of fractures of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2001;10:299–308.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Levy J, Frankle M, Mighell M, Pupello D. The use of the reverse shoulder prosthesis for the treatment of failed hemiarthroplasty for proximal humeral fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(2):292–300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lollino N, Paladini P, Campi F, Merolla G, Rossi P, Porcellini G. Reverse shoulder prosthesis as revision surgery after fractures of the proximal humerus, treated initially by internal fixation or hemiarthroplasty. Musculoskelet Surg. 2009;93:S35–9.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosure

K. J. Jones: none; D. M. Dines: Board Member and Treasurer, Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, consultant to Tornier, BioMimetics, receives royalties from Bimet; L. Gulotta: none; J. S. Dines: consultant to BioMimetics, Conmed Linvatec, Tornier Sports Medicine.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kristofer J. Jones.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jones, K.J., Dines, D.M., Gulotta, L. et al. Management of proximal humerus fractures utilizing reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 6, 63–70 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-013-9155-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-013-9155-1

Keywords

Navigation