Skip to main content
Log in

Development and Validation of Analytical Method for Clenbuterol Chiral Determination in Animal Feed by Direct Liquid Chromatography

  • Published:
Food Analytical Methods Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A direct chiral liquid chromatography with UV detection method was developed and validated for enantiomeric determination of clenbuterol β2-agonist in feed samples for poultry. To obtain optimum chromatographic conditions for chiral separation, two commercially available columns packed with vancomycin and teicoplanin chiral stationary phase (150 × 2.1 mm i.d, 5 μm) were tested. Experimental design and response surface analysis were used to model analytical responses and to get mobile phase composition for acceptable enantioresolution and performance in low analysis time. Different sample treatments based on HCX SPE and on the quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, and safe (QuEChERS) method were evaluated and compared to obtain the best extraction recoveries with negligible matrix effect. Special attention was paid to compatibility between sample preparation and chiral separation to get enantioresolution and low detection limits in the high-complex sample. QuEChERS-based extraction allowed obtaining cleaner feed extracts in low sample preparation time, providing a useful and reliable method capable to control the illegal use of clenbuterol enantiomers in feed for growth promotion in food-producing animals. Reproducible recoveries, from 64 to 101 % for clenbuterol enantiomers, with relative standard deviation values within the range 1–6 %, were achieved in feed samples of poultry spiked at low concentration levels of micrograms per gram.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abou-Basha LI, Aboul-Enein HY (1996) Biomed Chromatogr 10:69–72

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aboul-Enein HY, Serignese V (1999) Biomed Chromatogr 13:520–524

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ali I, Aboul-Enein HY (2004) Chiral pollutants: distribution, toxicity and analysis by chromatography and capillary electrophoresis. John Wiley and Sons, England

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Anastassiades M, Lehotay SJ, Štajnbaher D, Schenck FJ (2003) J AOAC Int 86(2):412–431

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • AOAC (1998) Peer-verified methods program, manual on policies and procedures. AOAC, Arlington

    Google Scholar 

  • AOAC (2005) 2007.01 method

  • Beesley TE, Lee JT (2009) J Liq Chromatogr R T 32:1733–1767

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berendsen BJA, Stolker AAM, Nielen MWF (2013) Trend Anal Chem 43:229–239

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bruzzoniti MC, Checchini L, De Carlo RM, Orlandini S, Rivoira L, Del Bubba M (2014) Anal Bioanal Chem 406:4089–4116

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cavazzini A, Pasti L, Massi A, Marchetti N, Dondi F (2011) Anal Chim Acta 706:205–222

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Delgado-Zamarreño MM, Pérez-Martín L, Bustamante-Rangel M, Carabias-Martínez R (2012) Talanta 100:320–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du W, Lei C, Zhang S, Bai G, Zhou H, Sun M, Fu Q, Chang C (2014) J Pharm Biomed Anal 91:160–168

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission Decision (EC) No. 2002/657/EC of 12 (2002) Brussels, implementing council directive 96/23/EC concerning the performance of analytical methods and the interpretation of results. Off J Eur Common 1(221):8–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Harner T, Wiberg K, Nordstrom R (2000) Environ Sci Technol 34:218–220

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • He L, Su Y, Zeng Z, Liu Y, Huang X (2007) Anim Feed Sci Tech 132:316–323

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hefnawy MM, Al-Shehri M, Sultan M, Mostafa GAE (2013) Dig J Nanomater Bios 8(4):1781–1790

    Google Scholar 

  • ICH (2005) Harmonised Tripartite Guideline: validation of analytical procedures: text and methodology, Q2 (R1), Geneva

  • Juan C, Igualada C, Moragues F, León N, Mañes J (2010) J Chromatogr A 1217:6061–6068

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kinsella B, O’Mahony J, Malone E, Moloney M, Cantwell H, Furey A, Danaher M (2009) J Chromatogr A 1216:7977–8015

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krska R, Becalski A, Braekevelt E, Koerner T, Cao X-L, Dabeka R, Godefroy S, Lau B, Moisey J, Rawn DFK, Scott PM, Wang Z, Forsyth D (2012) Anal Bioanal Chem 402:139–162

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lammerhofer M (2010) J Chromatogr A 1217:814–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • León N, Roca M, Igualada C, Martins CPB, Pastor A, Yusá V (2012) J Chromatogr A 1258:55–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Zhang Z, Liu X, Yan H, Han S, Zhang H, Zhang S, Cheng J (2014) Food Anal Method 7:977–985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López-Serna R, Kasprzyk-Hordern B, Petrovi M, Barceló D (2013) Anal Bioanal Chem 405:5859–5873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod SL, Sudhir P, Wong CS (2007) J Chromatogr A 1170:23–33

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martin P, Puech AJ, Brochet D, Soubrié P, Simon P (1985) Eur J Pharmacol 117:127–129

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morales-Trejo F, Vega y León S, Escobar-Medina A, Gutiérrez-Tolentino R (2013) J Food Drug Anal 21:414–420

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mostafa GAE, Hefnawy MM, El-Majed A (2009) J AOAC Inter 92(3):824–829

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Park KH, Choi J, Abd El-Aty AM, Cho S, Park J, Kwon KS, Park HR, Kim HS, Shin H, Kim MR, Shim J (2012) Meat Sci 92:749–753

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pleadin J, Vuli A, Perši N, Vahi N (2010) Meat Sci 86:733–737

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prokhorova AF, Shapovalova EN, Shpigun OA (2010) J Pharm Biomed Anal 53:1170–1179

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ribeiro AR, Castro PML, Tiritan ME (2012) Environ Chem Lett 10:239–253

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Song Y, Wang D, Hu Y, Chen X, Jiao Y, Hou D (2003) J Pharm Biomed Anal 31:311–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thevis M, Thomas A, Beuck S, Butch A, Dvorak J, Schanzer W (2013) Rapid Commun Mass SP 27(4):507–512

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van Loco J, Jànosi A, Impens S, Fraselle S, Cornet V, Degroodt JM (2007) Anal Chim Acta 586:8–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldeck B, Windmark E (1985) Acta Pharmacol Toxicol 56:21–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Wille K, De Brabander HF, De Wulf E, Van Caeter P, Janssen CR, Vanhaecke L (2012) Trend Anal Chem 35:87–108

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • William P, Emmanuelle V (2013) J Chromatogr A 1290:46–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiu-Juan W, Feng Z, Fei D, Wei-Qing L, Qing-Yu C, Xiao-Gang C, Cheng-Bao X (2013) J Chromatogr A 1278:82–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang LY, Chang BY, Dong T, He PL, Yang WJ, Wang ZY (2009) J Chromatogr Sci 47:324–328

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhanga M-X, Li C, Wuc Y-L (2012) J Chromatogr, B 900:94–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao L, Zhao J, Huangf W-G, Wu Y-L (2010) Chromatographia 72:365–368

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The present work was financially supported by the Spanish Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, Secretaría de Estado de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación (project CTQ2011-26684).

Conflict of Interest

Noelia Rosales-Conrado declares that she has no conflict of interest. María Eugenia de León-González declares that she has no conflict of interest. Luis María Polo-Díez declares that he has no conflict of interest. This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Noelia Rosales-Conrado.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rosales-Conrado, N., de León-González, M.E. & Polo-Díez, L.M. Development and Validation of Analytical Method for Clenbuterol Chiral Determination in Animal Feed by Direct Liquid Chromatography. Food Anal. Methods 8, 2647–2659 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-015-0146-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-015-0146-2

Keywords

Navigation