Skip to main content
Log in

Biochip Technology for the Detection of Animal Species in Meat Products

  • Published:
Food Analytical Methods Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The verification of declared components in meat products is an essential task of food control agencies worldwide. To date, the ELISA and species-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) are two commonly applied analytical tools employed by many authorized food control laboratories. These trusted methods however do not allow the simultaneous detection of all the animal species present in a meat sample. Additionally, detection of undeclared components resulting from inadvertent contamination or deliberate adulteration of the meat products requires additional processing of the samples, resulting in increased expenditure. The use of DNA biochip analysis that allows simultaneous processing of many meat products, while concomitantly generating results for the detection of all animal species present in the meat products is thus highly desirable. In this work, two commercially available animal chip detection systems (CarnoCheck Test Kit and MEATspecies LCD Array) are compared in terms of sensitivity, robustness, reproducibility, and ease of handling. The two animal species differentiation biochip methods compared well in efficiency and could simultaneously detect from eight to 14 animal species in the meat products. Detection limits were found to be in the range of 0.1% to 0.5% in meat admixtures, with good reproducibility of results. More than 70 commercially available meat samples were analyzed in this work, with the results validated against traditional PCR methodology. Both biochip methods performed well and could be implemented for routine use in any food control agency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arslan A, Irfan Ilhak O, Calicioglu M (2006) Effect of method of cooking on identification of heat processed beef using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique. Meat Sci 72:326–330

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bai W, Xu W, Huang Y, Cao S, Luo Y (2009) A novel common primer multiplex PCR (CP-M-PCR) method for the simultaneous detection of meat species. Food Control 20:366–370

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chikuni K, Tabata T, Kosugiyama M, Monma M, Saito M (1994) Polymerase chain reaction assay for detection of sheep and goat meats. Meat Sci 37:337–345

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chipron (2005) DNA based identification of meat and poultry species. Data Sheet Meat Species 1.6. Manual V-I-08

  • Commission Directive 2002/86/EC. L 305/19. 2002. Official Journal of the European Communities

  • Commission Recommendation 2004/787/EC. L 348/18. 2004. Official Journal of the European Union

  • Greiner Bio-One (2005) CarnoCheck test kit for the detection of animal species in food. Manual, Version BQ-005-03

  • Hsing-Mei H, Hsiao-Ling C, Li-Chin T, Shu-Ya L, Nu-en H, Linacre A, James Chun-I L (2001) Cytochrome b gene for species identification of the conservation animals. Forensic Sci Int 122:7–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp JT, Davis RW, White RL, Wang SX, Webb CD (2005) A novel method for STR-based DNA Profiling using microarrays. J Forensic Sci 50:1109–1113

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kocher TD, Thomas WK, Meyer A, Edwards SV, Paabo S, Villablanca FX, Wilson AC (1989) Dynamics of mitochondrial DNA evolution in animals: Amplification and sequencing with conserved primers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 86:6196–6200

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Köppel R, Ruf J, Zimmerli F, Breitenmoser A (2008) Multiplex real-time PCR for the detection and quantification of DNA from beef, pork, chicken and turkey. Eur Food Res Technol 227:1199–1203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Köppel R, Zimmerli F, Breitenmoser A (2009) Heptaplex real-time PCR for the identification and quantification of DNA from beef, pork, chicken, turkey, horse meat, sheep (mutton) and goat. Eur Food Res Technol 230:125–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laube I, Spiegelberg A, Butschke A, Zagon J, Schauzu M, Kroh L, Broll H (2003) Methods for the detection of beef and pork in foods using real-time polymerase chain reaction. Int J Food Sci Technol 38:111–118

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laube I, Tagon J, Broll H (2007) Quantitative determination of commercially relevant species in foods by real-time PCR. Int J Food Sci Technol 42:336–341

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ling W-F, Hwang D-F (2008) A multiplex PCR assay for species identification of raw and cooked bonito. Food Control 19:879–885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mane BG, Mendiratta SK, Tiwari Bhilegaokar KN, Ravindra PV, Rautt AA (2007) Precise and rapid identification of ovine-caprine origin of meat by specific PCR assay. J Vet Public Health 5:107–111

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mane BG, Mendiratta SK, Tiwari AK (2009) Polymerase chain reaction assay for identification of chicken in meat and meat products. Food Chem 116:806–810

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Matsunaga T, Chikuni K, Tanabe R, Muroya S, Shibata K, Yamada J, Shinmura Y (1999) A quick and simple method for the identification of meat species and meat products by PCR assay. Meat Sci 51:143–148

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer R, Candrian U, Luethy J (1994) Detection of pork in heated meat Products by polymerase chain reaction. J AOAC Int 77(3):617–622

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nau F, Désert C, Cochet M-F, Pasco M, Jan S, Baron F, Lagarrigue S, Guérin-Dubiard C (2009) Detection of turkey, duck, and guinea fowl egg in hen egg products by species-specific PCR. Food Anal Methods 2:231–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radkey R, Feng L, Muralhider M, Duhon M, Canter D, DiPierro D, Fallon S, Tu E, McElfresh K, Nerenberg M, Sosnowski R (2000) Rapid, high fidelity analysis of simple sequence repeats on an electronically active DNA microchip. Nucleic Acids Res 28(7):E17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stueber E (2008) Comparion of three commercial test kits for species identification in scalding sausages. Arch fuer Lebensmittelhyg 59:84–91, Archives of Food Chemistry, German

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Willse A, Straub TM, Wunschel SC, Small JA, Call DR, Daly DS, Chandler DP (2004) Quantitative oligonucleotide microarray fingerprinting of Salmonella enterica isolates. Nucleic Acids Res 32:1848–1856

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wintero AK, Thomsen PD, Davies W (1990) A comparison of DNA hybridization, countercurrent immunoelectrophoresis and isoelectric focussing for detecting the admixture of pork to beef. Meat Sci 27:75–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf H, Gaede W, Wolf C, Zellerman S, Hoeber S (2001) Nachweis von Tierischen Bestandteilen im Mischfutter. Fleischwirtschaft 81(5):197–201

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zipfel W, Zipfel G (2000) Lebensmittelrecht Textsammlung, 82. Ergänzungslieferung, C. H. München: Beck'sche-Verlagsbuchhandlung (in German)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Azuka N. Iwobi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Iwobi, A.N., Huber, I., Hauner, G. et al. Biochip Technology for the Detection of Animal Species in Meat Products. Food Anal. Methods 4, 389–398 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-010-9178-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-010-9178-9

Keywords

Navigation