Skip to main content
Log in

Theoretical and Behavioral Mediators of a Weight Loss Intervention for Men

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

Objective

Men are currently underrepresented in weight loss trials despite similar obesity rates, which limit our understanding about the most effective elements of treatment for men. The purpose of this study was to test the theoretical (autonomous motivation, self-efficacy, outcome expectancies, and self-regulation) and behavioral (calorie intake, physical activity, self-weighing) mediators of a men-only, Internet-delivered weight loss intervention focused on innovative and tailored treatment elements specifically for men.

Method

Data comes from a 6-month randomized trial (N = 107) testing the intervention compared to a waitlist control group. Changes in the theoretical mediators between baseline and 3 months were tested as mediators of the intervention effect on weight change at 6 months in both single and multiple mediator models. Changes in behaviors between baseline and 6 months were tested in the same manner.

Results

The intervention produced greater weight losses compared to the control group (−5.57 kg ± 6.6 vs. −0.65 kg ± 3.3, p < 0.001) and significant changes (p’s < 0.05) in most of the theoretical and behavior mediators. In multiple mediator models, changes in diet-related autonomous motivation, self-efficacy, and self-regulation all significantly mediated the relationship between the intervention and weight loss. The intervention effect was also mediated by changes in dietary intake and self-weighing frequency.

Conclusions

By testing the theoretical mediators of this intervention in a multiple mediator context, this study contributes to current knowledge related to the development of weight loss interventions for men and suggests that interventions should target diet-focused constructs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Ogden CL. Prevalence of obesity and trends in the distribution of body mass index among US adults, 1999–2010. JAMA. 2012; 307: 491-497.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR, et al. Prevalence of overweight and obesity in the United States, 1999–2004. JAMA. 2006; 295: 1549-1555.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pagoto SL, Schneider KL, Oleski JL, et al. Male inclusion in randomized controlled trials of lifestyle weight loss interventions. Obesity. 2011; 20: 1234-1239.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4. Robertson C, Archibald D, Avenell A, et al. Systematic reviews of and integrated report on the quantitative, qualitative and economic evidence base for the management of obesity in men. Health Technology Assessment. 2014; 18. doi: 10.3310/hta18350.

  5. Williams RL, Wood LG, Collins CE, Callister R. Effectiveness of weight loss interventions- is there a difference between men and women: A systematic review. Obes Rev. 2015; 16: 171-186.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Young MD, Morgan PJ, Plotnikoff RC, Callister R, Collins CE. Effectiveness of male-only weight loss and weight loss maintenance interventions: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2012; 13: 393-408.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lubans DR, Morgan PJ, Collins CE, et al. Mediators of weight loss in the “Healthy Dads, Healthy Kids” pilot study for overweight fathers. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012; 9: 45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Lubans DR, Morgan PJ, Collins CE, Warren JM, Callister R. Exploring the mechanisms of weight loss in the SHED-IT intervention for overweight men: a mediation analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2009; 6: 76.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Young MD, Lubans DR, Collins CE, et al. Behavioral mediators of weight loss in the SHED-IT community randomized controlled trial for overweight and obese men. Ann Behav Med. 2015; 49: 286-292.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jeffery RW. How can health Behavior theory be made more useful for intervention research? Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2004; 1: 10.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Crane MM, Lutes LD, Ward DS, Bowling JM, Tate D. A randomized trial testing the efficacy of a novel approach to weight loss among men with overweight and obesity. Obesity. 2015; 23: 2398-2405.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol. 2000; 55: 68-78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bandura A. Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991; 50: 248-287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bandura A. Health promotion by social cognitive means. Health Educ Behav. 2004; 31: 143-164.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Silva MN, Markland D, Carraca EV, et al. Exercise autonomous motivation predicts 3-yr weight loss in women. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011; 43: 728-737.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Teixeira PJ, Silva MN, Coutinho SR, et al. Mediators of weight loss and weight loss maintenance in middle-aged women. Obesity. 2010; 18: 725-735.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Palmeira AL, Teixeira PJ, Branco TL, et al. Predicting short-term weight loss using four leading health behavior change theories. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2007; 4: 1-12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Warziski MT, Sereika SM, Styn MA, Music E, Burke LE. Changes in self-efficacy and dietary adherence: The impact on weight loss in the PREFER study. J Behav Med. 2008; 31: 81-92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wingo BC, Desmond RA, Brantley P, et al. Self-efficacy as a predictor of weight change and behavior change in the PREMIER Trial. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2013; 45: 314-321.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Steinberg DM, Tate DF, Bennett GG, et al. The efficacy of a daily self-weighing weight loss intervention using smart scales and email. Obesity. 2013; 21: 1789-1797.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Wing RR, Tate DF, Gorin AA, Raynor HA, Fava JL. A self-regulation program for maintenance of weight loss. N Engl J Med. 2006; 355: 1563-1571.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Anderson ES, Winett R, Wojcik J, Williams D. Social cognitive mediators of change in a group randomized nutrition and physical activity intervention: Social support, self-efficacy, outcome expectations and self-regulation in the Guide-to-Health Trial. J Health Psychol. 2010; 15: 21-32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Egger G, Mowbray G. A qualitative analysis of obesity and at-risk overweight in working men. Aust J Nutr Diet. 1993; 50: 10-14.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gough B, Conner MT. Barriers to healthy eating amongst men: A qualitative analysis. Soc Sci Med. 2006; 62: 387-395.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Thomas S, Reading J, Shephard R. Revision of the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire (PAR-Q). Can J Sport Sci. 1992; 17: 338-345.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Reinert DF, Allen JP. The alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT): a review of recent research. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2002; 26: 272-279.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Levesque CS, Williams GC, Elliot D, et al. Validating the theoretical structure of the Treatment Self-Regulation Questionnaire (TSRQ) across three different health behaviors. Health Educ Res. 2007; 22: 691-702.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Clark M, Abrams D, Niaura R, Eaton C, Rossi J. Self-efficacy in weight management. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1991; 59: 739-744.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. O’Neil PM, Currey HS, Hirsch AA, et al. Development and validation of the Eating Behavior Inventory. J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 1979; 1: 123-132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sallis JF, Pinski R, Grossman R, Patterson T, Nader P. The development of self-efficacy scales for health related diet and exercise behaviors. Health Educ Res. 1988; 3: 283-292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Paffenbarger R, Hyde R, Wing A, Hsieh C. Physical activity, all-cause mortality, and longevity of college alumni. N Engl J Med. 1986; 314: 605-613.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Herrmann SD, et al. The Compendium of Physical Activities Tracking Guide. Retrieved September 1, 2013, from https://sites.google.com/site/compendiumofphysicalactivities/

  33. MacKinnon DP, Fritz MS. Required sample size to detect the mediated effect. Psychol Sci. 2007; 18: 233-239.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Hayes AF. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis. New York: The Guilford Press; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Preacher KJ, Hayes AF. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav Res Methods. 2008; 40: 879.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Jeffery RW, Bjornson-Benson WM, Rosenthal BS, et al. Correlates of weight loss and its maintenance over two years of follow-up among middle-aged men. Prev Med. 1984; 13: 155-168.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. French SA, Jeffery RW, Wing RR. Sex differences among participants in a weight-control program. Addict Behav. 1994; 19: 147-158.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Presnell K, Pells J, Stout A, Musante G. Sex differences in the relation of weight loss self-efficacy, binge eating, and depressive symptoms to weight loss success in a residential obesity treatment program. Eat Behav. 2007; 9: 170-180.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Addis ME, Mahalik JR. Men, masculinity, and the contexts of help seeking. Am Psychol. 2003; 58: 5-14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. O’Neil PM, Rieder S. Utility and validity of the eating behavior inventory in clinical obesity research: a review of the literature. Obes Rev. 2005; 6: 209-216.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Zheng Y, Klem ML, Sereika SM, et al. Self-weighing in weight management: A systematic literature review. Obesity. 2015; 23: 256-265.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Pacanowski CR, Levitsky DA. Frequent self-weighing and visual feedback for weight loss in overweight adults. J Obes. 2015; 2015: 9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Swift DL, Johannsen NM, Lavie CJ, Earnest CP, Church TS. The role of exercise and physical activity in weight loss and maintenance. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2014; 56: 441-447.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Wadden TA, Vogt RA, Andersen RE, et al. Exercise in the treatment of obesity: Effects of four interventions on body composition, resting energy expenditure, appetite, and mood. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1997; 65: 269-277.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Collins CE, Morgan PJ, Warren JM, Lubans DR, Callister R. Men participating in a weight-loss intervention are able to implement key dietary messages, but not those relating to vegetables or alcohol: the Self-Help, Exercise and Diet using Internet Technology (SHED-IT) study. Public Health Nutr. 2011; 14: 168-175.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Dhurandhar NV, Schoeller D, Brown AW, et al. Energy balance measurement: when something is not better than nothing. Int J Obes. 2015; 39: 1109-1113.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by funding provided to M. M. Crane through the Cancer Control Education Program (5R25-CA057726) at Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center at The University North Carolina at Chapel Hill and through the Dissertation Completion Fellowship provided by The Graduate School at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. The authors would like to thank Dr. Kurt Ribisl for his assistance in developing and critically evaluating this study while serving on M. M. Crane’s dissertation committee. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01843595.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Melissa M. Crane Ph.D..

Ethics declarations

Authors’ or Authors’ Statement of Conflict of Interest and Adherence to Ethical Standards

Authors Crane, Ward, Lutes, Bowling, Tate declare that they have no conflict of interest. All procedures, including the informed consent process, were conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Crane, M.M., Ward, D.S., Lutes, L.D. et al. Theoretical and Behavioral Mediators of a Weight Loss Intervention for Men. ann. behav. med. 50, 460–470 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-016-9774-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-016-9774-z

Keywords

Navigation